Tommy Robinson attacked at McDonald’s
Discussion
The Dangerous Elk said:
Quote me making such a statement in defence of any of his "abhorrent views" or "objectionable thoughts" or be seen as a liar and a troll.
Blah, blah the fact you’re dancing around the issue and too pathetic to actually own up to your views isn’t making you appear clever. You defend TR to the hilt, never criticise him, but pretend you don’t like him. You’re like a child in a school playground to afraid to admit he fancies the girl in the corner.
The Dangerous Elk said:
Roman Rhodes said:
Ah, those objectionable thoughts that you're incapable of defining. Understood.
You're an apologist for SYL. Pretending that you think he has "abhorrent views" or "objectionable thoughts" isn't a very good disguise.
Quote me making such a statement in defence of any of his "abhorrent views" or "objectionable thoughts" or be seen as a liar and a troll.You're an apologist for SYL. Pretending that you think he has "abhorrent views" or "objectionable thoughts" isn't a very good disguise.
The Dangerous Elk said:
Another one who cannot back up his bullst accusation with a single quote of me backing any give example of a TR vomit of words you think I may support..
All can see you for what you claim I am, so sad you do this in full view of everybody.
There are pages and pages and pages on here where you’re defending his situation. You never support any of his detractors in any situation. You are incapable of providing any evidence that you find any of his views abhorrent, despite continuing to claim that you do (excluding the facile comment around cats). So I’ll call you out on it and continue to do so, until you either stand up and publicly denounce him, or most likely, admit to being a supporter and apologist for him. All can see you for what you claim I am, so sad you do this in full view of everybody.
graylag said:
The Dangerous Elk said:
No. I know not one person who is an apologist for any of TR's wide ranging objectionable thoughts.
Here’s one, although you’ll probably claim not to know him personally, so it doesn’t count. liam1986 said:
Please watch his Oxford union speach. It will enlighten you.
Anyway Elk, you know not one person? Are you even reading this fking thread?
The Dangerous Elk said:
Roman Rhodes said:
Ah, those objectionable thoughts that you're incapable of defining. Understood.
You're an apologist for SYL. Pretending that you think he has "abhorrent views" or "objectionable thoughts" isn't a very good disguise.
Quote me making such a statement in defence of any of his "abhorrent views" or "objectionable thoughts" or be seen as a liar and a troll.You're an apologist for SYL. Pretending that you think he has "abhorrent views" or "objectionable thoughts" isn't a very good disguise.
Just be honest about your love for SYL - you'll feel a weight lift from your shoulders!
_dobbo_ said:
graylag said:
The Dangerous Elk said:
No. I know not one person who is an apologist for any of TR's wide ranging objectionable thoughts.
Here’s one, although you’ll probably claim not to know him personally, so it doesn’t count. liam1986 said:
Please watch his Oxford union speach. It will enlighten you.
Anyway Elk, you know not one person? Are you even reading this fking thread?
Have any of you actually watch'd his Oxford union speech. It would give you some perspective on how he has got himself into his current situation.
Roman Rhodes said:
Oh dear, you don't like being 'outed' do you?! Look in the mirror if you're trying to find a liar and a troll. The fact that you can't define any of his thoughts and views as abhorrent or objectionable rather unravels your pretence.
Just be honest about your love for SYL - you'll feel a weight lift from your shoulders!
Outed.....in what way ? , You cannot even seem to gather a single quote or ask me a straight question.Just be honest about your love for SYL - you'll feel a weight lift from your shoulders!
Don't make me laugh I have just eaten.
bhstewie said:
The Dangerous Elk said:
No
I regard him as an Islamophobe
Just curious but why did you edit/delete your previous reply which simply said "Yes"?I regard him as an Islamophobe
Edit to add why:
The use of the terms “nazi”, “fascist” or “racist is a misuse and in reality just undervalues those terms as well as revealing a lack of understanding (of them), this reduces the ability challenge the unpleasant idiots mutterings.
Edited by The Dangerous Elk on Thursday 15th November 19:09
liam1986 said:
Nearly all day for the spelling mistake to be picked up. That is surprizing.
Have any of you actually watch'd his Oxford union speech. It would give you some perspective on how he has got himself into his current situation.
Surprizing and watch’d. I’ll pick these up quickly for you. Have any of you actually watch'd his Oxford union speech. It would give you some perspective on how he has got himself into his current situation.
I haven’t watched him, I have no interest in watching him either. His background is well documented as a football hooligan, fraudster, illegal immigrant and racist. He’s now simply turning his ability to spread hate into a cash cow. I’ll give him that, he’s done that very cleverly. He is a poor debater and orator though to anyone with a modicum of intelligence.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff