98 yr old duke crashes range rover

98 yr old duke crashes range rover

Author
Discussion

Laurel Green

30,779 posts

232 months

Thursday 14th February 2019
quotequote all
Retired.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 14th February 2019
quotequote all
Cold said:
Civil Servant.
Wrong on both counts rofl

HOGEPH

5,249 posts

186 months

Friday 15th February 2019
quotequote all
yonex said:
Just to hear what he’d say when the court asked ‘occupation’

smile

ClaphamGT3

11,300 posts

243 months

Friday 15th February 2019
quotequote all
yonex said:
Just to hear what he’d say when the court asked ‘occupation’

smile
Prince of the United Kingdom and retired naval officer is the correct answer

If he fancied a bit of sport he could throw in Lord High Admiral

Edited by ClaphamGT3 on Friday 15th February 15:42

rscott

14,758 posts

191 months

Friday 15th February 2019
quotequote all
ElectricSoup said:
jamei303 said:
ElectricSoup said:
That's cool, so long as we're all allowed to choose our own punishment to avoid prosecution. Excellent idea.
No one mentioned choosing your own punishment, but I'm sure if you're ever pulled for doing 80 on a motorway and the cop gives you a few words of advice and sends you on your way, you will no doubt refuse and insist on a full court hearing.
You cannot equate moderate speeding with driving without due care and attention. The driver in question here hit another vehicle and endangered three people's lives. I very much doubt I, or you, would be given the opportunity to avoid prosecution in this specific set of circumstances.
How about nearly hitting someone on a pedestrian crossing? The driver surrendered her licence and avoided prosecution .

https://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/15704469.pensi...

henrycrun

2,449 posts

240 months

Friday 15th February 2019
quotequote all
I was told there was an interesting piece in the Telegraph. (Shame about the paywall)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2019/02/1...

Edited by henrycrun on Friday 15th February 22:50

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 15th February 2019
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
Prince of the United Kingdom and retired naval officer is the correct answer

If he fancied a bit of sport he could throw in Lord High Admiral

Edited by anonymous-user on Friday 15th February 15:42
All incorrect. His job is 'Queens chief lackey and corgi counter'



Vipers

32,886 posts

228 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
rambo19 said:
TBH, I cannot see what the problem is.
Happens everyday with old duffers having crashes and giving up driving.
Same thing happened to my grandad.
Happens every day with young duffers as well, you don't need to be old to be stupid. As demonstrated by JCB driver who turned 90 degrees last week from lane 1 to 2 which I was in cruising at 70, so he could drive through a gap in the barrier on the dual carriageway onto the other side.

Had I been driving much faster and not paying as much attention as I was, I may not be here pounding the keys.

Bad driving affects all age groups.

OldGermanHeaps

3,832 posts

178 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
it does seem standard, an 80+year old plowed into the back of my car stopped at a set of red lights in a 30 hard enough to write off my car and the car in front and damage 2 further cars in front.
My mate who was in the car suffered a broken neck and was off work over a year and had no job to go back to because he was off so long.
the old guy who was shouting asking why I stopped in the middle of the road promised to surrender his licence so nfa. When I saw him behind the wheel a month later I reported it to the officer who told me NFA I was told he considered the matter closed and wouldn't be following it up. Great reinforcement of a belief to an 18 year old who was getting pulled regularly for the crime of being young in a hot hatch. Even when absolutely positively doing nothing wrong whatsoever at all everything fully legal, slow quiet, sensible, blue lights, is this your car, where are you going, why are you out at this time of night, whats in the boot? dont let me catch you round here again etc.

andy118run

Original Poster:

872 posts

206 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/crime/emma-fairweathe...

"Woman hurt in crash with Prince Philip could lose licence"


I'll just leave this amusing little update here for your perusal.


Of course, it probably won't happen/makes a good headline etc etc.

But I know Ms Fairweather didn't receive a great deal of sympathy for her whining appearances on Tv and tales to the papers, so I find it an amusing little aside.

Rewe

1,016 posts

92 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
andy118run said:
But I know Ms Fairweather didn't receive a great deal of sympathy for her whining appearances on Tv and tales to the papers
As opposed to the driver who despite also being quite badly hurt, having had her car written off and all this with her baby on board has neither asked for nor received any special treatment and continues to keep dignified silence.

talksthetorque

10,815 posts

135 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
Rewe said:
andy118run said:
But I know Ms Fairweather didn't receive a great deal of sympathy for her whining appearances on Tv and tales to the papers
As opposed to the driver who despite also being quite badly hurt, having had her car written off and all this with her baby on board has neither asked for nor received any special treatment and continues to keep dignified silence.
https://vimeo.com/324210585

?

Sheepshanks

32,769 posts

119 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
andy118run said:
https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/crime/emma-fairweathe...

"Woman hurt in crash with Prince Philip could lose licence"
It it's the same original offence she surely can't get points for both occasions of failing to identify, can she? That would be bonkers.

Rewe

1,016 posts

92 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
talksthetorque said:
You would have thought so, but no.

douglasb

299 posts

222 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
The dates look like it was two separate incidents. While she has probably contributed to why she now has two "failing to furnish" notices by not updating her Golf's V5C, if she only became aware of these charges in the last 21 days she should do statutory declarations to say that this is the first that she is aware of the charges. These two charges are then "reset" to the original speeding charges (or red light, or whatever else they may be) and she can plead to them.

Depending on what the original charges were (speed v limit, dangerous driving, etc.) the new result could be £200 and 6 points or a whole lot more.

Mort7

1,487 posts

108 months

No ideas for a name

2,188 posts

86 months

Wednesday 29th May 2019
quotequote all
Mort7 said:
A special kind of stupid?

The Mirror said:
A court official said Ms Fairweather entered guilty pleas to the four offences in writing
Why plead guilty to the FOUR offences - pleading guilty to the FtF would be enough - by definition, they have no information as to who the driver was.
A sensible person might offer to plead guilty for the two speeding offences if they were to drop the two FtF.


Randy Winkman

16,136 posts

189 months

Wednesday 29th May 2019
quotequote all
Karma? I think she helped do us all a favour.

227bhp

10,203 posts

128 months

Wednesday 29th May 2019
quotequote all
I don't think this is really newsworthy.

Randy Winkman

16,136 posts

189 months

Wednesday 29th May 2019
quotequote all
227bhp said:
I don't think this is really newsworthy.
It's got 2 threads on PH. scratchchin