How do we think EU negotiations will go? (Vol 8)

How do we think EU negotiations will go? (Vol 8)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
Troubleatmill said:
Good post!

To save you the bother wink
laugh

alfie2244

11,292 posts

189 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
jsf said:
Troubleatmill said:
Good post!

To save you the bother wink
laugh
laugh

steve_k

579 posts

206 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
mx5nut said:
Brexit latest: Aviva and Natwest rush to get their money out of the country. Brexiters scramble to find a way to blame diesel sales.
How much of Aviva's £350bn of assets have they moved ?

barryrs

4,392 posts

224 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
steve_k said:
How much of Aviva's £350bn of assets have they moved ?
I thought I read none; but are planning £9billion at around 11:50pm on the 28th if no deal agreed.

wisbech

2,980 posts

122 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
Greg66 said:
Willy Nilly said:
Has there ever been anything in British politics that has been so divisive?
Catholicism and the Protestant Reformation: more divisive (and violent).
Home Rule for Ireland- split the Liberal party, and not granting it led to wars (Irish war of independence then the Irish civil war)



B'stard Child

28,447 posts

247 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
alfie2244 said:
jsf said:
Troubleatmill said:
Good post!

To save you the bother wink
laugh
laugh
I had to think about it but rofl

Sway

26,324 posts

195 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
Elysium said:
Sway said:
Elysium said:
SunsetZed said:
Helicopter123 said:
Amateurish said:
A50 cannot be unilaterally postponed, only with the unanimous agreement of all other EU states.
Which of course is a formality.
Care to explain why you think that? And whether any clauses would come with it?
I suspect the EU already have an in principal agreement from the member states to extend the article 50 deadline.

No-deal is not in their interest and it's already apparent that there is not enough time to get a deal into legislation:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1080475/Brexit-n...

I can't imagine there will be any conditions (other than a new timescale) as we would never agree to them.

I am pretty sure we only have to ask.
Then what happens in EU Parliament elections?

Do we stand candidates and send MEPs? If not, why as we'd still be members.

If we do, what happens with their ability to vote for things relating to after we'd have "theoretically" left? Do they get excluded, even though it's just as possible that the UK would still be members once the precedents of extensions has been demonstrated?

How about the then likelihood that any agreed transition period would roll into the next EU budgetary cycle? That completely changes the game for the "€39Bn"...

It really isn't straightforward nor without consequence (perhaps unintended) to extend. The timetable is what it is for very good reason - it's the maximum duration possible whilst avoiding these things.
Mar 29th is just the end of an arbitrary longstop that is written into article 50. It is no more cleverly considered than that.

I think we can extend until May with the euro elections being an issue. The divorce payment is also a red herring. We have been paying throughout the notice period and will continue to do so till we finally leave.
I'm not sure it's as simple as you make out - or indeed that your recollection of events matches mine.

I recall very clearly immense pressure from the EU to submit Art. 50 notice.

Agree that extension to May is likely not much issue for the EU. However, it adds more uncertainty - and what does another few weeks really matter?

On the payments and budget I completely disagree. Everything, from our continuing current payments, to the "divorce payment" are rooted in maintaining our funding for spending that was part of the multi year budgetary cycle we were fully part of defining (plus some for liabilities generated by our own representatives such as pensions).

That's why the "transition" wasn't two years. It was until the end of the budgetary cycle. Extend - and we'll be on the hook for spending commitments we will not be party to deciding.

Everything from the "membership fee" calculation, to levels of spending on EU projects, to percentages of VAT and Import Tariffs passed over - all are part of a specific cycle. That's handing a blank cheque to the EU - and do you really think they'd be stupid enough not to take advantage of it?

That is electoral suicide - and opens up even more potential for a reactionary and pissed off electorate to do stupid things if a charismatic leader comes along to offer "an alternative".

powerstroke

10,283 posts

161 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
mx5nut said:
Brexit latest: Aviva and Natwest rush to get their money out of the country. Brexiters scramble to find a way to blame diesel sales.
Will you and your mates still get your monthly cheque from George if its a no deal on the 29th ????

Amateurish

7,755 posts

223 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
Helicopter123 said:
Amateurish said:
A50 cannot be unilaterally postponed, only with the unanimous agreement of all other EU states.
Which of course is a formality.
It is the opposite of a formality.

Triggering article 50 is a formality.

Getting all the other member states to agree to an extension and changing UK legislation to amend the withdrawal act is not a formality.

Elysium

13,851 posts

188 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
Sway said:
Elysium said:
Sway said:
Elysium said:
SunsetZed said:
Helicopter123 said:
Amateurish said:
A50 cannot be unilaterally postponed, only with the unanimous agreement of all other EU states.
Which of course is a formality.
Care to explain why you think that? And whether any clauses would come with it?
I suspect the EU already have an in principal agreement from the member states to extend the article 50 deadline.

No-deal is not in their interest and it's already apparent that there is not enough time to get a deal into legislation:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1080475/Brexit-n...

I can't imagine there will be any conditions (other than a new timescale) as we would never agree to them.

I am pretty sure we only have to ask.
Then what happens in EU Parliament elections?

Do we stand candidates and send MEPs? If not, why as we'd still be members.

If we do, what happens with their ability to vote for things relating to after we'd have "theoretically" left? Do they get excluded, even though it's just as possible that the UK would still be members once the precedents of extensions has been demonstrated?

How about the then likelihood that any agreed transition period would roll into the next EU budgetary cycle? That completely changes the game for the "€39Bn"...

It really isn't straightforward nor without consequence (perhaps unintended) to extend. The timetable is what it is for very good reason - it's the maximum duration possible whilst avoiding these things.
Mar 29th is just the end of an arbitrary longstop that is written into article 50. It is no more cleverly considered than that.

I think we can extend until May with the euro elections being an issue. The divorce payment is also a red herring. We have been paying throughout the notice period and will continue to do so till we finally leave.
I'm not sure it's as simple as you make out - or indeed that your recollection of events matches mine.

I recall very clearly immense pressure from the EU to submit Art. 50 notice.

Agree that extension to May is likely not much issue for the EU. However, it adds more uncertainty - and what does another few weeks really matter?

On the payments and budget I completely disagree. Everything, from our continuing current payments, to the "divorce payment" are rooted in maintaining our funding for spending that was part of the multi year budgetary cycle we were fully part of defining (plus some for liabilities generated by our own representatives such as pensions).

That's why the "transition" wasn't two years. It was until the end of the budgetary cycle. Extend - and we'll be on the hook for spending commitments we will not be party to deciding.

Everything from the "membership fee" calculation, to levels of spending on EU projects, to percentages of VAT and Import Tariffs passed over - all are part of a specific cycle. That's handing a blank cheque to the EU - and do you really think they'd be stupid enough not to take advantage of it?

That is electoral suicide - and opens up even more potential for a reactionary and pissed off electorate to do stupid things if a charismatic leader comes along to offer "an alternative".
This is not the ‘transition’ period. That starts after we leave and it’s largely what the €39bn is for.

If we delay leaving the transition period could just shorten so it still ends on the 31st Dec 2020

Sway

26,324 posts

195 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
Elysium said:
This is not the ‘transition’ period. That starts after we leave and it’s largely what the €39bn is for.

If we delay leaving the transition period could just shorten so it still ends on the 31st Dec 2020
I'm well aware we're not in any transition period now. We're full members still, with full representation in Parliament.

Increasing the period of uncertainty, whilst reducing the period available for implementation of unicorns at the border doesn't sound like a prudent approach.

tescorank

1,997 posts

232 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
Oh no it couldn't get any worse Albert Steptoe to ask for forgiveness and be the white knight

https://news.sky.com/story/jeremy-corbyn-heads-to-...

Tuna

19,930 posts

285 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
tescorank said:
Oh no it couldn't get any worse Albert Steptoe to ask for forgiveness and be the white knight

https://news.sky.com/story/jeremy-corbyn-heads-to-...
The link itself implies a completely different headline. rofl

mx5nut

5,404 posts

83 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
Fitch puts UK credit rating on negative watch - Growing likelihood of a no-deal Brexit prompts unscheduled update

Brextremists continue to make us look strong on the world stage and demonstrate all those cards we hold ready for trade negotiations with the EU and ROW.

bitchstewie

51,395 posts

211 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
mx5nut said:
Fitch puts UK credit rating on negative watch - Growing likelihood of a no-deal Brexit prompts unscheduled update

Brextremists continue to make us look strong on the world stage and demonstrate all those cards we hold ready for trade negotiations with the EU and ROW.
What do Fitch know? They'll be sorry too.

Borghetto

3,274 posts

184 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
mx5nut said:
Fitch puts UK credit rating on negative watch - Growing likelihood of a no-deal Brexit prompts unscheduled update

Brextremists continue to make us look strong on the world stage and demonstrate all those cards we hold ready for trade negotiations with the EU and ROW.
The currency markets look pannicked and the pound has plumeted to Euro 1.15, I guess with the further bad news predicted by some on this thread, it might decrease further - perhaps 1.16.

SunsetZed

2,257 posts

171 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
Elysium said:
Sway said:
Elysium said:
SunsetZed said:
Helicopter123 said:
Amateurish said:
A50 cannot be unilaterally postponed, only with the unanimous agreement of all other EU states.
Which of course is a formality.
Care to explain why you think that? And whether any clauses would come with it?
I suspect the EU already have an in principal agreement from the member states to extend the article 50 deadline.

No-deal is not in their interest and it's already apparent that there is not enough time to get a deal into legislation:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1080475/Brexit-n...

I can't imagine there will be any conditions (other than a new timescale) as we would never agree to them.

I am pretty sure we only have to ask.
Then what happens in EU Parliament elections?

Do we stand candidates and send MEPs? If not, why as we'd still be members.

If we do, what happens with their ability to vote for things relating to after we'd have "theoretically" left? Do they get excluded, even though it's just as possible that the UK would still be members once the precedents of extensions has been demonstrated?

How about the then likelihood that any agreed transition period would roll into the next EU budgetary cycle? That completely changes the game for the "€39Bn"...

It really isn't straightforward nor without consequence (perhaps unintended) to extend. The timetable is what it is for very good reason - it's the maximum duration possible whilst avoiding these things.
Mar 29th is just the end of an arbitrary longstop that is written into article 50. It is no more cleverly considered than that.

I think we can extend until May with the euro elections being an issue. The divorce payment is also a red herring. We have been paying throughout the notice period and will continue to do so till we finally leave.
Understood on the extension but 2 months is quite short, all I've heard from the EU is that we're done with the WA and we don't have time to change it. That said I do agree that it would avoid the elections issues.

In terms of clauses that could come with an extension do you think there would be any? Also, hypothetically let's assume that the extension until late May is granted and we're in the same position 2 months from now, do you still think an extension would be a formality?

slow_poke

1,855 posts

235 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
mx5nut said:
Fitch puts UK credit rating on negative watch - Growing likelihood of a no-deal Brexit prompts unscheduled update

Brextremists continue to make us look strong on the world stage and demonstrate all those cards we hold ready for trade negotiations with the EU and ROW.
What do Fitch know? They'll be sorry too.
Well, they are experts. I'd expect them to know what they're talking about.

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

254 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
Borghetto said:
mx5nut said:
Fitch puts UK credit rating on negative watch - Growing likelihood of a no-deal Brexit prompts unscheduled update

Brextremists continue to make us look strong on the world stage and demonstrate all those cards we hold ready for trade negotiations with the EU and ROW.
The currency markets look pannicked and the pound has plumeted to Euro 1.15, I guess with the further bad news predicted by some on this thread, it might decrease further - perhaps 1.16.
1.16!?

Hold the line. Stay with me. If you find yourself alone, riding in green fields with the sun on your face, do not be troubled; for you are in Elysium, and you're already dead!

Camoradi

4,294 posts

257 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
tescorank said:
Oh no it couldn't get any worse Albert Steptoe to ask for forgiveness and be the white knight

https://news.sky.com/story/jeremy-corbyn-heads-to-...
If Poundland did International Trade Negotiations.........
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED