How do we think EU negotiations will go? (Vol 10)

[chrispmartha]

Troubleatmill said:

Did Budgie ever post back with the last 3 digits of the phone number?

Even if he had what would it have proved?

It was a nonsense request.

[Piha]

Garvin said:

Squiddly Diddly said:

FiF said:

Thread gone full Groundhog day.

Just shows how some people are entrenched in their views and it doesn't matter how many times it is pointed out they are wrong, they still keep posting their nonsense.

Exactly. There is one poster here who keeps asking how May’s deal is not leaving the EU but despite being told many times persists with their nonsense and continually advertising their lack of basic comprehension.

[crankedup]

PF62 said:

crankedup said:

The appetite for a ‘no deal’ brexit is growing amongst the electorate

If that is true, it must must mean that they did not vote for a 'no deal' Brexit in the referendum but voted for a 'deal' Brexit.

Surely delivering a 'no deal' Breixt is 'going against the will of the people' at the time they voted, and it would be utterly unconstitutional to deliver something other than they demonstrated they wanted in the referendum.

Perhaps if these Brexiteers have changed their mind on what they want, then we ought to hold another referendum to validate their new views.

Leave means leave, brexit means brexit.
It’s been debated for 30 months and was clear when leavers were held to have claimed a clear winning majority in the referendum.
A second referendum has been ruled out by the HoC.

[Squiddly Diddly]

don'tbesilly said:

Brexit is still causing PM sleepless nights, not something he experienced back in 2016.

Wrong, as always.

[Piha]

crankedup said:

Leave means leave, brexit means brexit.
It’s been debated for 30 months and was clear when leavers were held to have claimed a clear winning majority in the referendum.
A second referendum has been ruled out by the HoC.

And yet the ERG voted against leaving....!!!!!!



Until some of them changed their minds.....?????

[gooner1]

chrispmartha said:

Troubleatmill said:

Did Budgie ever post back with the last 3 digits of the phone number?

Even if he had what would it have proved?

It was a nonsense request.

You consider Budgie's claim to be legit?

[Squiddly Diddly]

Garvin said:

Exactly. There is one poster here who keeps asking how May’s deal is not leaving the EU but despite being told many times persists with their nonsense and continually advertising their lack of basic comprehension.

Will the UK be a member state under May's deal?

How many MEP's will the UK have under May's deal?

Will the UK be in the CU/SM under May's deal?

Will the UK be subject to FoM under May's deal?

Answers on a ballot paper.

[crankedup]

Troubleatmill said:

Did Budgie ever post back with the last 3 digits of the phone number?

I still find it amusing that budgie disappears and mx makes a sudden appearance within hours of budgies departure.Couple of other posters pull the same lamentable trick.

[wiggy001]

Squiddly Diddly said:

Will the UK be a member state under May's deal? no

How many MEP's will the UK have under May's deal? 0

Will the UK be in the CU/SM under May's deal? yes

Will the UK be subject to FoM under May's deal? yes

Answers on a ballot paper.

hth

[Disastrous]

B'stard Child said:

Because we won't be leaving or because you are worried about it either way anymore?

The former. Or if we do, it’ll be a BRINO sop to keep the little Engländers quiet, which I’m ok with.

[Squiddly Diddly]

wiggy001 said:

hth

Wrong, try again.

[alfie2244]

crankedup said:

Troubleatmill said:

Did Budgie ever post back with the last 3 digits of the phone number?

I still find it amusing that budgie disappears and mx makes a sudden appearance within hours of budgies departure.Couple of other posters pull the same lamentable trick.

Funny that

[Piha]

crankedup said:

I still find it amusing that budgie disappears and mx makes a sudden appearance within hours of budgies departure.Couple of other posters pull the same lamentable trick.

Serious question - I notice that some posters accuse posters with opposing views of being somebody else or being a previously banned poster. What is the fascination with this and why do certain posters insist in repeatedly doing this time and time again?

[Digga]

Piha said:

crankedup said:

I still find it amusing that budgie disappears and mx makes a sudden appearance within hours of budgies departure.Couple of other posters pull the same lamentable trick.

Serious question - I notice that some posters accuse posters with opposing views of being somebody else or being a previously banned poster. What is the fascination with this and why do certain posters insist in repeatedly doing this time and time again?

Dave?

Is that you?

[Piha]

Digga said:

Piha said:

crankedup said:

I still find it amusing that budgie disappears and mx makes a sudden appearance within hours of budgies departure.Couple of other posters pull the same lamentable trick.

Serious question - I notice that some posters accuse posters with opposing views of being somebody else or being a previously banned poster. What is the fascination with this and why do certain posters insist in repeatedly doing this time and time again?

Dave?

Is that you?

• waves at Sarah*

[paulrockliffe]

Squiddly Diddly said:

wiggy001 said:

hth

Wrong, try again.

It's only wrong in that those things come about as a result of the future relationship that the WA mandates rather than directly from the WA.

[Squiddly Diddly]

paulrockliffe said:

It's only wrong in that those things come about as a result of the future relationship that the WA mandates rather than directly from the WA.

Still wrong, try again.

[Toaster]

Just a thought here to all those that think that the Irish backstop is something that can be disregarded

"Pelosi warns there will be no U.S.-U.K. trade deal if Brexit harms the Irish peace accord" https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/pelosi-warns-...

So much for "the easiest deal in the world" and the notion that we can write our own rules and sod everyone else

[Robertj21a]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

No Deal has been the most likely outcome for a very long time. It's only more recently that others are coming to realise that it will probably happen.

[Piha]

Toaster said:

Just a thought here to all those that think that the Irish backstop is something that can be disregarded

"Pelosi warns there will be no U.S.-U.K. trade deal if Brexit harms the Irish peace accord" https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/pelosi-warns-...

So much for "the easiest deal in the world" and the notion that we can write our own rules and sod everyone else

Well durrr.....

Everybody knows that the US needs the UK more than anything else in the entire world.......