Jeremy Corbyn (Vol. 3)
Discussion
gizlaroc said:
SpeckledJim said:
What point is she trying to make? Genuinely perplexed by that.
I presume she is trying to say remainers are clever and Brexiters are stupid?"Listen up, stupid people. It doesn't matter what you think, because it's wrong. I'm all for democracy, of course, but you really must do as you're told."
Any Leave II campaign is just going to write itself, using this kind of thing as rocket fuel.
SpeckledJim said:
Even if she's right, she's obviously not quite clever enough to recognise that the attitude she is going out of her way to put on display is the precise reason she lost the first time round.
"Listen up, stupid people. It doesn't matter what you think, because it's wrong. I'm all for democracy, of course, but you really must do as you're told."
Any Leave II campaign is just going to write itself, using this kind of thing as rocket fuel.
More importantly, should it not be a capital G following the ! ?"Listen up, stupid people. It doesn't matter what you think, because it's wrong. I'm all for democracy, of course, but you really must do as you're told."
Any Leave II campaign is just going to write itself, using this kind of thing as rocket fuel.
gizlaroc said:
If trying to take the piss out of the "stupid" Brexiters using a sign saying how wonderful your spelling and grammar is, don't use a capital L where it is not needed and use a capital G when starting a new sentence, especially if you are spelling grammatically you thick c**t!
They really are a vanguard innovative bunch, aren't they? There might be a case for a ! after the 'Ooh' instead of a comma (as it's an exclamation). After 'correct', instead of the comma should there be either a dash or even a semi-colon? For Pete's sake, was it necessary to misspell spelled by using the term for a species of wheat? Foot, in, and shot come to mind. Talk about an inappropriate what's-it's-name! Thorodin said:
gizlaroc said:
They really are a vanguard innovative bunch, aren't they? There might be a case for a ! after the 'Ooh' instead of a comma (as it's an exclamation). After 'correct', instead of the comma should there be either a dash or even a semi-colon? For Pete's sake, was it necessary to misspell spelled by using the term for a species of wheat? Foot, in, and shot come to mind. Talk about an inappropriate what's-it's-name! She should be found, and this question put to her. What do you reckon, hauty or embarrassed response?
SpeckledJim said:
Thorodin said:
gizlaroc said:
They really are a vanguard innovative bunch, aren't they? There might be a case for a ! after the 'Ooh' instead of a comma (as it's an exclamation). After 'correct', instead of the comma should there be either a dash or even a semi-colon? For Pete's sake, was it necessary to misspell spelled by using the term for a species of wheat? Foot, in, and shot come to mind. Talk about an inappropriate what's-it's-name! She should be found, and this question put to her. What do you reckon, hauty or embarrassed response?
Thorodin said:
They really are a vanguard innovative bunch, aren't they? There might be a case for a ! after the 'Ooh' instead of a comma (as it's an exclamation). After 'correct', instead of the comma should there be either a dash or even a semi-colon? For Pete's sake, was it necessary to misspell spelled by using the term for a species of wheat? Foot, in, and shot come to mind. Talk about an inappropriate what's-it's-name!
'Spelt' is an acceptable spelling for the past tense variety of 'spell' in British English. You're not an American are you? How awful 
SpeckledJim said:
Reckon she might be an Agent of the Leave Campaign. On a mission to undermine The Remain Case for Cleverness?
She should be found, and this question put to her. What do you reckon, hauty or embarrassed response?
Certainly a shifty sideways leer at the photographer. Hooded eyes and everything. Is that a yellow jacket I can see? I imagine, I might be doing the lady (presumably) a disservice, the reply would be slightly disguised and deniably mocking, dripping in sarcasm coupled with a degree of pity for me and my forebears for our collective ignorance of the important things in life. Probably an activist in local society squabbles. That's enough, I think. Apologies for any grammatical errors or speling misteakes. She should be found, and this question put to her. What do you reckon, hauty or embarrassed response?
The corbyn thread....
If anyone wants to know why this bloke and his ideologies are a danger to UK society then please offer yourself 27mins for this video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdqEg1OUM6M
If anyone wants to know why this bloke and his ideologies are a danger to UK society then please offer yourself 27mins for this video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdqEg1OUM6M
gizlaroc said:
If trying to take the piss out of the "stupid" Brexiters using a sign saying how wonderful your spelling and grammar is, don't use a capital L where it is not needed and use a capital G when starting a new sentence, especially if you are spelling grammatically you thick c**t!
British irony at its best!Grammatically incorrect due to the lack of capitalisation. Spelling incorrect as "ooh" was incorrectly spelt, unless she meant it as "oo" as in "look" and not the more common "o" as "road". Just to confirm, I would have liked to ask her to read out what she had written.
I'll allow "spelt" as it can be either spelt or spelled.
The exclamation mark after "placards" is an inappropriate use of punctuation.
EU WE ♥ U is about as bad an example of grammar that I can think of. Grammatically correct, it would be "EU, we love you."
Nice try, love. 2/10
Thorodin said:
They really are a vanguard innovative bunch, aren't they? There might be a case for a ! after the 'Ooh' instead of a comma (as it's an exclamation). After 'correct', instead of the comma should there be either a dash or even a semi-colon? For Pete's sake, was it necessary to misspell spelled by using the term for a species of wheat? Foot, in, and shot come to mind. Talk about an inappropriate what's-it's-name!
What’s-it’s-name (sic)? Oops!
Atomic12C said:
The corbyn thread....
If anyone wants to know why this bloke and his ideologies are a danger to UK society then please offer yourself 27mins for this video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdqEg1OUM6M
Yes, definitely worth a look.If anyone wants to know why this bloke and his ideologies are a danger to UK society then please offer yourself 27mins for this video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdqEg1OUM6M
pingu393 said:
British irony at its best!
Grammatically incorrect due to the lack of capitalisation. Spelling incorrect as "ooh" was incorrectly spelt, unless she meant it as "oo" as in "look" and not the more common "o" as "road". Just to confirm, I would have liked to ask her to read out what she had written.
I'll allow "spelt" as it can be either spelt or spelled.
The exclamation mark after "placards" is an inappropriate use of punctuation.
EU WE ? U is about as bad an example of grammar that I can think of. Grammatically correct, it would be "EU, we love you."
Nice try, love. 2/10
Ha! You want irony?Grammatically incorrect due to the lack of capitalisation. Spelling incorrect as "ooh" was incorrectly spelt, unless she meant it as "oo" as in "look" and not the more common "o" as "road". Just to confirm, I would have liked to ask her to read out what she had written.
I'll allow "spelt" as it can be either spelt or spelled.
The exclamation mark after "placards" is an inappropriate use of punctuation.
EU WE ? U is about as bad an example of grammar that I can think of. Grammatically correct, it would be "EU, we love you."
Nice try, love. 2/10
How about the magistrate who’s jailed the Brexiteer who egged Corbin, calling it an ‘attack on our democratic process’?
Now, that’s ironic.........
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff