Elon Musk and Pedo Cave Rescuer Claim.
Discussion
Otispunkmeyer said:
He is. Just venture into the EV forum and see his posts. They will tell you all you need to know. I just skip over his posts these days because he literally cannot have a sensible conversation when Tesla is involved.
Yeah I had a little look earlier, very strange individual - got his tongue planted so firmly up Musk's jacksie that he could eat dinner with him.Thesprucegoose said:
No offer has ever been published so to suggest it was is unfounded.
Without Prejudice offers are never published. I'll lay you 1,000 to 1 that they made a pretty good offer which was turned down in the hope of getting an excessively large sympathy award from the jury. Plan backfired.rockin said:
Without Prejudice offers are never published. I'll lay you 1,000 to 1 that they made a pretty good offer which was turned down in the hope of getting an excessively large sympathy award from the jury. Plan backfired.
You can't imply he turned down an offer when you don't know if one was offered.ReallyReallyGood said:
“It was an argument between two men” said Musks attorney. Except it wasn’t, it was in earshot of millions of people. How is it any different to putting a poster on one of those motorway billboards and in giant letters “Unsworth is a pedo”, and how is that not slander?!
Because it's libel.
Ayahuasca said:
$190m is bonkers.
$190m is only 0.8% of his net worth. So I'm not sure how they came up with that figure as it neither punishes him or really represents true lost earnings/amount of hurt for the diver due to the claim.He's probably given his 2x ex-wife Talulah more than that, twice.
hyphen said:
Jim the Sunderer said:
Is that his lawyer On the plus side, he looks like the 'no win, no fee' type!
Maybe check out his reputation.
eccles said:
hyphen said:
Jim the Sunderer said:
Is that his lawyer On the plus side, he looks like the 'no win, no fee' type!
Maybe check out his reputation.
gottans said:
Well, I don't understand or agree with the judgement especially as Unsworth will forever be known as the guy Musk called 'Pedo Guy' and the internet doesn't forget things.
Per MSN, Musk has tweeted it again, saying Sorry xxxx guy, but you really did ask for it" f
k me, he really is a manchild, isn't he? jsf said:
poo at Paul's said:
Per MSN, Musk has tweeted it again, saying Sorry xxxx guy, but you really did ask for it"
fk me, he really is a manchild, isn't he?
has he? not on his feed.f
k me, he really is a manchild, isn't he? Maybe it is ambiguity and it is referring to the first incident? I can't recall what he apparently wrote back then?
4th / 5th paragraph down, under the photo?
poo at Paul's said:
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/courts/british-cave...
Maybe it is ambiguity and it is referring to the first incident? I can't recall what he apparently wrote back then?
4th / 5th paragraph down, under the photo?
It's completely clear that article refers to the first tweet.Maybe it is ambiguity and it is referring to the first incident? I can't recall what he apparently wrote back then?
4th / 5th paragraph down, under the photo?
jsf said:
It's completely clear that article refers to the first tweet.
Uh? Is it clear? Is that what he said back then? In what context as he says you asked for it? What did Musk say to him that he is apologising for by the "sorry xxxx guy" part? Presume Musk called him another name or something first? Obviously I cannot check as it's all deleted now.
Maybe I read it that way as it is a new paragraph under the photo.
Edited by poo at Paul's on Sunday 8th December 17:28
poo at Paul's said:
Uh? Is it clear? Is that what he said back then? In what context as he says you asked for it? What did Musk say to him that he is apologising for by the "sorry xxxx guy" part? Presume Musk called him another name or something first?
Obviously I cannot check as it's all deleted now.
Jesus wept...Obviously I cannot check as it's all deleted now.
poo at Paul's said:
Not if it was a common phrase used where you grew up..!! 
The reasoning of this verdict does seem odd. Was there really some debate as to who was the subject of the comments?
That's what you should do if you want to insult someone. Insult everyone and then they wont be able to pin it down as to who you were talking about.The reasoning of this verdict does seem odd. Was there really some debate as to who was the subject of the comments?
jsf said:
poo at Paul's said:
Uh? Is it clear? Is that what he said back then? In what context as he says you asked for it? What did Musk say to him that he is apologising for by the "sorry xxxx guy" part? Presume Musk called him another name or something first?
Obviously I cannot check as it's all deleted now.
Jesus wept...Obviously I cannot check as it's all deleted now.
Oh, and the MSN link article has changed slightly since read it earlier, so it does seem clearer now.
He still seems like a manchild.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff