Momentum finally takes control of Labour

Momentum finally takes control of Labour

Author
Discussion

Starfighter

4,927 posts

178 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
I suspect that the next election will be too late to stand on a policy of a second Brexit referendum, the UK will be out.

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

253 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
LoonyTunes said:
Johnnytheboy said:
Countdown said:
If Blair was in charge right now he'd walk it.
What saddens me (even as a core vote Tory) is that the Lib Dems seem utterly incapable of capitalising on what should be an open goal for them at the moment.
They could get more MP's than they've had in the last 100 years if they stood on a platform of promising a 2nd EU Referendum. Neither the Tories or Labour will do that. They also believe in staying in the EU so couldn't be accused of being hypocritical.

They may not get enough seats for an outright win but it's possible that they could be the biggest single party.

It's a bit of a slam-dunk to me.

Can't believe they won't see that opportunity at the next general election.
Aren't they already doing exactly that? And everyone is ignoring them.

Mark Benson

7,515 posts

269 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
LoonyTunes said:
Johnnytheboy said:
Countdown said:
If Blair was in charge right now he'd walk it.
What saddens me (even as a core vote Tory) is that the Lib Dems seem utterly incapable of capitalising on what should be an open goal for them at the moment.
They could get more MP's than they've had in the last 100 years if they stood on a platform of promising a 2nd EU Referendum. Neither the Tories or Labour will do that. They also believe in staying in the EU so couldn't be accused of being hypocritical.

They may not get enough seats for an outright win but it's possible that they could be the biggest single party.

It's a bit of a slam-dunk to me.

Can't believe they won't see that opportunity at the next general election.
Aren't they already doing exactly that? And everyone is ignoring them.
To the extent that if rumours are true, Vince Cable is standing down to let Gina Miller take the helm of the party.

Yet they still poll around the same level as UKIP.

Ean218

1,965 posts

250 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
LoonyTunes said:
They could get more MP's than they've had in the last 100 years if they stood on a platform of promising a 2nd EU Referendum. Neither the Tories or Labour will do that. They also believe in staying in the EU so couldn't be accused of being hypocritical.
They stood at the last election as the only party opposed to Brexit, fat lot of good it did them then. The poor sods even got Cable back to not lead them anywhere at all.

hidetheelephants

24,357 posts

193 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Also consider that most polls have a conservative bias, neck and neck does not look good for the Conservatives.
If the(decade overdue) boundary reforms go through(by no means guaranteed) the polls suddenly stop being biased and Labour stop being electable without a landslide-level upset.

NRS

22,171 posts

201 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
LoonyTunes said:
Jonesy23 said:
captain_cynic said:
The Tories are in disarray and have become ruled by a few extremists. Given the choice between Extremist A and Extremist B, they're going to pick the one that isn't already in power.

The Tories have lost their rank and file, the middle class voter by attempting to draw voters from UKIP. The Tories need to take a solid lurch back towards the centre to gain them back.
U wot m8?

The biggest problem the Conservatives currently have is that they're firmly camped in the centre, having basically morphed into a version of New Labour.

Actual conservative policies and politicians have been pushed to the back. The leadership is all woolly liberals.

If they need to move anywhere it isn't to the centre.
I think you'll find that the Tories are currently right wing it's just many on here would like them to move to the far-right.
What are they right wing on, compared to say Labour under Blair? Brexit is cross-parties, and is basically far right and far left supporting it, so that isn't one to me.

Bullett

10,886 posts

184 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
In the middle of a parliament with a tory party hated by large swathes of the country and presiding over Brexit and with a PM the majority think is rubbish Labour should be so far ahead in the polls they could walk and election.
That they are not speaks volumes.

Starfighter

4,927 posts

178 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
International anti-sematism rules now adopted in full.

It will be interesting to how this gets spun.

motco

15,956 posts

246 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
Starfighter said:
International anti-sematism rules now adopted in full.

It will be interesting to how this gets spun.
Yes, and what past events are dredged up to show conflict with that definition. They didn't resist the adoption so strongly for nothing.

