The U.S.A. Mass Shootings Thread

The U.S.A. Mass Shootings Thread

Author
Discussion

red_slr

17,322 posts

190 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
TheRainMaker said:
red_slr said:
In 114 Mass shootings analysed over 37 years the following number of firearms were used

Handguns = 141
Rifles = 53
Shotguns = 30
Perfect, remove handguns as well.
Shotguns are ok though?

Gameface

16,565 posts

78 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
fking imbecile.

No to background checks. Yes to prayer.

You stupid .

TheRainMaker

6,367 posts

243 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
red_slr said:
TheRainMaker said:
red_slr said:
In 114 Mass shootings analysed over 37 years the following number of firearms were used

Handguns = 141
Rifles = 53
Shotguns = 30
Perfect, remove handguns as well.
Shotguns are ok though?
Not really remove those too.

Ructions

Original Poster:

4,705 posts

122 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
Zirconia said:
^^^^^^
Religion and politics should never work together.

Meanwhile, back in the real world.
Meanwhile back in the real world they are praying to calm a hurricane down. There’s wiser eating grass.

https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/08/31/the...

rscott

14,789 posts

192 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
red_slr said:
I really do need to just give up on this thread. You cant just make things up as you go along.

Rifles are not used most frequently in mass shootings. Hand guns are.

In 114 Mass shootings analysed over 37 years the following number of firearms were used

Handguns = 141
Rifles = 53
Shotguns = 30
Figures from this article? https://www.kunc.org/post/1982-74-percent-mass-sho...

The one which confirms 74% obtained guns legally - that's pretty damning condemnation of the checks currently in place.

Gameface

16,565 posts

78 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
I like that website!

Zirconia

36,010 posts

285 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all

bitchstewie

51,588 posts

211 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
Zirconia said:
Bi-polar, PTSD, strong political views, and guns.

And now he's pissed because they took his guns away and had him committed for 3 weeks.

What could possibly go wrong there.

Byker28i

60,518 posts

218 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
Texas shooter had previously failed a background check
https://m.chron.com/news/article/Odessa-spokeswoma...

On Sunday afternoon, federal agents executed a search warrant at what appeared to be Mr. Ator’s residence, in a remote area of mobile homes at the western edge of Ector County, which includes Odessa. A neighbor, Rocio Martinez, 29, described Mr. Ator as a “loner” who kept to himself and who sometimes frightened her because he was always firing guns outside.

“Although I feel bad about the situation, I feel at ease knowing that he was killed,” Ms. Martinez said. “That tells me the threat has been removed, and my family is safe again.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/01/us/death-toll-t...

zygalski

7,759 posts

146 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
I know it's been said before, but I can't believe the amount of criticism the US gun laws get from staunch Tory PH'ers who, if they'd have grown up in the US culture, I am absolutely convinced would pretty much all be GOP advocates of the 2nd Amendment. You're all against minimal government interference, too.

ferrisbueller

29,363 posts

228 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
The 2nd amendment is about 100 years out of date.

The UK, and Australia etc, reacted to events such as Dunblane whereas the US chooses not to.

LimaDelta

6,535 posts

219 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
ferrisbueller said:
The 2nd amendment is about 100 years out of date.

The UK, and Australia etc, reacted to events such as Dunblane whereas the US chooses not to.
Yes, because since Dunblane gun crime has been completely eradicated from our shores. Our inner city areas have never been safer now that handguns are illegal.


p1stonhead

25,616 posts

168 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
LimaDelta said:
ferrisbueller said:
The 2nd amendment is about 100 years out of date.

The UK, and Australia etc, reacted to events such as Dunblane whereas the US chooses not to.
Yes, because since Dunblane gun crime has been completely eradicated from our shores. Our inner city areas have never been safer now that handguns are illegal.
It’s like you are trying to be sarcastic but it’s acrually probably true.

djc206

12,396 posts

126 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
LimaDelta said:
Yes, because since Dunblane gun crime has been completely eradicated from our shores. Our inner city areas have never been safer now that handguns are illegal.
How much more dangerous would they be if they weren’t?

