Tommy Robinson attacked at McDonald’s
Discussion
ReverendCounter said:
rscott said:
No comment on the statement that the evidence was found to be at odds with her claims or the explanation as to why there's been no mainstream media coverage (she asked them not to cover it)
So you're ignoring the fact that the woman asked for a review - why did she do that? Could it be that the evidence the police are basing the earlier decision on is incomplete or does not take into account additional evidence?Have charges been brought against her by the alleged rapists for defamation/slander? Of course not. Has any complaint been brought against her at all? Of course not.
Do you recall evidence being withheld in the very recent rape case which exonerated the true victim (the male, of course - due to the thousands of suppressed text messages)? There is a grave mistrust of the police given the, shall we say, 'cultural sensitivity' surrounding this particular matter.
What about the vast swathes of evidence in the huge multitudes of Child Sexual Exploitation cases which was ignored, with the fathers of girls who pushed for action from the police, threatened with arrest and jail? Clearly the police have a history of very, very poor performance where CSE and muslim/asian/immigrant rape gangs are concerned.
Talking of 'no comment on the statement...', do you have any comment on the innocent German women being spat on, attacked and abused by their fellow Germans for simply voicing their fear of rape and abuse, which Robinson brought to light?
That, due to Robinson's questioning of German media present, these innocent, scared women and others attending the rally were being presented by German mainstream media as 'far right' protesters?
All rhetorical questions of course, because I am grateful to Tommy Robinson and his type who bring these matters to our attention and I will never be dissuaded from seeking out other sources of information, despite the rabid hatred for him being shown on PH.
Not sure anyone publicly named the alleged attackers, so they couldn't have been slandered/libelled.
rscott said:
I'm not at all surprised that you're grateful to Robinson for his take on the news.
Not sure anyone publicly named the alleged attackers, so they couldn't have been slandered/libelled.
Not sure anyone publicly named the alleged attackers, so they couldn't have been slandered/libelled.
Edited by ReverendCounter on Monday 12th March 21:48
ReverendCounter said:
If it's fake, wouldn't it leave Robinson open to prosecution and costs for the van, officers etc?
Does anyone really, seriously think that, given the multiple arrests, claims of police harassment in the past, house searches etc etc, Robinson is so desperate for attention that he will risk a very real conviction by wasting their time like that?
Are you lot claiming 'fake' really that dense?!
+1Does anyone really, seriously think that, given the multiple arrests, claims of police harassment in the past, house searches etc etc, Robinson is so desperate for attention that he will risk a very real conviction by wasting their time like that?
Are you lot claiming 'fake' really that dense?!
ReverendCounter said:
If it's fake, wouldn't it leave Robinson open to prosecution and costs for the van, officers etc?
Does anyone really, seriously think that, given the multiple arrests, claims of police harassment in the past, house searches etc etc, Robinson is so desperate for attention that he will risk a very real conviction by wasting their time like that?
His whole shtick is that he is the poor victim, persecuted by the state. I'm sure he would like nothing more than that very real conviction to bleat about to his hard of thinking followers.Does anyone really, seriously think that, given the multiple arrests, claims of police harassment in the past, house searches etc etc, Robinson is so desperate for attention that he will risk a very real conviction by wasting their time like that?
Dindoit said:
Have a good watch of the video, especially the kicks. They barely touch him. He’s escaped with no injuries whatsoever. If you’re on the floor getting “kicked” by half a dozen men you get bruises at best, broken bones at worst.
i am not very keen on robinson, the edl thing is enough to mark him out as a bit of a clown for me. however i did watch the video and you will see some blood on his ear if you look closely , possibly from a kick while he was on the ground.i don't think it is a coincidence he keeps getting involved in physical conflict and it could easily be avoided if he made some better choices,but i don't think this incident has been faked.quite often a group of people trying to give someone a kicking get in each others way and cause far less damage as a result. having been in a similar situation (for apparently looking at someone in a group the wrong way, not being a racist) i was thankful that was the case.
ninjacost said:
mx5nut said:
For such a peaceful man, he never goes long between finding an excuse for a punch up. Probably happens to buddhist monks all the time.
Fights back when provoked ,nothing wrong with that in my book .bananaman1 said:
Spent a couple of hours watching tommy`s videos over the weekend........not what I was expecting at all.Seemed pretty clued up on his choosen subject.....not the thug I was expecting.....dare I say ....made a lot on sense too:-/.......pretty ballsy fella.
"Qualities" he shares with most other hate preachers. They're pretty essential for radicalising others.ReverendCounter said:
rscott said:
He often seems
'often'...'seems'In other words, you can't be less vague about something you won't substantiate.
An observation that somehow he has to retaliate with violence before any punches are thrown by those he's retaliating against.
He's got prior convictions for violence, so isn't exactly squeaky clean..
rscott said:
It was sarcasm, something you failed to comprehend.
An observation that somehow he has to retaliate with violence before any punches are thrown by those he's retaliating against.
He's got prior convictions for violence, so isn't exactly squeaky clean..
Sarcasm the lowest form of wit , very apt :-)An observation that somehow he has to retaliate with violence before any punches are thrown by those he's retaliating against.
He's got prior convictions for violence, so isn't exactly squeaky clean..
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff