Priti Patel

[dandarez]

carinaman said:

CoolHands said:

Page 100. Still would

Is that Prince Andrew behind her?

Don't be daft.
All these experts on Priti Priti who know all about her and hate her, yet don't know the guy behind?

I'd say at a good guess it's her hubbie.
He's a tall bloke.

[Escort3500]

dandarez said:

carinaman said:

CoolHands said:

Page 100. Still would

Is that Prince Andrew behind her?

Don't be daft.
All these experts on Priti Priti who know all about her and hate her, yet don't know the guy behind?

I'd say at a good guess it's her hubbie.
He's a tall bloke.

He sure is

[carinaman]

For the fans:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jul/05/p...

It was a sidebar suggestion from an article about her statement on the Leicester clothes making sweatshops and the need to strengthen the Modern Slavery Act when the problem has been known about for at least a decade, half a decade before that Bill was passed.

[yorkshire.lashes]

CoolHands said:

Page 100. Still would

.....

Escort3500 said:

He looks like someone out of 'Kingsman: The Seret Service'...

I'd watch your back if I were you CoolHands.

[smn159]

Escort3500 said:

He sure is

Indeed. he must be, what, 5'10"?

[HannsG]

Absolutely minging.

And this comes from an north Indian looking fella. Plenty of Indian type milfs out there...

Stuffing a portly pig comes to mind

[biggbn]

HannsG said:

Absolutely minging.

And this comes from an north Indian looking fella. Plenty of Indian type milfs out there...

Stuffing a portly pig comes to mind

How absolutely charming. And completely irrelevant, as are posts of the opposite nature. Its all rather pathetic on here at times.

[HannsG]

biggbn said:

How absolutely charming. And completely irrelevant, as are posts of the opposite nature. Its all rather pathetic on here at times.

Sorry. Must have 'Woke' you

[smn159]

HannsG said:

biggbn said:

How absolutely charming. And completely irrelevant, as are posts of the opposite nature. Its all rather pathetic on here at times.

Sorry. Must have 'Woke' you

Is it 'woke' now to call out internet misogyny then?

It's not the 1970s any more

[biggbn]

smn159 said:

HannsG said:

biggbn said:

How absolutely charming. And completely irrelevant, as are posts of the opposite nature. Its all rather pathetic on here at times.

Sorry. Must have 'Woke' you

Is it 'woke' now to call out internet misogyny then?

It's not the 1970s any more

To be fair to HannsG, I am a bit of a hypocrite as I have quite vocally and regularly criticised Patel on this, and other, forums. Admittedly my criticism has been about my perceptions of her ability to perform in the posts she has held in government, but each to their own. We all have differing agendas and parameters within which we feel comfortable expressing ourself. I'm sure HannsG is a perfectly nice fellow in reality and his virtual persona is merely a foil for his usual gentle, kind, respectful and mannerful self. The problem with creating these virtual personas is, however, that we rarely meet the real individual, so there is a danger that we just assume the poster is a mannerless oaf/wker. I'm sure this is not the case for HanssG but, having "woke' me to the possibility, he is perhaps the architect of his own downfall?

[markyb_lcy]

biggbn said:

HannsG said:

Absolutely minging.

And this comes from an north Indian looking fella. Plenty of Indian type milfs out there...

Stuffing a portly pig comes to mind

How absolutely charming. And completely irrelevant, as are posts of the opposite nature. Its all rather pathetic on here at times.

Pretty distasteful. I’m not sure those kind of comments have any real time or place at all but if they do, a public forum isn’t it.

Classic beta-male behaviour if you ask me.

[PositronicRay]

I like her. She's a blunt instrument, sometimes it's what you need.

[vonuber]

Tom Logan said:

Very doubtful.

(It's an age thing).

And he was in Pizza Hut that day.

[Condi]

PositronicRay said:

I like her. She's a blunt instrument, sometimes it's what you need.

More frequently you need tact, diplomacy and in depth understanding of policy. All of which she is lacking.

[FN2TypeR]

PositronicRay said:

I like her. She's a blunt instrument, sometimes it's what you need.

She's useless and an inveterate liar, which is why she was drummed out of cabinet last time around.

[Escort3500]

Condi said:

PositronicRay said:

I like her. She's a blunt instrument, sometimes it's what you need.

More frequently you need tact, diplomacy and in depth understanding of policy. All of which she is lacking.

Together with honesty, integrity and morals. All of which she is lacking.

[Condi]

Escort3500 said:

Condi said:

PositronicRay said:

I like her. She's a blunt instrument, sometimes it's what you need.

More frequently you need tact, diplomacy and in depth understanding of policy. All of which she is lacking.

Together with honesty, integrity and morals. All of which she is lacking.

Fitting in well with the rest of the Cabinet there.

[JuniorD]

PositronicRay said:

I like her. She's a blunt instrument, sometimes it's what you need.

Like for when you want to royally fk something up?

[carinaman]

That may damage her leadership chances?:

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/r...

[rodericb]

smn159 said:

Escort3500 said:

He sure is

Indeed. he must be, what, 5'10"?

I see the latest "news" is a video of Priti Patel in some video conference wrangling a large mug.