45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. (Vol 4)
Discussion
p1stonhead said:
Friend sent me this he cut from reddit (one of his supporters sections) about the bill he just signed
The delusion is incredible. Or it’s satire, but who can even tell these days.
he pissed off a lot of people on T_D there were disappointed people before when he did things they didn't like but never like yesterday, maybe he is just too bored with his new job so he is looking for a way out The delusion is incredible. Or it’s satire, but who can even tell these days.
Edited by p1stonhead on Saturday 24th March 10:42
Ann Coulter is a nasty piee of work, and pretty disengenuous at times.
Hiring Bush pleb, PNAC character Bolton though would be the sort of thing the crazies like
erm, I don't think it's too much of a controversy to say that Trump hasn't got any plans, goals, maps etc, he just makes snap decisions that may completely contradict what he did the day previously. Pretty crazy. I hope the North Korea thing comes off.
Hiring Bush pleb, PNAC character Bolton though would be the sort of thing the crazies like
erm, I don't think it's too much of a controversy to say that Trump hasn't got any plans, goals, maps etc, he just makes snap decisions that may completely contradict what he did the day previously. Pretty crazy. I hope the North Korea thing comes off.
FN2TypeR said:
satire, surely?
You say that and then you see areout repeat much of the reddit threads on hereThe last was
AreOut said:
Brennan, the guy who personally green-lit the 9/11 hijackers entry into the US after being informed that lower level agents had flagged their passports due to potential terror concerns?
9/11 was a deep state CIA sponsored event according to areout.He has some equally good ideas about the missing malaysian plane
Edited by Byker28i on Saturday 24th March 12:54
Anenatti, daniels lawyer is ramping up the rhetoric, telling trump and cohen to start telling the truth and come clean..
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/380061...
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/380061...
AreOut said:
Byker28i said:
9/11 was a deep state CIA sponsored event according to areout.
I didn't say that. It could be just a human error intelligence officials make around the world on a daily basis.Byker28i said:
FN2TypeR said:
satire, surely?
You say that and then you see areout repeat much of the reddit threads on hereThe last was
AreOut said:
Brennan, the guy who personally green-lit the 9/11 hijackers entry into the US after being informed that lower level agents had flagged their passports due to potential terror concerns?
9/11 was a deep state CIA sponsored event according to areout.He has some equally good ideas about the missing malaysian plane
Edited by Byker28i on Saturday 24th March 12:54
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fkspzzfgfmg
even Tucker is pissed...there is no chance Trump could recover from this unless he pulls something extraordinary like denuclearization of NK or similar
even Tucker is pissed...there is no chance Trump could recover from this unless he pulls something extraordinary like denuclearization of NK or similar
rscott said:
Still waiting for any evidence for your claim that Brennan was personally responsible for letting them in. Or do you finally admit that claim was uttter horsest?
As a deputy executive director is there any chance he didn't know? And if he did he was responsible, that's just how it is. I also tend to believe some sources posting on sites you don't want to visit, simply because they proved to be right several times before. Are they anonymous intelligence officers or someone close to them or even someone who got so lucky with his "crazy" theories I don't know.AreOut said:
As a deputy executive director is there any chance he didn't know? And if he did he was responsible, that's just how it is. I also tend to believe some sources posting on sites you don't want to visit, simply because they proved to be right several times before. Are they anonymous intelligence officers or someone close to them or even someone who got so lucky with his "crazy" theories I don't know.
Plenty. In fact the higher up you are in an organisation the further you are from the coal face, so there’s plenty of chance that he didn’t know.Your argument is akin to saying Bush MUST have known because he was Prez.
AreOut said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fkspzzfgfmg
even Tucker is pissed...there is no chance Trump could recover from this unless he pulls something extraordinary like denuclearization of NK or similar
Then post links to these sites so others can evaluate your claims. even Tucker is pissed...there is no chance Trump could recover from this unless he pulls something extraordinary like denuclearization of NK or similar
rscott said:
Still waiting for any evidence for your claim that Brennan was personally responsible for letting them in. Or do you finally admit that claim was uttter horsest?
As a deputy executive director is there any chance he didn't know? And if he did he was responsible, that's just how it is. I also tend to believe some sources posting on sites you don't want to visit, simply because they proved to be right several times before. Are they anonymous intelligence officers or someone close to them or even someone who got so lucky with his "crazy" theories I don't know.I doubt he personally vetted the applications. He may have been involved in setting the guidelines the lower ranking staff member applied to those cases, but we don't know what they were or if they were applied correctly.
AreOut said:
even Tucker is pissed...there is no chance Trump could recover from this unless he pulls something extraordinary like nuking NK or similar
Edited for morelikelyness.Someone asked earlier what was the issue with the budget bill Trump signed off in a hurry so he could play golf - this might illuminate:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/03/23...
rscott said:
Then post links to these sites so others can evaluate your claims.
I doubt he personally vetted the applications. He may have been involved in setting the guidelines the lower ranking staff member applied to those cases, but we don't know what they were or if they were applied correctly.
I'm too lazy to dig for them now sorry.I doubt he personally vetted the applications. He may have been involved in setting the guidelines the lower ranking staff member applied to those cases, but we don't know what they were or if they were applied correctly.
He is responsible for actions of his subordinates whatever way you turn it.
AreOut said:
rscott said:
Then post links to these sites so others can evaluate your claims.
I doubt he personally vetted the applications. He may have been involved in setting the guidelines the lower ranking staff member applied to those cases, but we don't know what they were or if they were applied correctly.
I'm too lazy to dig for them now sorry.I doubt he personally vetted the applications. He may have been involved in setting the guidelines the lower ranking staff member applied to those cases, but we don't know what they were or if they were applied correctly.
He is responsible for actions of his subordinates whatever way you turn it.
Hopefully next time you make wild claims, you'll link to the evidence..
AreOut said:
it's interesting you don't require any evidence for claims about "russian collusion" or similar bs?
Where have I accused Trump of collusion? I've followed the Mueller investigation carefully which has shown that certain members of his team have acted unlawfully (confirmed by their guilty pleas). Until the investigation is concluded, we won't know for sure.I do criticise his excessive golfing (verified by all the media, even Fox) and his comedic tweets.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff