Another prove your innocence case

Another prove your innocence case

Author
Discussion

Stay in Bed Instead

22,362 posts

158 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
s2art said:
In what universe is a horny 13 year old lad shagging a willing hot 17 year old girl 'abuse'? Technically illegal perhaps, but abuse?
What's this technically?

It's unlawful. It's child abuse. End of discussion.

amusingduck

9,398 posts

137 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
s2art said:
Stay in Bed Instead said:
Yet no doubt it would if the perpetrator was male and the victim female.

You attitude of trivialising sexual abuse of boys sucks to be honest.
In what universe is a horny 13 year old lad shagging a willing hot 17 year old girl 'abuse'? Technically illegal perhaps, but abuse?
When they're in a position of trust?

AshVX220

5,929 posts

191 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
s2art said:
Another non PC vote here. If I at 13 had the opportunity to shag a hot 17 year old I would have perceived it as the exact opposite of abuse. Like it or not boys and girls are different.
We're continually informed that to have such thoughts is wrong in this day and age.......

jshell

11,044 posts

206 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
s2art said:
In what universe is a horny 13 year old lad shagging a willing hot 17 year old girl 'abuse'? Technically illegal perhaps, but abuse?
I'm with you, some of these posters are not of this planet! Or they are utterly unfamiliar with sex. At 13 I'd have even whipped out a condom and saved the whole fertilisation scenario! I'd have shagged my mates ugly mum...and never once have cried 'abuse'.

On the other hand, I was directly propositioned for sex by a 14 yr old when I was 15 and a 13 year old when I was 16. I turned both down as they were under age of consent. The boy who 'stepped up' for the 13 year old had a rather nasty and deserved visit from the police...

Thorodin

2,459 posts

134 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
All these circular arguments are centered on the definition of Abuse. Apparently anything descriptive and/or critical one does, says, or thinks that involves another person is or can be abusive. And that's plain and simple cobblers. If what is here considered to be a victim, obviously he was a very willing participant in breaking the law, so he is equally guilty in his own 'abuse'... er… like most nights when on his own probably.

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Stay in Bed Instead said:
s2art said:
In what universe is a horny 13 year old lad shagging a willing hot 17 year old girl 'abuse'? Technically illegal perhaps, but abuse?
What's this technically?

It's unlawful. It's child abuse. End of discussion.
Oh no it isn't, it's 99% of all horny thirteen year old boys fantasies.

Now *that's* the real end of the discussion wink

Stay in Bed Instead

22,362 posts

158 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
WinstonWolf said:
Oh no it isn't, it's 99% of all horny thirteen year old boys fantasies.

Now *that's* the real end of the discussion wink
I guess the perpetrator should have used that in her defence instead of claiming he raped her multiple times.

Agammemnon

1,628 posts

59 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Stay in Bed Instead said:
What's this technically?

It's unlawful. It's child abuse. End of discussion.
It's not unlawful, it's illegal.

Despite this I doubt any actual harm was done regardless of the technicality of it being child abuse.The kid might well be bragging about it forever more.

I accept that my view isn't PC

s2art

18,937 posts

254 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Agammemnon said:
Stay in Bed Instead said:
What's this technically?

It's unlawful. It's child abuse. End of discussion.
It's not unlawful, it's illegal.

Despite this I doubt any actual harm was done regardless of the technicality of it being child abuse.The kid might well be bragging about it forever more.

I accept that my view isn't PC
imagine the mental harm if she had said I am dying to shag you but the law says I cant. Years of regret and subsequent depression. Now that would be abuse.

jshell

11,044 posts

206 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
s2art said:
Agammemnon said:
Stay in Bed Instead said:
What's this technically?

It's unlawful. It's child abuse. End of discussion.
It's not unlawful, it's illegal.

Despite this I doubt any actual harm was done regardless of the technicality of it being child abuse.The kid might well be bragging about it forever more.

I accept that my view isn't PC
imagine the mental harm if she had said I am dying to shag you but the law says I cant. Years of regret and subsequent depression. Now that would be abuse.
biglaugh

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

179 months

Fastpedeller

3,878 posts

147 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Hmm - Interesting that (from the report) they did their investigations before she left the store - I was always of the belief that they couldn't prove intent unless the person had left the store ie. she could say any time before leaving "oh I need to pay for these".
Crazy, when we have young tea leaves just grabbing handfuls of goods and running out of stores and the Police reaction is "down to the store" that a petty thing such as this should be taken to court. If some compassion had been shown and they gifted them to her (I suspect she hasn't stolen them anyway) and they treated her kindly, she'd feel so bad about it that she'd never do it again. These things are easily done anyway.... A couple of times over the years I've put a paper under my arm and carried other goods to the checkout and the till assistant has said " did you want the paper as well?" I didn't intend to avoid paying, and felt bad that I'd done it - I'd have been horrified if they'd said "right, we're getting Police etc"

Agammemnon

1,628 posts

59 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
Fastpedeller said:
If some compassion had been shown and they gifted them to her (I suspect she hasn't stolen them anyway) and they treated her kindly, she'd feel so bad about it that she'd never do it again.
What charming naivety. I can genuinely believe that you're a really nice person. I suspect that many shoplifters are less so.

Fastpedeller

3,878 posts

147 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
Agammemnon said:
Fastpedeller said:
If some compassion had been shown and they gifted them to her (I suspect she hasn't stolen them anyway) and they treated her kindly, she'd feel so bad about it that she'd never do it again.
What charming naivety. I can genuinely believe that you're a really nice person. I suspect that many shoplifters are less so.
And I can believe that a 'professional shoplifter' would take far more than a couple of pounds worth of headache tablets!

Agammemnon

1,628 posts

59 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
Fastpedeller said:
And I can believe that a 'professional shoplifter' would take far more than a couple of pounds worth of headache tablets!
Some thieving buggers have small ambitions or believe that small thefts are in some way more acceptable?

Fastpedeller

3,878 posts

147 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
Agammemnon said:
Fastpedeller said:
And I can believe that a 'professional shoplifter' would take far more than a couple of pounds worth of headache tablets!
Some thieving buggers have small ambitions or believe that small thefts are in some way more acceptable?
yes that's true.
In this particular case the lady could also have early dementia/laps of memory. My late mother got dementia and started going to a large supermarket and putting things into her bag without paying - the store were very understanding. other times she was 'on the ball' and you'd think there wasn't a health problem.

otolith

56,266 posts

205 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
What an appalling waste of public money.

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

179 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
otolith said:
What an appalling waste of public money.
In low crime areas it may be a way of training people up for the big one.
At least it will put paid to any finger wagging if it hadnt gone to trial.

jshell

11,044 posts

206 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all

s2art

18,937 posts

254 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
jshell said:
Sounds a lot like some of the teachers I had. Kids are snowflakes these days.