Three killed after being hit by a train in London.

[TriumphStag3.0V8]

Roman Rhodes said:

Every fking thread. Stay classy!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ON-7v4qnHP8

It IS classy. What isn't classy is being a scumbag who vandalises other people's property or being the kind of fool that supports them because it's "art"

[Downward]

We have/had to deal with this cokc in our area. Tagging every traffic sign post and landmark on a 10 mile bus route.

Still not cleaned off many of his tags to this day.

Notice how the press word this article, No artist, juat vandal, crime etc

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/s...

[amusingduck]

Resolutionary said:

Cold said:

Yes, the owners of the defaced property may well find it thuggish and scummy and many do. They are the most important opinions in these situations. Critical acclaim from third parties mean little to those who have to pay for ongoing repairs to their damaged property.

I expect if someone really wanted graffiti to be sprayed across something they own then they'd either do it themselves or ask a non-splattered "artist" to express themselves. That's not liking different things, that's liking your things to be left alone.

Train companies and the like build repair and repaint costs into their business models, have done for ages. Not ideal at all, but a necessary part of the industry. Just like Facebook et al set aside money for fines they'll inevitably face for data breaches and so on.

And for the record, although I suspect you know this, many graffiti artists are commissioned by all sorts of businesses for branding and marketing projects, globally.

Retailers build loss prevention into their business models. It doesn't make theft acceptable.

It sounds like you're saying that because people are already trying to mitigate harm/loss, it somehow excuses the reasons they have to do so.

[anonymous-user]

TriumphStag3.0V8 said:

Roman Rhodes said:

Every fking thread. Stay classy!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ON-7v4qnHP8

It IS classy. What isn't classy is being a scumbag who vandalises other people's property or being the kind of fool that supports them because it's "art"

I’d say there’s a lot more ‘class’ in the posts Resolutionary has been making - interesting and thoughtful stuff without the tedious judgmental cliches or a need to be constantly going on about his own accomplishments.

[poo at Paul's]

Roman Rhodes said:

TriumphStag3.0V8 said:

Roman Rhodes said:

Every fking thread. Stay classy!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ON-7v4qnHP8

It IS classy. What isn't classy is being a scumbag who vandalises other people's property or being the kind of fool that supports them because it's "art"

I’d say there’s a lot more ‘class’ in the posts Resolutionary has been making - interesting and thoughtful stuff without the tedious judgmental cliches or a need to be constantly going on about his own accomplishments.

Accomplishments, no, but he does keep banging on about his and his mate's vandalism. How classy!

[Smiler.]

Roman Rhodes said:

I’d say there’s a lot more ‘class’ in the posts Resolutionary has been making - interesting and thoughtful stuff without the tedious judgmental cliches or a need to be constantly going on about his own accomplishments.

I wonder if your view would remain the same if one of these talent-free wazzocks "improved" every one your garden fence panels.

Of course it would.

[Pothole]

Downward said:

We have/had to deal with this cokc in our area. Tagging every traffic sign post and landmark on a 10 mile bus route.

Still not cleaned off many of his tags to this day.

Notice how the press word this article, No artist, juat vandal, crime etc

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/s...

That's from 2013 and I bet he's still at it. Done for shoplifting in 2016 http://www.dudleynews.co.uk/news/14636454.Before_t... and two counts of crimdam and a public order offence last year http://www.dudleynews.co.uk/news/15552135.Before_t...

What a lovely, contributing member of society.

[Tankrizzo]

Roman Rhodes said:

I’d say there’s a lot more ‘class’ in the posts Resolutionary has been making - interesting and thoughtful stuff without the tedious judgmental cliches or a need to be constantly going on about his own accomplishments.

There is something tedious here, but it's more slightly odd people who feel the need to agree with any point in any thread which they consider goes against some weird perceived "NPE norm" to make themselves feel all warm and smiley, than anything else.

[anonymous-user]

Smiler. said:

Roman Rhodes said:

I’d say there’s a lot more ‘class’ in the posts Resolutionary has been making - interesting and thoughtful stuff without the tedious judgmental cliches or a need to be constantly going on about his own accomplishments.

I wonder if your view would remain the same if one of these talent-free wazzocks "improved" every one your garden fence panels.

Of course it would.

Not sure how you leap from my view that his posts are “interesting and thoughtful” to how I would or wouldn’t feel if my fence panels had been graffitied?

I don’t actually have any fence panels...

[anonymous-user]

Tankrizzo said:

Roman Rhodes said:

I’d say there’s a lot more ‘class’ in the posts Resolutionary has been making - interesting and thoughtful stuff without the tedious judgmental cliches or a need to be constantly going on about his own accomplishments.

There is something tedious here, but it's more slightly odd people who feel the need to agree with any point in any thread which they consider goes against some weird perceived "NPE norm" to make themselves feel all warm and smiley, than anything else.

What is even odder is the number of people who think they are mind-readers and know how other people “feel” and what their motivation is. Is that weirdness weirder than the “weird perceived “NPE norm””?

What is this weird perceived norm that your mind-reading talent has revealed?

[Smiler.]

Roman Rhodes said:

Smiler. said:

Roman Rhodes said:

I’d say there’s a lot more ‘class’ in the posts Resolutionary has been making - interesting and thoughtful stuff without the tedious judgmental cliches or a need to be constantly going on about his own accomplishments.

I wonder if your view would remain the same if one of these talent-free wazzocks "improved" every one your garden fence panels.

Of course it would.

Not sure how you leap from my view that his posts are “interesting and thoughtful” to how I would or wouldn’t feel if my fence panels had been graffitied?

I don’t actually have any fence panels...

Nor any imagination, it seems.

[anonymous-user]

Smiler. said:

Roman Rhodes said:

Smiler. said:

Roman Rhodes said:

I’d say there’s a lot more ‘class’ in the posts Resolutionary has been making - interesting and thoughtful stuff without the tedious judgmental cliches or a need to be constantly going on about his own accomplishments.

I wonder if your view would remain the same if one of these talent-free wazzocks "improved" every one your garden fence panels.

Of course it would.

Not sure how you leap from my view that his posts are “interesting and thoughtful” to how I would or wouldn’t feel if my fence panels had been graffitied?

I don’t actually have any fence panels...

Nor any imagination, it seems.

Imagination can be a creative and wonderful thing. I’d suggest you making things up falls into the “talent-free” category!

[Smiler.]

Roman Rhodes said:

Smiler. said:

Roman Rhodes said:

Smiler. said:

Roman Rhodes said:

I’d say there’s a lot more ‘class’ in the posts Resolutionary has been making - interesting and thoughtful stuff without the tedious judgmental cliches or a need to be constantly going on about his own accomplishments.

I wonder if your view would remain the same if one of these talent-free wazzocks "improved" every one your garden fence panels.

Of course it would.

Not sure how you leap from my view that his posts are “interesting and thoughtful” to how I would or wouldn’t feel if my fence panels had been graffitied?

I don’t actually have any fence panels...

Nor any imagination, it seems.

Imagination can be a creative and wonderful thing. I’d suggest you making things up falls into the “talent-free” category!

What have I "made up"?

[anonymous-user]

Smiler. said:

What have I "made up"?

That I wouldn’t find his posts interesting and thoughtful if my non-existent panel fence had been graffitied. Or are you going to claim you weren’t being sarcastic?

[Smiler.]

Roman Rhodes said:

Smiler. said:

What have I "made up"?

That I wouldn’t find his posts interesting and thoughtful if my non-existent panel fence had been graffitied. Or are you going to claim you weren’t being sarcastic?

Right, see, this is where the imagination bit comes in. How about your car? What if that was the object of the "artist"?

The apparent (not made up) deliberate feigning of ignorance to the point being made is something one is accustom to on PH.

I get it though.

So you would, or wouldn't mind having your property "improved" by a bit of street art?

Not making things up, it's a question.

Well two, actually.

[anonymous-user]

Smiler. said:

Roman Rhodes said:

Smiler. said:

What have I "made up"?

