Traffic warden gets a kicking in Birmingham
Discussion
Dindoit said:
It’s interesting to see mods popping up occasionally on this thread. Not to stop colin spewing out particular brand of bile, but instead to censor those calling him what he is. That being a moronic illiterate racist troll.
Priorities are important.
Aww bless, what's happened, I've not been on here all day.Priorities are important.
Did some progressives get a bit too regressive?
colin_p said:
Au contraire, there are many and that is what gives this country, and dare I say it classical western liberal civilisation, hope.
And since when did regressive progressives have the exclusive rights on shouting. I know they like to no-platform, censor and label those who don't tow their line, via the meduim of shouting but not allowing others to do the same isn't very progressive.
Obviously no navel gazing has been done at all, so further examining the playground bully analogy;
Normal kid = The traffic warden
The playground bully = Those that kicked his head in
The sweets = Not receiving a kicking
The regressive progressivism of giving the bully the sweets = The 16 pages of ad infinitum arguement and excuses of why it is not the head kicker-in'ers fault.
Multiculturalism has failed, even the Dalai Lama has recently said so. The Dalai Lama LOL, he is obviously now off the progressives christmas card list.
How is ‘not receiving a kicking’, the sweets in your scenario?? That doesn’t even make sense.And since when did regressive progressives have the exclusive rights on shouting. I know they like to no-platform, censor and label those who don't tow their line, via the meduim of shouting but not allowing others to do the same isn't very progressive.
Obviously no navel gazing has been done at all, so further examining the playground bully analogy;
Normal kid = The traffic warden
The playground bully = Those that kicked his head in
The sweets = Not receiving a kicking
The regressive progressivism of giving the bully the sweets = The 16 pages of ad infinitum arguement and excuses of why it is not the head kicker-in'ers fault.
Multiculturalism has failed, even the Dalai Lama has recently said so. The Dalai Lama LOL, he is obviously now off the progressives christmas card list.
For your argument to make any, we would need to be campaigning for the attackers to be given his scooter, and literally nobody is doing that. Near everyone is agreeing they should prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
How can you f
k up your own analogy so badly?? 
jamoor said:
Yeah that's true.
White people were responsible for the displacement of millions of Africans from their Homelands to Northern America, debatably their descendants are still paying the price.
Luckily the kinder, gentler form of slavery practised for about 3-5x longer by the Arab world didn't create this ongoing problem. The castration and infanticide were clearly the merciful choice. You can find photos of African boys on boats, on their way for their castration, showing slavery was a large scale activity into the latter part of the 19th century. IIRC slavery was still legal in KSA until the early 1960s.White people were responsible for the displacement of millions of Africans from their Homelands to Northern America, debatably their descendants are still paying the price.
The aztec empire may have killed up to 250,000 per year in human sacrifice, the Great Leap Forward killed 40-50 million in a few years. The Bantu eliminated the San. c1 million Rwandans were killed by other Rwandans in less than 4 months
Unfortunately being a s
t to fellow humans on a huge scale is not confined to 'the white man'.andy_s said:
Just popped in to see how the traffic warden is getting on....
Mmmmm.
A few have said it is his fault he got a kicking.Mmmmm.
Disastrous said:
How is ‘not receiving a kicking’, the sweets in your scenario?? That doesn’t even make sense.
For your argument to make any, we would need to be campaigning for the attackers to be given his scooter, and literally nobody is doing that. Near everyone is agreeing they should prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
How can you fk up your own analogy so badly??
An analogy is not a scenario. Here is a scenario; a whoosh parrot lands on ones head and does a big creamy white poo.For your argument to make any, we would need to be campaigning for the attackers to be given his scooter, and literally nobody is doing that. Near everyone is agreeing they should prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
How can you f
k up your own analogy so badly?? I could conjure up another analogy involving a shark, blood in the water, Lord Haw Haw and a hand grenade but you probably wouldn't get that either.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff