Tommy Robinson attacked at McDonald’s

[Mr2Mike]

Alpinestars said:

It was his attempt at humour. But quite telling of him.

Aww diddums

Some moisturizer might help the chaffing on your hands.

[Mr2Mike]

desolate said:

For Mr2M that's what passes as humour.

I would imagine he's trying to get someone to get all indignant that he has called all muslims dirty bds when it's ok for others to say the same about Tommy Robinson and his supporters - then he can have some sort of pathetic whiney moan about one rule for them and other for our lads.

I achieved exactly what I wanted. Thank you for your assistance

[anonymous-user]

Mr2Mike said:

I achieved exactly what I wanted. Thank you for your assistance

Did you?

From the way I read it you got zero bites.

[Alpinestars]

Mr2Mike said:

Alpinestars said:

It was his attempt at humour. But quite telling of him.

Aww diddums

Some moisturizer might help the chaffing on your hands.

I didn’t say I was bothered by it Mike, just making the point that it reinforces your views. Don’t get too upset.

[rscott]

IforB said:

Alpinestars said:

rscott said:

Tommy won't be getting his US visa - https://uk.news.yahoo.com/tommy-robinson-fails-u-v...

Slippery national censorship slope the US is starting to travel down really gives me sleepless nights.

Convicted criminals rarely get given visas to enter the US for a good reason. They are convicted criminals...

Love the "slippery slope" nonsense you lot always come out with. It's always garbage.

If you are having sleepless nights, that's purely down to the fact that your brain is struggling to process the absolute nonsense you make it come up with, it's feeling guilty about the awfulness that's contained within it.
The poor thing.

Parrot required please!

[anonymous-user]

AW111 said:

Roman Rhodes said:

Utter bks. You've made lots of comments apart from the hopeless logical fallacy of "slippery slope". Are you deranged or just a compulsive liar?

Why is that an either/or question? Can't we have both?

Oh go on then, probably a fair call!

[Dindoit]

rscott said:

Tommy won't be getting his US visa - https://uk.news.yahoo.com/tommy-robinson-fails-u-v...

There just stoping Tommy from speeching the troof. Freeze peach!

Is how it'll be played out by the mouth breathers. If you were to ask them if they thought immigrants with criminal convictions should be allowed into the UK you know the answer.

[Not-The-Messiah]

Think we may have some sort of possible agreement on this. It's a good idea for American and the UK to not allow criminals to enter.

For this to happen we need a system that is capable of checking people thoroughly before they arrive just like the US system. And for us not to tolerate illegal immigration. As the act of entering illegally makes them by definition criminals.

[lyonspride]

Not-The-Messiah said:

Think we may have some sort of possible agreement on this. It's a good idea for American and the UK to not allow criminals to enter.

For this to happen we need a system that is capable of checking people thoroughly before they arrive just like the US system. And for us not to tolerate illegal immigration. As the act of entering illegally makes them by definition criminals.

So how do you explain Calais? How can they be criminals if they're all children and brain surgeons?

[NoNeed]

Dindoit said:

rscott said:

Tommy won't be getting his US visa - https://uk.news.yahoo.com/tommy-robinson-fails-u-v...

There just stoping Tommy from speeching the troof. Freeze peach!

Is how it'll be played out by the mouth breathers. If you were to ask them if they thought immigrants with criminal convictions should be allowed into the UK you know the answer.

Nope, rules are rules and if Tommy does not met the set standards then that is his fault, it is a shame that we don't set any standards

[graylag]

NoNeed said:

Nope, rules are rules and if Tommy does not met the set standards then that is his fault, it is a shame that we don't set any standards

PayPal?

[NoNeed]

graylag said:

NoNeed said:

Nope, rules are rules and if Tommy does not met the set standards then that is his fault, it is a shame that we don't set any standards

PayPal?

Same, except it is paypal not playing by their own rules in not completing the transactions. I said it before that they can choose to do business with whomever they wish, but they have decided to stop payments to his account instead retrospectively and before he had any knowledge of a problem or a concern.

Edited by NoNeed on Tuesday 13th November 15:26

[IforB]

NoNeed said:

graylag said:

NoNeed said:

Nope, rules are rules and if Tommy does not met the set standards then that is his fault, it is a shame that we don't set any standards

PayPal?

Same, except it is paypal not playing by their own rules in not completing the transactions. I said it before that they can choose to do business with whomever they wish, but they have decided to stop payments to his account instead retrospectively and before he had any knowledge of a problem or a concern.

Edited by NoNeed on Tuesday 13th November 15:26

Garbage. A company can change its T&C’s whenever it likes. If you don’t like that as a customer, you are also free not to use them.

Stop whinging. It’s all I ever Yaxley-Lennon supporters do. It is pathetic.

[rscott]

NoNeed said:

Dindoit said:

rscott said:

Tommy won't be getting his US visa - https://uk.news.yahoo.com/tommy-robinson-fails-u-v...

There just stoping Tommy from speeching the troof. Freeze peach!

Is how it'll be played out by the mouth breathers. If you were to ask them if they thought immigrants with criminal convictions should be allowed into the UK you know the answer.

Nope, rules are rules and if Tommy does not met the set standards then that is his fault, it is a shame that we don't set any standards

Strange that - we don't set any standards, yet managed to not allow these three in..

[TTwiggy]

Not-The-Messiah said:

Think we may have some sort of possible agreement on this. It's a good idea for American and the UK to not allow criminals to enter.

For this to happen we need a system that is capable of checking people thoroughly before they arrive just like the US system. And for us not to tolerate illegal immigration. As the act of entering illegally makes them by definition criminals.

How are we 'tolerating' illegal immigration? Our view of it is rather given away by its name.

[ape x]

That fat one with no shirt on..... I still can't get how these people deal with poppy day....
They must be so conflicted. I imagine old no shirt would of worn a poppy on the same side as his swastika..... utter fking morons....
And there are Tommy's people, has he ever publicly distanced himself from them?

[Alpinestars]

ape x said:

That fat one with no shirt on..... I still can't get how these people deal with poppy day....
They must be so conflicted. I imagine old no shirt would of worn a poppy on the same side as his swastika..... utter fking morons....
And there are Tommy's people, has he ever publicly distanced himself from them?

OUCH! It’s a PH photo shoot.

[rscott]

NoNeed said:

graylag said:

NoNeed said:

Nope, rules are rules and if Tommy does not met the set standards then that is his fault, it is a shame that we don't set any standards

PayPal?

Same, except it is paypal not playing by their own rules in not completing the transactions. I said it before that they can choose to do business with whomever they wish, but they have decided to stop payments to his account instead retrospectively and before he had any knowledge of a problem or a concern.

Edited by NoNeed on Tuesday 13th November 15:26

They are playing by their rules ( the ones Tommy agreed to when he signed up for a PayPal account). Those rules allow them to freeze funds temporarily. They'll then either release them to Tommy or return them to the sources (who also agreed to abide by those rules when they used the payment processor).

[The Dangerous Elk]

Alpinestars said:

ape x said:

That fat one with no shirt on..... I still can't get how these people deal with poppy day....
They must be so conflicted. I imagine old no shirt would of worn a poppy on the same side as his swastika..... utter fking morons....
And there are Tommy's people, has he ever publicly distanced himself from them?

OUCH! It’s a PH photo shoot.

Top Right 2nd in....luckiest of them all, he face is covered.

[Alpinestars]

The Dangerous Elk said:

Top Right 2nd in....luckiest of them all, he face is covered.

Family shot?




Only joking!