Jared O'Mara

Author
Discussion

Roofless Toothless

5,673 posts

133 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
Lotobear said:
I don't think there's any conspiracy but, surely, anyone can see that the BBC is at least left leaning?
This
Actually, compared to all the national newspapers I can think of, the BBC is remarkably impartial.

I find their London-centric Hipster flavour irritating at times, but the vehemence of the accusations of left wing bias to be found on here says more about the posters than the Beeb.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
Roofless Toothless said:
Stickyfinger said:
Lotobear said:
I don't think there's any conspiracy but, surely, anyone can see that the BBC is at least left leaning?
This
Actually, compared to all the national newspapers I can think of, the BBC is remarkably impartial.

I find their London-centric Hipster flavour irritating at times, but the vehemence of the accusations of left wing bias to be found on here says more about the posters than the Beeb.
You'll have to help me here, what does it say about the posters?

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
He should try for a place in Trump's cabinet.

Oilchange

8,468 posts

261 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
How many of those newspapers are 100% state owned? Private papers can bleat as much biass as they like, we don’t have to pay for them...

Roofless Toothless said:
Actually, compared to all the national newspapers I can think of, the BBC is remarkably impartial.

I find their London-centric Hipster flavour irritating at times, but the vehemence of the accusations of left wing bias to be found on here says more about the posters than the Beeb.

Gogoplata

1,266 posts

161 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
This whole story is fake news, I haven't seen a single Canary article about it shared on Facebook. scratchchin

Lotobear

6,378 posts

129 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
Mybrainhurts....err that kind of occured to me as well, initially I pondered.. sanctimony? but the polite side of my nature allowed the benefit of the doubt.

Lance Catamaran

24,989 posts

228 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
It's all a conspiracy by those pesky Zionists.....


Roofless Toothless

5,673 posts

133 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
Oilchange said:
How many of those newspapers are 100% state owned? Private papers can bleat as much biass as they like, we don’t have to pay for them...

Roofless Toothless said:
Actually, compared to all the national newspapers I can think of, the BBC is remarkably impartial.

I find their London-centric Hipster flavour irritating at times, but the vehemence of the accusations of left wing bias to be found on here says more about the posters than the Beeb.
The BBC is not state owned, state funded or state controlled.

It is funded by the TV Licence, which the government neither collects nor controls.

It is a state corporation that operates under a charter and is governed by trustees who have the responsibility to ensure that its output is balanced and unbiased.

Newspapers have no such requirement and print what the owners see fit. And you do have to pay for them. I don't recall my local newsagent giving away copies of the Daily Mail or The Guardian. Of course, you don't have to buy them if you don't want to read what they contain. If you don't like what is on the BBC you don't have to buy a TV set that can receive it. (You get the radio for free, however.)

Personally I think that the trustees are effective in maintaining the balance of the BBC, and its editorial stance is a lot more unbiased than the press.

But if your own political perspective is on the right, media that occupy the centre ground will inevitably appear to be on the left. Which is why the vehemence of those posters who criticise the BBC tells me a lot about where their own political opinions are based.

There are those on the left who see the BBC as part of the Establishment.

https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourbeeb/tom-mills/ge...

I think that the BBC does a good job in steering a centre path.


Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
Roofless Toothless said:
The BBC is not state owned, state funded or state controlled.

It is funded by the TV Licence, which the government neither collects nor controls.

It is a state corporation that operates under a charter and is governed by trustees who have the responsibility to ensure that its output is balanced and unbiased.

Newspapers have no such requirement and print what the owners see fit. And you do have to pay for them. I don't recall my local newsagent giving away copies of the Daily Mail or The Guardian. Of course, you don't have to buy them if you don't want to read what they contain. If you don't like what is on the BBC you don't have to buy a TV set that can receive it. (You get the radio for free, however.)

Personally I think that the trustees are effective in maintaining the balance of the BBC, and its editorial stance is a lot more unbiased than the press.

But if your own political perspective is on the right, media that occupy the centre ground will inevitably appear to be on the left. Which is why the vehemence of those posters who criticise the BBC tells me a lot about where their own political opinions are based.

There are those on the left who see the BBC as part of the Establishment.

https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourbeeb/tom-mills/ge...

