Another prove your innocence case
Discussion
No retrial
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-4589...
How do they turn the clock back as if the trial hadnt happened?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-4589...
How do they turn the clock back as if the trial hadnt happened?
saaby93 said:
No retrial
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-4589...
How do they turn the clock back as if the trial hadnt happened?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-4589...
How do they turn the clock back as if the trial hadnt happened?
Top notch editing at the BBC
saaby93 said:
No retrial
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-4589...
How do they turn the clock back as if the trial hadnt happened?
Disgraceful situation. Poor womanhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-4589...
How do they turn the clock back as if the trial hadnt happened?
Burwood said:
saaby93 said:
No retrial
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-4589...
How do they turn the clock back as if the trial hadnt happened?
Disgraceful situation. Poor womanhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-4589...
How do they turn the clock back as if the trial hadnt happened?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6288243/P...
not too much different to anyone else?
Burwood said:
saaby93 said:
No retrial
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-4589...
How do they turn the clock back as if the trial hadnt happened?
Disgraceful situation. Poor womanhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-4589...
How do they turn the clock back as if the trial hadnt happened?
Maybe, maybe not. Whether or not she had sex with the pupil on the plane, it's pretty clear the boundaries between teacher and pupil were blurred...article said:
In court, Miss Wilson admitted seeing the pupil on these occasions and texting him ‘almost daily’ over the summer, but said these meetings were innocent and because she had ‘no one else to turn to’
Burwood said:
saaby93 said:
Burwood said:
In light of further evidence I've changed my mind. She most likely did it and shouldn't be around school kids
How many people have been locked up on that basis Back to the case in hand- how much of accusations should be put in the public eye, and how much should be witheld until proven?
This may help...
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov...
'Juries have no place in rape trials. They simply can’t be trusted'
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov...
'Juries have no place in rape trials. They simply can’t be trusted'
andy_s said:
This may help...
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov...
'Juries have no place in rape trials. They simply can’t be trusted'
andhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov...
'Juries have no place in rape trials. They simply can’t be trusted'
'Look, for example, at the Ched Evans case, a footballer who was convicted of rape but later had his conviction quashed and was acquitted at a retrial that relied on evidence of the complainant’s alleged sexual history. Despite some male barristers arguing that feminist campaigners were overreacting, the case showed us how women in rape cases are often more on trial than the defendant.'
We know now that she cried wolf in previous relations
How is a jury to know that without uncovering previous?
saaby93 said:
and
'Look, for example, at the Ched Evans case, a footballer who was convicted of rape but later had his conviction quashed and was acquitted at a retrial that relied on evidence of the complainant’s alleged sexual history. Despite some male barristers arguing that feminist campaigners were overreacting, the case showed us how women in rape cases are often more on trial than the defendant.'
We know now that she cried wolf in previous relations
How is a jury to know that without uncovering previous?
If you are talking about the additional evidence presented at the second trial-that most definitely was not the complainant 'crying wolf' in previous relations.'Look, for example, at the Ched Evans case, a footballer who was convicted of rape but later had his conviction quashed and was acquitted at a retrial that relied on evidence of the complainant’s alleged sexual history. Despite some male barristers arguing that feminist campaigners were overreacting, the case showed us how women in rape cases are often more on trial than the defendant.'
We know now that she cried wolf in previous relations
How is a jury to know that without uncovering previous?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/oct/14/ca...
cookie118 said:
saaby93 said:
and
'Look, for example, at the Ched Evans case, a footballer who was convicted of rape but later had his conviction quashed and was acquitted at a retrial that relied on evidence of the complainant’s alleged sexual history. Despite some male barristers arguing that feminist campaigners were overreacting, the case showed us how women in rape cases are often more on trial than the defendant.'
We know now that she cried wolf in previous relations
How is a jury to know that without uncovering previous?
If you are talking about the additional evidence presented at the second trial-that most definitely was not the complainant 'crying wolf' in previous relations.'Look, for example, at the Ched Evans case, a footballer who was convicted of rape but later had his conviction quashed and was acquitted at a retrial that relied on evidence of the complainant’s alleged sexual history. Despite some male barristers arguing that feminist campaigners were overreacting, the case showed us how women in rape cases are often more on trial than the defendant.'
We know now that she cried wolf in previous relations
How is a jury to know that without uncovering previous?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/oct/14/ca...
It seems that in the first Evans trial that wasnt believed.
There was apparantly another another report that after the activity she'd gone on to complain/regret she hadnt wanted to do it after all
Same as the Evans case?
saaby93 said:
In the cases reported there you can see that she was the lead in the encounters
It seems that in the first Evans trial that wasnt believed.
There was apparantly another another report that after the activity she'd gone on to complain/regret she hadnt wanted to do it after all
Same as the Evans case?
And that still is not 'crying wolf'.It seems that in the first Evans trial that wasnt believed.
There was apparantly another another report that after the activity she'd gone on to complain/regret she hadnt wanted to do it after all
Same as the Evans case?
cookie118 said:
saaby93 said:
In the cases reported there you can see that she was the lead in the encounters
It seems that in the first Evans trial that wasnt believed.
There was apparantly another another report that after the activity she'd gone on to complain/regret she hadnt wanted to do it after all
Same as the Evans case?
And that still is not 'crying wolf'.It seems that in the first Evans trial that wasnt believed.
There was apparantly another another report that after the activity she'd gone on to complain/regret she hadnt wanted to do it after all
Same as the Evans case?
What's your meaning of crying wolf?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff