More UKIP woes

Author
Discussion

sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
Zod said:
orry, busy morning. I must have missed it.

Why don't you do me a huge favour and quote your condemnation?
It’s posted twice. If you really wanted to see it, I’m sure you could find it!

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

127 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
Eddie Strohacker said:
TooMany2cvs said:
I really cannot understand why other people's relationships are an issue.
Or what the personal opinions of the German Chancellor have to do with a discussion on a(nother) racist UKIP member.
Oh, absolutely. Grade A whataboutism.

I'm just quite interested to see which way it'll go, and how much rope he'll end up hanging himself with.

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
sidicks said:
Zod said:
orry, busy morning. I must have missed it.

Why don't you do me a huge favour and quote your condemnation?
It’s posted twice. If you really wanted to see it, I’m sure you could find it!
I've just been for a coffee and went through the first eight pages and didn't find it. Go on, pretty please.

sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
eharding said:
I think sidicks is too busy avoiding my question - on who he thought BV was offending
Had anyone claimed that no-one in UKIP was racist or that UKIP had nothing to go with Brexit? If not, what was the purpose of BV’s post?


eharding said:
- to spend much time avoiding your question.
Maybe he can multitask though.
Not avoiding anything - it’s not up to me to repost things for those who are too lazy to read previous posts!

sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
Zod said:
I've just been for a coffee and went through the first eight pages and didn't find it. Go on, pretty please.
Seeing as you ask so nicely:

Sidicks said:
There was pretty much universal condemnation of the nasty individuals who are the topic of the thread.
Seems pretty clear to me.

eharding

13,740 posts

285 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
sidicks said:
eharding said:
I think sidicks is too busy avoiding my question - on who he thought BV was offending
Had anyone claimed that no-one in UKIP was racist or that UKIP had nothing to go with Brexit? If not, what was the purpose of BV’s post?
So, for the third time, was offended or incited by the post?

sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
eharding said:
So, for the third time, was offended or incited by the post?
I believed his post was designed to provoke / incite a response (else why did he write the nonsense that he did). Your opinion may differ.

Countdown

39,967 posts

197 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
Eddie Strohacker said:
TooMany2cvs said:
I really cannot understand why other people's relationships are an issue.
Or what the personal opinions of the German Chancellor have to do with a discussion on a(nother) racist UKIP member.
It’s 9th DAN level of Whatsbouttery.

Yes the leader of UKIP is porking a member of the hitler madchen but LOOK!! OVER THERE!! Angela Merkel might be a homophobe!!

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
sidicks said:
eharding said:
So, for the third time, was offended or incited by the post?
His post was designed to provoke / incite a response. HTH
Dude, it was a bit of sarcasm. You can Google that.

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
Strictly speaking, shouldn't awards for whataboutery be Soviet medals, as the USSR was the World champeen of whataboutism for most of its existence?

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
sidicks said:
Zod said:
I've just been for a coffee and went through the first eight pages and didn't find it. Go on, pretty please.
Seeing as you ask so nicely:

Sidicks said:
There was pretty much universal condemnation of the nasty individuals who are the topic of the thread.
Seems pretty clear to me.
I saw that. That comment is you reporting that others condemned it. It is not condemnation by you.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

127 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Strictly speaking, shouldn't awards for whataboutery be Soviet medals, as the USSR was the World champeen of whataboutism for most of its existence?
So, basically, the prime whatabouterers are fuelled by industrial quantities of hormones and steroids? That explains a lot...

sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
Zod said:
I saw that. That comment is you reporting that others condemned it. It is not condemnation by you.
So my reference to the ‘nasty individuals’ still leaves you confused?

It seems pretty conclusive and unambiguous to me!

gooner1

10,223 posts

180 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
sidicks said:
eharding said:
So, for the third time, was offended or incited by the post?
His post was designed to provoke / incite a response. HTH
Dude, it was a bit of sarcasm. You can Google that.
Sarcasm. To mock or convey contempt. Hmmmm scratchchin

eharding

13,740 posts

285 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
sidicks said:
eharding said:
So, for the third time, was offended or incited by the post?
I believed his post was designed to provoke / incite a response (else why did he write the nonsense that he did). Your opinion may differ.
So, in terms of incitement (to post a response, ad nauseam) the incited parties appear to be....you.

Could you also tell us who you assert was offended?

sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
eharding said:
So, in terms of incitement (to post a response, ad nauseam) the incited parties appear to be....you.

Could you also tell us who you assert was offended?
I’ve not said anyone was offended. HTH

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
Round,
Like a circle in a spiral
Like a wheel within a wheel
Never ending or beginning
On an ever-spinning reel
Like a snowball down a mountain
Or a carnival balloon
Like a carousel that's turning
Running rings around the moon
Like a clock whose hands are sweeping
Past the minutes of its face
And the world is like an apple
Rolling silently in space
Like the circles that you find
In the windmills of your mind

Like a tunnel that you follow
To a tunnel of its own
Down a hollow to a cavern
Where the sun has never shone
Like a door that keeps revolving
In a half-forgotten dream
All the ripples from a pebble
Someone tosses in a stream

Like a clock whose hands are sweeping
Past the minutes of its face
And the world is like an apple
Rolling silently in space
Like the circles that you find
In the windmills of your mind

Keys that jingle in your pocket
Words that jangle in your head
Why did summer go so quickly?
Was it something that you said?
Lovers walk along the shore
Leave their footprints in the sand
Is the sound of distant drumming
Just the fingers of your hand?
Pictures hanging in a hallway
Or the fragment of this song
Half-remembered names and faces
But to whom do they belong?
When you knew that it was over
You Were suddenly aware
That the autumn leaves were turning
To the colour of his hair?

Like a circle in a spiral
Like a wheel within a wheel
Never ending or beginning
On an ever-spinning reel
As the images unwind
Like the circles that you find
In the windmills of your mind

rscott

14,771 posts

192 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
sidicks said:
Zod said:
I saw that. That comment is you reporting that others condemned it. It is not condemnation by you.
So my reference to the ‘nasty individuals’ still leaves you confused?

It seems pretty conclusive and unambiguous to me!
It's certainly far more than FCR managed:-

Funkycoldribena said:
Breadvan72 said:
How about a ringing denunciation from you of the racism exhibited by Miz UKIP? Go on, surprise us. .
Nah.

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
sidicks said:
Zod said:
I saw that. That comment is you reporting that others condemned it. It is not condemnation by you.
So my reference to the ‘nasty individuals’ still leaves you confused?

It seems pretty conclusive and unambiguous to me!
It is indeed conclusive and unambiguous. Against you.

It's you reporting what others have previously said. Scroll up from that post though, and you're not one of the people who had previously said anything.

Ooops for you.

sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Monday 15th January 2018
quotequote all
rscott said:
It's certainly far more than FCR managed:-
I have no idea about this poster or his opinions, so definitely don’t want to be aligned with them!