Byker28i

60,518 posts

218 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
Ted Cruz cites the bible

2/x The right to self-defense is recognized repeatedly in the Bible, eg Exodus 22:2: “If a thief is caught breaking in at night & is struck a fatal blow, the defender is not guilty of bloodshed.” (Note, though, verse 3 says it IS murder if during daylight (ie, not self-defense).

https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/116831746885672...


Can anyone knowing fuller american history explain Cruz here:
8/x That’s also why, post Civil War, disarming Black Americans was a critical objective of the KKK, and was memorialized in countless Jim Crow laws—to strip African-Americans of their God-given right to self-defense from violence.

LimaDelta

6,535 posts

219 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
djc206 said:
LimaDelta said:
Yes, because since Dunblane gun crime has been completely eradicated from our shores. Our inner city areas have never been safer now that handguns are illegal.
How much more dangerous would they be if they weren’t?
Who knows? But it is disingenuous at best to suggest the knee-jerk reactions to Hungerford and Dunblane have reduced gun crime in the UK. Now only the bad guys have the guns. This is a big part of the argument in the US.

ferrisbueller

29,363 posts

228 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
LimaDelta said:
djc206 said:
LimaDelta said:
Yes, because since Dunblane gun crime has been completely eradicated from our shores. Our inner city areas have never been safer now that handguns are illegal.
How much more dangerous would they be if they weren’t?
Who knows? But it is disingenuous at best to suggest the knee-jerk reactions to Hungerford and Dunblane have reduced gun crime in the UK. Now only the bad guys have the guns. This is a big part of the argument in the US.
Can you post up the list of mass shootings since?

Halmyre

11,244 posts

140 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
LimaDelta said:
djc206 said:
LimaDelta said:
Yes, because since Dunblane gun crime has been completely eradicated from our shores. Our inner city areas have never been safer now that handguns are illegal.
How much more dangerous would they be if they weren’t?
Who knows? But it is disingenuous at best to suggest the knee-jerk reactions to Hungerford and Dunblane have reduced gun crime in the UK. Now only the bad guys have the guns. This is a big part of the argument in the US.
But the UK's homicide rate is 1/75th of that of the US, where good guys have guns as well.

All those good guys with guns don't seem to be helping much.

Byker28i

60,518 posts

218 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
ferrisbueller said:
LimaDelta said:
djc206 said:
LimaDelta said:
Yes, because since Dunblane gun crime has been completely eradicated from our shores. Our inner city areas have never been safer now that handguns are illegal.
How much more dangerous would they be if they weren’t?
Who knows? But it is disingenuous at best to suggest the knee-jerk reactions to Hungerford and Dunblane have reduced gun crime in the UK. Now only the bad guys have the guns. This is a big part of the argument in the US.
Can you post up the list of mass shootings since?
No school shootings since
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dunblane-school-...

Only one I can think of is Derrick Bird, killed 12 injured 11 in Cumbria in 2010.
.22 rifle and a shotgun.

ferrisbueller

29,363 posts

228 months

Monday 2nd September 2019
quotequote all
Byker28i said:
ferrisbueller said:
LimaDelta said:
djc206 said:
LimaDelta said:
Yes, because since Dunblane gun crime has been completely eradicated from our shores. Our inner city areas have never been safer now that handguns are illegal.
How much more dangerous would they be if they weren’t?
Who knows? But it is disingenuous at best to suggest the knee-jerk reactions to Hungerford and Dunblane have reduced gun crime in the UK. Now only the bad guys have the guns. This is a big part of the argument in the US.
Can you post up the list of mass shootings since?
No school shootings since
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dunblane-school-...

Only one I can think of is Derrick Bird, killed 12 injured 11 in Cumbria in 2010.
.22 rifle and a shotgun.
Must be a fluke.

How about Australia since Port Arthur?