45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. (Vol 4)

[IJB1959]

Lentilist said:

Childish and silly by their own admission, but fun nonetheless...

https://www.facebook.com/trumpidiot/

And quite possible!!......would love to see it happen.

[IJB1959]

Eric Mc said:

They've been in charge ever since this song was in the charts -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXIoEl53T-I

Forgot to add the Rothchild's as well. They are all Illuminati.

[BJG1]

rscott said:

That there are vested interests in removing Trump from the White House regardless of whether he's committed a crime or not and that Trump is a pathological liar are not mutually exclusive.

[p1stonhead]

BJG1 said:

rscott said:

That there are vested interests in removing Trump from the White House regardless of whether he's committed a crime or not and that Trump is a pathological liar are not mutually exclusive.

This applies to anyone in office. There is always someone who’s interest it would be in if they were not there.

[BJG1]

p1stonhead said:

This applies to anyone in office. There is always someone who’s interest it would be in if they were not there.

Surely you're not pig-headed enough to not concede it applies much more to Trump?

[p1stonhead]

BJG1 said:

p1stonhead said:

This applies to anyone in office. There is always someone who’s interest it would be in if they were not there.

Surely you're not pig-headed enough to not concede it applies much more to Trump?

No I don’t concede that at all.

[BJG1]

p1stonhead said:

No I don’t concede that at all.

You don't think it's in more people's interest that Trump isn't president than Obama? Do you think he's an averagely competent president then? :s

[paulguitar]

coyft said:

Trying to use logic on someone suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome will get you nowhere!

Give up now, before you're banned.

I think to get banned, coyft, one has to do something ban-worthy? For example, 50-mustang with his ‘liberal tears gun oil’ post mocking the dead children of the Sandy-Hook massacre.

I would also be curious to know, as a Trump supporter, what did you think of his ‘Birther’ campaign?

[Escapegoat]

coyft said:

Trying to use logic on someone suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome will get you nowhere!

Give up now, before you're banned.

Oh, good, you're back. I thought you'd got fed up, but it's good to see you are happy to stay and discuss Trump. Because I'm still waiting for an answer:

Escapegoat said:

coyft said:

If his wealth is derived and protected by criminal means, he’s been very smart in evading the law!

I actually asked: is that a problem for you?

Is it?

[JonChalk]

coyft said:

paulguitar said:

I would also be curious to know, as a Trump supporter, what did you think of his ‘Birther’ campaign?

I don't support any politician.

Politicians will say anything to get elected.

So, do you or don't you support Trump? You answered like a politician, i.e. deflected and avoided.

[Seventy]

coyft said:

I don't support any politician.

Politicians will say anything to get elected.

Have you ever voted?

[BJG1]

JonChalk said:

So, do you or don't you support Trump?

coyft said:

I don't support any politician.

a 5 year old would find that an unambiguous answer

[JonChalk]

coyft said:

Last time I looked Trump was a politician.

Ah, so you are a brain-dead bot, or a brain-dead troll, which is it?

You definitely and clearly don't support Trump (Trump = politician, and you don't support politicians) and are just having a bit of fun trolling this thread, then?

[paulguitar]

coyft said:

paulguitar said:

I would also be curious to know, as a Trump supporter, what did you think of his ‘Birther’ campaign?

I don't support any politician.

Politicians will say anything to get elected.

Okay, let me re-phrase the question.

What did you think of Trump’s ‘Birther’ campaign?

[Seventy]

Seventy said:

coyft said:

I don't support any politician.

Politicians will say anything to get elected.

Have you ever voted?

[JonChalk]

coyft said:

It doesn't have to be binary. Life rarely is.

Your previous statements were binary however. YOUR statements - a reflection of you and your views. YOU expressed binary views.

Now you're wheedling out of it, just like a politician, or someone who blusters and makes random statements without thinking them through.

[BJG1]

JonChalk said:

Your previous statements were binary however. YOUR statements - a reflection of you and your views. YOU expressed binary views.

How can you have a binary opinion or view?

[JonChalk]

coyft said:

Wheedling out of what?

If you support Trump, who is a politician, which you don't support, then you can't support Trump.

Which is it? Do you support Trump, yes or no?

[BJG1]

JonChalk said:

If you support Trump, who is a politician, which you don't support, then you can't support Trump.

Which is it? Do you support Trump, yes or no?

[JonChalk]

BJG1 said:

How can you have a binary opinion or view?

Of course you can - I hold the the very binary view, with no grey area, that Trump is a complete arse. No doubts, no excuses, absolute unwavering opinion of mine.

I have a less than binary view of whether diesel is a bad fuel or not - it has merits (Trump has none), but on balance I believe it is slightly more harmful than petrol. However, this is not an absolute - I don't hate it, I don't hate people who drive diesels - there is scope in my opinion for it to be modified or varied.

A 1 is a 1, a 0 is a 0 - no room for it to be varied or modified.