PC paedophile Ian Naude: Cheshire PC convicted of raping 13-
Discussion
La Liga said:
ow do you know they weren't looking at his social media during the investigations by the other two forces?
I don't. We accept the 2nd one didn't get back to Cheshire.
They knew about the first allegation. Would they have recruited him had they known about his social media?
Edited to add: just tell me where I am wrong as if I am I will hold my hands up. It doesn't need to be like a Perry Mason episode.
desolate said:
La Liga said:
ow do you know they weren't looking at his social media during the investigations by the other two forces?
I don't. We accept the 2nd one didn't get back to Cheshire.
They knew about the first allegation. Would they have recruited him had they known about his social media?
Edited to add: just tell me where I am wrong as if I am I will hold my hands up. It doesn't need to be like a Perry Mason episode.
The second and third one didn't get back to them.
It depends on what what alleged in the first allegation and whether social media was relevant to the investigation as to whether it'd be explored. Lines of enquiry for a criminal investigation have to be relevant.
Unless I have to come back and apologise I will make this my last post
So we have
2 x police investigation where he is exonerated
A third investigation (during which he is accidentally told information) finds him guilty and uncovers a long trail of social media based grooming.
Yet we are expected to believe it's a simple error in the recruitment process caused by an unfortunate issue of timing and that everything else is tickety boo.
Is that more or less it?
So we have
2 x police investigation where he is exonerated
A third investigation (during which he is accidentally told information) finds him guilty and uncovers a long trail of social media based grooming.
Yet we are expected to believe it's a simple error in the recruitment process caused by an unfortunate issue of timing and that everything else is tickety boo.
Is that more or less it?
desolate said:
Unless I have to come back and apologise I will make this my last post
So we have
2 x police investigation where he is exonerated
A third investigation (during which he is accidentally told information) finds him guilty and uncovers a long trail of social media based grooming.
Yet we are expected to believe it's a simple error in the recruitment process caused by an unfortunate issue of timing.
Is that more or less it?
No, you have one where he was exonerated. So we have
2 x police investigation where he is exonerated
A third investigation (during which he is accidentally told information) finds him guilty and uncovers a long trail of social media based grooming.
Yet we are expected to believe it's a simple error in the recruitment process caused by an unfortunate issue of timing.
Is that more or less it?
You then have two further ones (which I assume form part of his convictions). These are the ones which were not detected between his vetting and starting.
A forth is the rape of the 13 year old.
There are five complainants in total so either further complainants came forward, or further ones were identified and approached when he was being investigated.
I reckon a 20 year or late teen sentence, but I am just making an 'educated guess'. I've not looked at the guidelines etc.
La Liga said:
o, you have one where he was exonerated.
You then have two further ones (which I assume form part of his convictions). These are the ones which were not detected between his vetting and starting.
A forth is the rape of the 13 year old.
There are five complainants in total so either further complainants came forward, or further ones were identified and approached when he was being investigated.
I reckon a 20 year or late teen sentence, but I am just making an 'educated guess'. I've not looked at the guidelines etc.
I am boring myself now so I really will leave it.You then have two further ones (which I assume form part of his convictions). These are the ones which were not detected between his vetting and starting.
A forth is the rape of the 13 year old.
There are five complainants in total so either further complainants came forward, or further ones were identified and approached when he was being investigated.
I reckon a 20 year or late teen sentence, but I am just making an 'educated guess'. I've not looked at the guidelines etc.
We shall not be seeing Mr Naude for sometime.
Sentenced to 25 years: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-4...
Sentenced to 25 years: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-4...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff