Another prove your innocence case

[saaby93]

s2art said:

Another non PC vote here. If I at 13 had the opportunity to shag a hot 17 year old I would have perceived it as the exact opposite of abuse. Like it or not boys and girls are different.

Only if you think girls dont have similar thoughts or carry them out.
So back to the point
Why wasnt the lad put before the courts when the girl accused him?
What could he have put forward to show his innocence

[saaby93]

Hope this one doesnt cause a headache
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-51735185
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-51752649

[saaby93]

otolith said:

What an appalling waste of public money.

In low crime areas it may be a way of training people up for the big one.
At least it will put paid to any finger wagging if it hadnt gone to trial.

[saaby93]

How would this one have gone if it wasnt for the dashcam evidence?
https://www.rugbyadvertiser.co.uk/news/crime/elder...

[saaby93]

poo at Paul's said:

saaby93 said:

How would this one have gone if it wasnt for the dashcam evidence?
https://www.rugbyadvertiser.co.uk/news/crime/elder...

Quite interesting, the judge saying that when she looked he as so far away that HAD HE BEEN DOING SPEED LIMIIT, she had time to pull out.
That's quite a claim, bearing in mind that when one looks, you surely have to be able to "judge" the speed to some degree, ie a milkfloat or cyclist doing 30mph, vs cars and trucks doing 50, or indeed a truck doing 20!
Bike doing 60, vs bike doing 100? Him doing a hundred "when she looked" (assuming he probably braked quite a lot) means he hit the side of her car. How much room would she have left him had he been doing 60? All sounds a bit tight of a manouever to me?

I am not saying judge is wrong, but him doing 60 and it is a "safe, non careless" manouever, vs him doing 100 at the point she looked and he is dead?

ok suppose youre the judge and without the dashcam evidence you have to assume the biker is doing say less than 50mph
Does being 83 count against her? or is 93 the new 83?
Would she have been convicted?
In her shoes - how do you prove your innocence?