Bercow resigning as Speaker

Author
Discussion

Mothersruin

8,573 posts

100 months

Saturday 28th December 2019
quotequote all
It's been reported that Bercow is not happy!

He might be grumpy, sleepy, sneezy, dopey or doc...

He's definitely not bashful.

NoNeed

15,137 posts

201 months

Saturday 28th December 2019
quotequote all
Mothersruin said:
It's been reported that Bercow is not happy!

He might be grumpy, sleepy, sneezy, dopey or doc...

He's definitely not bashful.
hehe

Thorodin

2,459 posts

134 months

Saturday 28th December 2019
quotequote all
It might be useful to consider the name of the operating protocol. The Honours.

With the redundancy of honour throughout our daily life and the acceptance of 'human frailty' being the excuse for everything from whooping cough to rape, it's not surprising that Bercow and his ilk become supreme arbiters of 'honour'.

Shouldn't such accolades be awarded only after a lifetime of unbroken public service with self-effacing modesty and admirable conduct? It doesn't just apply to Bercow though, his suggested elevation merely points to the general dive to the bottom throughout public life. No doubt it's that that contributes so much to the general disgust with which the public regard the governing classes. Beware tumbrils.

Mort7

1,487 posts

109 months

Saturday 28th December 2019
quotequote all
Couldn't happen to a nicer chap........

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 28th December 2019
quotequote all
Borghetto said:
I assume this is your attempt at humour.
Alternatively it is a fact.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 28th December 2019
quotequote all
catweasle said:
Good job too, poisonous little toad he is.
You not a fan Alf ?

I happen to think he’s something of a stunted peacock but this smacks of pettiness and gallery playing by Boris.

It’s certainly having the desired effect upon the resident NPE flapping seals smile

loafer123

15,448 posts

216 months

Saturday 28th December 2019
quotequote all

A peerage is a privilege for those who will add to society through their contribution to the second chamber and the formulation of laws. It is not a long service medal.

psi310398

9,112 posts

204 months

Saturday 28th December 2019
quotequote all
To be fair, the House of Lords is full of odious sts who have been made life peers.

However, Bercow is not especially stupid and should have understood the basic rule of thumb that if honours mattered so much to him, it might have been wise to avoid going out of his way to annoy those whose patronage was required to obtain them...Of course, rather than being an entitled and arrogant prick who thought he would still get the nod, he might have been a thoroughly principled chap who would not allow such personal favour to colour his approach to duty rofl

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 28th December 2019
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
DMN said:
Very pathetic from Johnson. But did anyone expect any better?
No - sadly all too predictable
This current New Years Honours list was created by Theresa May's government and has to go through a time consuming vetting process started months ago.

It will be next year before Boris gets to produce his list.

Bercow getting his peerage (or not) is nothing whatsoever to do with the New Years Honours list, that is granted via a different system.


Troubleatmill

10,210 posts

160 months

Saturday 28th December 2019
quotequote all
Boris just needs to say "You do a job. You get paid for it. Why should a peerage be a given?"

Our resident losers seem to be frothing that one of theirs has been besmirched.

Happy days!!!

ClaphamGT3

11,304 posts

244 months

Sunday 29th December 2019
quotequote all
jsf said:
ClaphamGT3 said:
DMN said:
Very pathetic from Johnson. But did anyone expect any better?
No - sadly all too predictable
This current New Years Honours list was created by Theresa May's government and has to go through a time consuming vetting process started months ago.

It will be next year before Boris gets to produce his list.

Bercow getting his peerage (or not) is nothing whatsoever to do with the New Years Honours list, that is granted via a different system.
As often with your posts, presented as fact but actually incorrect. It is customary for retiring speakers to have their peerage confirmed in the honours list nearest to their retirement. They do not go through the same vetting process as ordinary recipients of honours as they are already known to the Cabinet Office honours committee and do not need their credentials confirming.

You are, I suppose, at least partially correct in that a Govt can create life peers as and when it wants or needs to but, by convention, it doesn’t do so for retiring speakers

85Carrera

3,503 posts

238 months

Sunday 29th December 2019
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
jsf said:
ClaphamGT3 said:
DMN said:
Very pathetic from Johnson. But did anyone expect any better?
No - sadly all too predictable
This current New Years Honours list was created by Theresa May's government and has to go through a time consuming vetting process started months ago.

It will be next year before Boris gets to produce his list.

Bercow getting his peerage (or not) is nothing whatsoever to do with the New Years Honours list, that is granted via a different system.
As often with your posts, presented as fact but actually incorrect. It is customary for retiring speakers to have their peerage confirmed in the honours list nearest to their retirement. They do not go through the same vetting process as ordinary recipients of honours as they are already known to the Cabinet Office honours committee and do not need their credentials confirming.

You are, I suppose, at least partially correct in that a Govt can create life peers as and when it wants or needs to but, by convention, it doesn’t do so for retiring speakers
That may be so but Bercow’s behaviour, bringing the House of Commons into disrepute, does not deserve a peerage.

Denying it is the right decision despite the frothing of remainers who seem to see him as some sort of hero (whereas, hilariously, his pathetic antics were probably a large part of the reason why Boris got a good, workable majority).

williamp

19,264 posts

274 months

Sunday 29th December 2019
quotequote all
Luckily Bercrow threw away a lot of convention, so none is required when dealimg with him. Odious little st.

Agammemnon

1,628 posts

59 months

Sunday 29th December 2019
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
a Govt can create life peers as and when it wants or needs to
You say this as though we might have insufficient numbers of them. smile

Zirconia

36,010 posts

285 months

Sunday 29th December 2019
quotequote all
Troubleatmill said:
Boris just needs to say "You do a job. You get paid for it. Why should a peerage be a given?"

Our resident losers seem to be frothing that one of theirs has been besmirched.

Happy days!!!
That what he said to Nicky and Zac?

bitchstewie

51,322 posts

211 months

Sunday 29th December 2019
quotequote all
Troubleatmill said:
Boris just needs to say "You do a job. You get paid for it. Why should a peerage be a given?"

Our resident losers seem to be frothing that one of theirs has been besmirched.

Happy days!!!
Personally I couldn't careless whether Bercow gets a peerage.

With the honours system the real good news story is always the people most people haven't heard of who are recognised for what is often a lifetimes work selflessly promoting worthy causes in their communities.

Robertj21a

16,478 posts

106 months

Sunday 29th December 2019
quotequote all
85Carrera said:
That may be so but Bercow’s behaviour, bringing the House of Commons into disrepute, does not deserve a peerage.

Denying it is the right decision despite the frothing of remainers who seem to see him as some sort of hero (whereas, hilariously, his pathetic antics were probably a large part of the reason why Boris got a good, workable majority).
So very true. Bercow, Corbyn and that silly LibDem woman probably helped enormously in giving Boris such a good majority.

230TE

2,506 posts

187 months

Sunday 29th December 2019
quotequote all
It's strange that despite its pretensions to statehood the EU doesn't yet seem to have its own honours system. Otherwise Bercow could be a Grand Knight of the Order of Berlaymont or something similar. You couldn't say he hadn't worked for it.

Zirconia

36,010 posts

285 months

Sunday 29th December 2019
quotequote all
I didn't see Bercow as bringing the house into disrepute, I think the house managed that on all sides.

He played a rule that was written down, and showed the people trying to ram the process through that they were not the political giants they thought they were (otherwise they would have known it and had contingencies) and really just showed the process as a mess. If there were a legal way then May then BoJo would already have us in the land of milk and honey.

My takeaway from it is we have a group that want to bulldoze and they will miss the finer points.

Time will tell.

ClaphamGT3

11,304 posts

244 months

Sunday 29th December 2019
quotequote all
Zirconia said:
Troubleatmill said:
Boris just needs to say "You do a job. You get paid for it. Why should a peerage be a given?"

Our resident losers seem to be frothing that one of theirs has been besmirched.

Happy days!!!
That what he said to Nicky and Zac?
In Zac’s case it would be “you had a job, the electorate fired you from it but I’m giving you a peerage so that you can keep it anyway”