Nigel Farage - pay docked for cheating on his Euro expenses
Discussion
sidicks said:
eharding said:
Please - stop being such a drama queen,
No drama, just asking what he meant by his comment.You may take a course of action and i may take a course of action that will lead to us both meeting you can never say never.
Indeed we may have already met, you just might not have realised it.
citizensm1th said:
If you do not understand Karma you are not as well edumacated as you think you are.
You may take a course of action and i may take a course of action that will lead to us both meeting you can never say never.
Indeed we may have already met, you just might not have realised it.
You may take a course of action and i may take a course of action that will lead to us both meeting you can never say never.
Indeed we may have already met, you just might not have realised it.
Doesn't really explain why, in that case, karma would be a 'fickle bh'. Surely it could be a positive experience and shared understanding? But never mind.
gooner1 said:
Reluctantly here
You couldn't stay away even if your coop was ablaze.
Btw, it's gooner, Edward. It's also customary to begin a sentence with
a capital letter. Just saying . Apart from that, your insults are akin to being savaged by a dead Geoffrey Howe.
I was talking about you, not to you. On the assumption your user name indicates the football team you follow, it then comes as no surprise you have trouble understanding simple concepts. Hippocrite that.You couldn't stay away even if your coop was ablaze.
Btw, it's gooner, Edward. It's also customary to begin a sentence with
a capital letter. Just saying . Apart from that, your insults are akin to being savaged by a dead Geoffrey Howe.
sidicks said:
citizensm1th said:
If you do not understand Karma you are not as well edumacated as you think you are.
You may take a course of action and i may take a course of action that will lead to us both meeting you can never say never.
Indeed we may have already met, you just might not have realised it.
You may take a course of action and i may take a course of action that will lead to us both meeting you can never say never.
Indeed we may have already met, you just might not have realised it.
Doesn't really explain why, in that case, karma would be a 'fickle bh'. Surely it could be a positive experience and shared understanding? But never mind.
Rather fitting for a thread on farage
sidicks said:
citizensm1th said:
Because you cannot tell what the unintended consequence of an action may be.
Rather fitting for a thread on farage
In that case, seems like I'm a glass half full guy and you're a glass half empty kind of person?Rather fitting for a thread on farage
citizensm1th said:
No i am more of a "why have you let my glass get half empty you tight bd" type
Because you need room in the glass to allow for the wine's aromas to circulate it, so that you can appreciate it at its best (you ungrateful bd )?Edited by sidicks on Saturday 13th January 18:05
sidicks said:
citizensm1th said:
No i am more of a "why have you let my glass get half empty you tight bd" type
Because you need room in the glass to allow for the wine's aromas to circulate it, so that you can appreciate it at its best (you ungrateful bd )?Edited by sidicks on Saturday 13th January 18:05
Eddie Strohacker said:
I was talking about you, not to you. On the assumption your user name indicates the football team you follow, it then comes as no surprise you have trouble understanding simple concepts. Hippocrite that.
Are you still reluctantly here? Since when did I, or anyone else,need your assent to respond to
a post? Perhaps that constant flapping of wings has inadvertently
raised you above your station. What say you, Edward?
Eddie Strohacker said:
So, what hypocrisy exactly? why do you seem so keen to bandy that word about like confetti?
Because you are a hypocrite Eddie.My understanding is that you like to think you have a fairly liberal outlook i.e a philosophy of advocating freedom of the individual. Some might say, if they had read your post below, you are intensely proud of being liberal.
"swathes of black hearted reactionaries whose world view includes but is not limited to responding to people like me as snowflakes, libtards, country haters and so on. To me, those epithets are a matter of intense pride & so, fk those guys.
"fk those guys" and criticising alternative views whilst playing the liberal card is hypocritical. You may sincerely believe you have a liberal viewpoint but sadly your posts indicate you have nothing of the sort.
Apologies to the other posters on the thread. I'm out.
Edited by Crackie on Saturday 13th January 18:23
Crackie said:
My understanding is that you like to think you have a fairly liberal outlook i.e a philosophy of advocating freedom of the individual. Some might say, if they had read your post below, you are intensely proud of being liberal.
"swathes of black hearted reactionaries whose world view includes but is not limited to responding to people like me as snowflakes, libtards, country haters and so on. To me, those epithets are a matter of intense pride & so, fk those guys.
"fk those guys" and criticising alternative views whilst playing the liberal card is hypocritical. You may sincerely believe you have a liberal viewpoint but your posts prove you have nothing of the sort.
Ah, intolerance of intolerance isn't quite what you think it is, Cracker - not a typo, I think, since as noted above, you laid in unsolicited with an accusation of hypocrisy without bothering to explain yourself. Just another black hearted reactionary on a site stuffed from ahole to beak with them."swathes of black hearted reactionaries whose world view includes but is not limited to responding to people like me as snowflakes, libtards, country haters and so on. To me, those epithets are a matter of intense pride & so, fk those guys.