That I wouldn’t find his posts interesting and thoughtful if my non-existent panel fence had been graffitied. Or are you going to claim you weren’t being sarcastic?

Right, see, this is where the imagination bit comes in. How about your car? What if that was the object of the "artist"?

The apparent (not made up) deliberate feigning of ignorance to the point being made is something one is accustom to on PH.

I get it though.

So you would, or wouldn't mind having your property "improved" by a bit of street art?

Not making things up, it's a question.

Well two, actually.

But you are making things up. Why "improved" and "artist"? Your use of inverted commas indicates that you think they are not artists and that graffiti is not an improvement. That would simply be your opinion versus mine IF I had said they were artists and that graffiti was an improvement. It's a bit dim of you to assume that just because I finds someone's views, which are contrary to the lazy "scumbag vandals, they deserved it" opinion, interesting it automatically means that I support them. For you to then childishly demand that I back up support I haven't given by answering your 'whatabout' questions is ridiculous.

You say you're making a point - if so, you're not making it very well - all I'm seeing is lazy stereotyping (see overenthusiastic use of lefty, libtard, SJW, snowflake etc.)

[Smiler.]

Roman Rhodes said:

But you are making things up. Why "improved" and "artist"? Your use of inverted commas indicates that you think they are not artists and that graffiti is not an improvement. That would simply be your opinion versus mine IF I had said they were artists and that graffiti was an improvement. It's a bit dim of you to assume that just because I finds someone's views, which are contrary to the lazy "scumbag vandals, they deserved it" opinion, interesting it automatically means that I support them. For you to then childishly demand that I back up support I haven't given by answering your 'whatabout' questions is ridiculous.

You say you're making a point - if so, you're not making it very well - all I'm seeing is lazy stereotyping (see overenthusiastic use of lefty, libtard, SJW, snowflake etc.)

Erm, ok.

You do seem to get easily rattled, emotional even.

I don't think I demanded anything, but you obviously do.

As for "all I'm seeing..", yes, it is a bit of trait.


One can only assume from your posts that you have no issue with your property or anyone else's being the subject of graffiti.

Anything else is childish - your word.

It takes all sorts I guess.

[Downward]

Pothole said:

That's from 2013 and I bet he's still at it. Done for shoplifting in 2016 http://www.dudleynews.co.uk/news/14636454.Before_t... and two counts of crimdam and a public order offence last year http://www.dudleynews.co.uk/news/15552135.Before_t...

What a lovely, contributing member of society.

If i was a cynical type of person I’d suggest the media use of the words scum and vandalism will apply to this lower class chap while artist and young talent is used to describe the middle class art student who was killed.

[anonymous-user]

Smiler. said:

Roman Rhodes said:

But you are making things up. Why "improved" and "artist"? Your use of inverted commas indicates that you think they are not artists and that graffiti is not an improvement. That would simply be your opinion versus mine IF I had said they were artists and that graffiti was an improvement. It's a bit dim of you to assume that just because I finds someone's views, which are contrary to the lazy "scumbag vandals, they deserved it" opinion, interesting it automatically means that I support them. For you to then childishly demand that I back up support I haven't given by answering your 'whatabout' questions is ridiculous.

You say you're making a point - if so, you're not making it very well - all I'm seeing is lazy stereotyping (see overenthusiastic use of lefty, libtard, SJW, snowflake etc.)

Erm, ok.

You do seem to get easily rattled, emotional even.

I don't think I demanded anything, but you obviously do.

As for "all I'm seeing..", yes, it is a bit of trait.


One can only assume from your posts that you have no issue with your property or anyone else's being the subject of graffiti.

Anything else is childish - your word.

It takes all sorts I guess.

Assume away old chap! “Assumptions are quick exits for lazy minds that like to graze out in the fields without bother.”

[TriumphStag3.0V8]

Roman Rhodes said:

I’d say there’s a lot more ‘class’ in the posts Resolutionary has been making - interesting and thoughtful stuff without the tedious judgmental cliches or a need to be constantly going on about his own accomplishments.

bks is there. Utter rubbish.