Diderot

7,319 posts

192 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
Starfighter said:
International anti-sematism rules now adopted in full.
But with a caveat attached.

BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45414656

A Labour statement said: "The NEC has today adopted all of the IHRA (the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance) examples of anti-Semitism, in addition to the IHRA definition which Labour adopted in 2016, alongside a statement which ensures this will not in any way undermine freedom of expression on Israel or the rights of Palestinians. [....]"




The Dangerous Elk

Original Poster:

4,642 posts

77 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all

dasigty

587 posts

81 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
This is wishful thinking on your part. All the polling in the run up to the GE had Labour ahead, so did the exit poll. All were wrong, shy tory is a bigger factor than your inherent bias.

No one is going to mix the two parties up, its clear - vote for Corbyn is to vote for a Jew hating extremist, who wants to re nationalise industries, give power to the unions, squeeze the middle until the pips squeak, borrow, tax and bring in terrible identity politics to every public institution. A man whose Black Shirt thugs hound a decent man like Frank Field for having the temerity to defy the Labour whip on three occasions under Corbyn. Corbyn who himself on 483 occasions voted with the Conservatives against Labour Policy....


I can't see any of the Blair/Cameron middle accidentally voting for Corbyn. If you ever fancied a crack at being an independent, this could be YOUR election !



Could not have put it better myself ;0),
If only everyone had the sense to ignore any "Professional politician" from all parties and give their vote to an independent who shares at least some of their views the normal two party state would get a real and much needed kick up the arse, the lot of them stopped representing the voters a long time ago.

The Dangerous Elk

Original Poster:

4,642 posts

77 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
dasigty said:
Could not have put it better myself ;0),
If only everyone had the sense to ignore any "Professional politician" from all parties and give their vote to an independent who shares at least some of their views the normal two party state would get a real and much needed kick up the arse, the lot of them stopped representing the voters a long time ago.
and.....5.4.3.2.1......... Trump

LoonyTunes

3,362 posts

75 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
NRS said:
What are they right wing on, compared to say Labour under Blair? Brexit is cross-parties, and is basically far right and far left supporting it, so that isn't one to me.
Taxation for a start.

Hereward

4,185 posts

230 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
LoonyTunes said:
NRS said:
What are they right wing on, compared to say Labour under Blair? Brexit is cross-parties, and is basically far right and far left supporting it, so that isn't one to me.
Taxation for a start.
Taxation? Under the Tories I have lost my entire annual personal allowance, child benefit and pension incentives.

otolith

56,135 posts

204 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
I think there are a lot of voters who simply want a government which will maintain the economic status quo without actually going out of their way to st on the poor.

hidetheelephants

24,357 posts

193 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
otolith said:
I think there are a lot of voters who simply want a government which will maintain the economic status quo without actually going out of their way to st on the poor.
The status quo sts on the poor; what do you want, a miracle?

swamp

994 posts

189 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
Hereward said:
Taxation? Under the Tories I have lost my entire annual personal allowance, child benefit and pension incentives.
The personal allowance withdrawal was actually Labour in 2009, but Tories could have rolled it back.

UK marginal tax rates are 65% and 60% for the above (3 kids). They go any higher and people will just work less.


The Dangerous Elk

Original Poster:

4,642 posts

77 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
swamp said:
The personal allowance withdrawal was actually Labour in 2009, but Tories could have rolled it back.

UK marginal tax rates are 65% and 60% for the above (3 kids). They go any higher and people will just work less.
as a 100% blue blood, I have to accept the tax take is high atm, so it should be. We are all still in Pay-Back mode thanks to labour.

nikaiyo2

4,732 posts

195 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
otolith said:
I think there are a lot of voters who simply want a government which will maintain the economic status quo without actually going out of their way to st on the poor.
Do you mean the status quo of the naughties when the government was spending money like it’s was someone else’s?

When you say “stting on the poor” I assume you mean stop borrowing money to pay people, I am not sure that qualifies as stting on.