I think that the BBC does a good job in steering a centre path.
And you set where the center is do you ?...seems to me you have the same logic as the BBC has developed and you live in the same bubble.

As the Eu ref was 48/52 (ish)....do you think the BBC presented in the ratio ?

Roofless Toothless

5,673 posts

133 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
And you set where the center is do you ?...seems to me you have the same logic as the BBC has developed and you live in the same bubble.

As the Eu ref was 48/52 (ish)....do you think the BBC presented in the ratio ?
Well, I think you ask a very fair question. I set where the centre is with regard to the way I see the world myself. It's a subjective thing, I suppose, and I have no right nor desire to make others have to agree with me.

I do have the right to state what I think myself, and that is what I have done, just like everyone else does on here.

However, the fact that the BBC gets criticism from both the left and the right makes me think they must be somewhere near the centre.

I have helped hi-jack this thread already by getting into this debate, and I hesitate to do so further by getting on to Brexit, but I would say that the BBC coverage was somewhere between the Mail and the Guardian - but that's a pretty big chasm. smile

Personally, I think I saw enough to make me think they made every effort to present both sides of the argument in the run up to the referendum. I imagine the trustees were watching the situation pretty closely, too.

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
fair enough

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
Roofless Toothless said:
Stickyfinger said:
And you set where the center is do you ?...seems to me you have the same logic as the BBC has developed and you live in the same bubble.

As the Eu ref was 48/52 (ish)....do you think the BBC presented in the ratio ?
Well, I think you ask a very fair question. I set where the centre is with regard to the way I see the world myself. It's a subjective thing, I suppose, and I have no right nor desire to make others have to agree with me.

I do have the right to state what I think myself, and that is what I have done, just like everyone else does on here.

However, the fact that the BBC gets criticism from both the left and the right makes me think they must be somewhere near the centre.

I have helped hi-jack this thread already by getting into this debate, and I hesitate to do so further by getting on to Brexit, but I would say that the BBC coverage was somewhere between the Mail and the Guardian - but that's a pretty big chasm. smile

Personally, I think I saw enough to make me think they made every effort to present both sides of the argument in the run up to the referendum. I imagine the trustees were watching the situation pretty closely, too.
Can you explain why BBC top jobs are advertised exclusively in the Guardian?

Roofless Toothless

5,673 posts

133 months

Saturday 28th October 2017
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Can you explain why BBC top jobs are advertised exclusively in the Guardian?
I don't read (and I can't stand) the Guardian. For that matter I don't read any national newspaper.

However forgive me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that the Guardian has a very large media jobs section, in fact, the only media jobs section in any national newspaper. It is also available foc on line.

https://jobs.theguardian.com/jobs/media/

Perhaps this explains it.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 28th October 2017
quotequote all
BBC jobs are also advertised on sites such as Production Base, which is a big jobs network for the media industry, and on the BBC's own website. In other words, jobs are advertised in the places where people are likely to look for them.

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

254 months

Saturday 28th October 2017
quotequote all
TVR Moneypit said:
SpeckledJim said:
I do quite fancy Emily Thornberry though.

There, I said it.
Jesus Christ man. What's wrong with you? It isn't even like her personality, intelligence or charisma can make up for her looks. Of course that predominantly because she has no personality, intelligence or charisma.

What a frightful female she is.
Short answer: dimples.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 28th October 2017
quotequote all
I am still relieved that I got away with perving A Rudd and E Truss. Thornberry pervs rightly deserve obloquy.

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

254 months

Saturday 28th October 2017
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
I am still relieved that I got away with perving A Rudd and E Truss. Thornberry pervs rightly deserve obloquy.
I knew it was a bit weird, but still surprised at the level of ghast it received.

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Saturday 28th October 2017
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
Short answer: dimples.
on every part however

S11Steve

6,374 posts

185 months

Wednesday 13th December 2017
quotequote all
And now the poor diddums has been signed off work on the sick - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42336727

We still haven't heard a peep from him or his cronies, but the Lib Dems and Tories are still sending out regular updates to the constituents.
O'Mara, seems to be more interested in giving it the "big I am" with his all student sycophants down Eccleshall Road.

Life on the gravy train is not all it has cracked up to be.


Lotobear

6,378 posts

129 months

Wednesday 13th December 2017
quotequote all
Jared enters the victimhood phase, his rehabilitation is almost complete