"fk those guys" and criticising alternative views whilst playing the liberal card is hypocritical. You may sincerely believe you have a liberal viewpoint but your posts prove you have nothing of the sort.
Edited by Eddie Strohacker on Saturday 13th January 18:27
Edited by Eddie Strohacker on Saturday 13th January 18:27
Eddie Strohacker said:
Ah, intolerance of intolerance isn't quite what you think it is, Cracker - not a typo, I think, since as noted above, you laid in unsolicited with an accusation of hypocrisy without bothering to explain yourself. Just another black hearted reactionary on a site stuffed from ahole to beak with them.
I'm back in........Edited by Eddie Strohacker on Saturday 13th January 18:27
Edited by Eddie Strohacker on Saturday 13th January 18:27
"Cracker - not a typo" Classy........
How do you think the sentence in bold reflects on you? Do you see any irony or hypocrisy for that matter?
I see that the fog lies dense in Brexitland, as usual.
The Dangerous Elk said:
Self-interested corrupt political organisation condemns and reclaims money from a person who is a pain in the arse to said self-interested corrupt political organisation.
Yep, quality Eu political based justice system in action. Our legal eagles here would sell their souls to support the Eu it seems. If that system operated in the Uk they would be screaming blue murder about the very same system being unjust.
…
Full investigation? LOL
As you say this has not been judged under any law but just by a self-interested committee (not even an independent one) with an "out to get him" attitude.
There is ZERO Due process.
...
The only information that is available is what you have read in the press on the announcement from a possibly biased organisation/committee (and certainly not an independent one), this as you know is NOT evidence is it
It remains to be seen if his rejection of the Eu action is taken to court to establish the clarity of judgment required to hang the man.
I refer you to the Eu "system" as noted above by another poster, pathetic and enlightening in its failure of accountability and control of taxpayers money.
Yep, quality Eu political based justice system in action. Our legal eagles here would sell their souls to support the Eu it seems. If that system operated in the Uk they would be screaming blue murder about the very same system being unjust.
…
Full investigation? LOL
As you say this has not been judged under any law but just by a self-interested committee (not even an independent one) with an "out to get him" attitude.
There is ZERO Due process.
...
The only information that is available is what you have read in the press on the announcement from a possibly biased organisation/committee (and certainly not an independent one), this as you know is NOT evidence is it
It remains to be seen if his rejection of the Eu action is taken to court to establish the clarity of judgment required to hang the man.
I refer you to the Eu "system" as noted above by another poster, pathetic and enlightening in its failure of accountability and control of taxpayers money.
Breadvan72 said:
Slecting lines to surport your assinine postion
Nice try my little bend to the wind lawyer, it is expected from you to clip out reasons why there is distrust and then use them as examples of a statement in your normal dishonest and biased way.The Dangerous Elk said:
Breadvan72 said:
You are blinded by your prejudice. There has been a full investigation and Farage has been found bang to rights. He has the right to appeal to the court if he wishes. Due process and the rule of law are not popular with some Brexiteers, but they are available to Farage.
The Dangerous Elk said:
As you say, not tested in ANY court just a self-interested and political committee. I would have thought you would be the first asking for an independent legal judgment on the matter by a court.
READ: I have not said he has or has not infringed any rules/broken any law, what I have said is the system is so biased due to its political nature that I do not trust it.
What really surprises me is your willingness to accept this decision considering the very obvious possibility of political involvement/lack of the possibility of a bias. It seems that you are happy to demand due process/legal judgement for one thing but not on a subject you wish for.
READ: I have not said he has or has not infringed any rules/broken any law, what I have said is the system is so biased due to its political nature that I do not trust it.
What really surprises me is your willingness to accept this decision considering the very obvious possibility of political involvement/lack of the possibility of a bias. It seems that you are happy to demand due process/legal judgement for one thing but not on a subject you wish for.
The Dangerous Elk said:
Which is quite plainly what I am saying (if others can get past their preconceptions/bias).
Look at who has passed this "judgment" and ask if that is free without questions on the possibility of bias.
In this discussion you are a prime example of You are blinded by your prejudice are you not ? Can you describe yourself as a "fair and independent" voice on this subject? Your record here would say no I think.Look at who has passed this "judgment" and ask if that is free without questions on the possibility of bias.
Full investigation? LOL
As you say this has not been judged under any law but just by a self-interested committee (not even an independent one) with an "out to get him" attitude.
There is ZERO Due process. As I said you would be the first jumping up and down & and shouting about the system/due process/"political justice" for any other reason.
Edited by The Dangerous Elk on Saturday 13th January 10:08[/footnote]
[footnote]Edited by The Dangerous Elk on Sunday 14th January 09:59Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff