Man jailed for sexual activity with fake 19 year old
Discussion
amusingduck said:
Frank7 said:
El stovey said:
Frank7 said:
irocfan said:
let's be honest here Frank7 - there's a certain subset on here including one particular throbber who will try and twist everything to their own viewpoint. The best thing to do is ignore them - without the oxygen of responding the f
ktards will, hopefully, disappear
I accept that you make a valid point irocfan, but it’s extremely difficult to sit on your hands and shut up in the face of unwarranted and undeserved innuendo.ktards will, hopefully, disappearhttps://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
All I said was that the average Joe in the street, hearing that a guy was banging that many women, would initially react with “lucky s.o.b.”
They might give it some thought, then say, well actually it’s just as bad as making women prostitute themselves, but the average heterosexual man’s initial reaction would be, “oh man.”
Gotta start thinking before posting in future.
You started the thread and repeatedly downplayed what happened to the bloke. If "All I said was that the average Joe in the street, hearing that a guy was banging that many women, would initially react with “lucky s.o.b.”" were true, you wouldn't have received the lashback you did.
techiedave said:
As I said then the baiting that Frank got was OTT and in some instances was little more than bullying.
Some posters are so pathetically invested in dictating to others they cannot see the problems they present
And as I said, if he had posted the same thing about women forced into the sex trade you would not be posting this. He wouldn't have either.Some posters are so pathetically invested in dictating to others they cannot see the problems they present
Ed. said:
I would agree with this and be interested in what Frank or Dave feel is inaccurate.
I didn’t downplay what allegedly happened to the guy in the news report, “being forced to have sex with 3 or 4 women per day”, at least I wasn’t trying to, and I don’t think that I did.Of course, the paragons of virtue on here, will all be desperately trying to recall my OP now, in order to ‘cherry pick’ phrases that make it appear that I WAS downplaying what happened.
I was merely trying to say that the initial reaction of the average Joe, on hearing, or reading of that news item, would be, “how lucky can one guy be?”
I wasn’t saying that that reaction would be a good one, just that it would BE the reaction.
I also believed that the average Joe reading my post would see that that was ALL that I was saying, NOT that it was something I approved of.
Dave appeared to get that, but for whatever reason, other ostensibly intelligent posters who probably ‘got it’ too, had their own agendas, and began to shovel the opprobrium.
Frank7 said:
I didn’t downplay what allegedly happened to the guy in the news report, “being forced to have sex with 3 or 4 women per day”, at least I wasn’t trying to, and I don’t think that I did.
Of course, the paragons of virtue on here, will all be desperately trying to recall my OP now, in order to ‘cherry pick’ phrases that make it appear that I WAS downplaying what happened.
I was merely trying to say that the initial reaction of the average Joe, on hearing, or reading of that news item, would be, “how lucky can one guy be?”
I wasn’t saying that that reaction would be a good one, just that it would BE the reaction.
I also believed that the average Joe reading my post would see that that was ALL that I was saying, NOT that it was something I approved of.
Dave appeared to get that, but for whatever reason, other ostensibly intelligent posters who probably ‘got it’ too, had their own agendas, and began to shovel the opprobrium.
What I find really pathetic is that the thread gets removed for presumably being unsuitable. Fair enough I can only recall it to a certain point. Quite probably after that point some unsuitable baiting and name calling occurred.Of course, the paragons of virtue on here, will all be desperately trying to recall my OP now, in order to ‘cherry pick’ phrases that make it appear that I WAS downplaying what happened.
I was merely trying to say that the initial reaction of the average Joe, on hearing, or reading of that news item, would be, “how lucky can one guy be?”
I wasn’t saying that that reaction would be a good one, just that it would BE the reaction.
I also believed that the average Joe reading my post would see that that was ALL that I was saying, NOT that it was something I approved of.
Dave appeared to get that, but for whatever reason, other ostensibly intelligent posters who probably ‘got it’ too, had their own agendas, and began to shovel the opprobrium.
However we have another poster (whom Frank has encountered elsewhere ) openly referring to other posters as paedophiles and fascists.
And trolling from thread to thread without any form of moderation being applied to him/her in any way
Delightful.
Frank7 said:
I didn’t downplay what allegedly happened to the guy in the news report, “being forced to have sex with 3 or 4 women per day”, at least I wasn’t trying to, and I don’t think that I did.
Of course, the paragons of virtue on here, will all be desperately trying to recall my OP now, in order to ‘cherry pick’ phrases that make it appear that I WAS downplaying what happened.
I was merely trying to say that the initial reaction of the average Joe, on hearing, or reading of that news item, would be, “how lucky can one guy be?”
I wasn’t saying that that reaction would be a good one, just that it would BE the reaction.
I also believed that the average Joe reading my post would see that that was ALL that I was saying, NOT that it was something I approved of.
Dave appeared to get that, but for whatever reason, other ostensibly intelligent posters who probably ‘got it’ too, had their own agendas, and began to shovel the opprobrium.
It was meant as a joke, basic pub banter (hate that word) you'd hear between a few men, anyone with half a working brain knew it, the problem is there's a lot more stupid c*nts around now and each one has to shout something louder and more idiotic than the last. 2019 and you can't say SFA or you insult some poor fragile halfwit.Of course, the paragons of virtue on here, will all be desperately trying to recall my OP now, in order to ‘cherry pick’ phrases that make it appear that I WAS downplaying what happened.
I was merely trying to say that the initial reaction of the average Joe, on hearing, or reading of that news item, would be, “how lucky can one guy be?”
I wasn’t saying that that reaction would be a good one, just that it would BE the reaction.
I also believed that the average Joe reading my post would see that that was ALL that I was saying, NOT that it was something I approved of.
Dave appeared to get that, but for whatever reason, other ostensibly intelligent posters who probably ‘got it’ too, had their own agendas, and began to shovel the opprobrium.
techiedave said:
Frank7 said:
I didn’t downplay what allegedly happened to the guy in the news report, “being forced to have sex with 3 or 4 women per day”, at least I wasn’t trying to, and I don’t think that I did.
Of course, the paragons of virtue on here, will all be desperately trying to recall my OP now, in order to ‘cherry pick’ phrases that make it appear that I WAS downplaying what happened.
I was merely trying to say that the initial reaction of the average Joe, on hearing, or reading of that news item, would be, “how lucky can one guy be?”
I wasn’t saying that that reaction would be a good one, just that it would BE the reaction.
I also believed that the average Joe reading my post would see that that was ALL that I was saying, NOT that it was something I approved of.
Dave appeared to get that, but for whatever reason, other ostensibly intelligent posters who probably ‘got it’ too, had their own agendas, and began to shovel the opprobrium.
What I find really pathetic is that the thread gets removed for presumably being unsuitable. Fair enough I can only recall it to a certain point. Quite probably after that point some unsuitable baiting and name calling occurred.Of course, the paragons of virtue on here, will all be desperately trying to recall my OP now, in order to ‘cherry pick’ phrases that make it appear that I WAS downplaying what happened.
I was merely trying to say that the initial reaction of the average Joe, on hearing, or reading of that news item, would be, “how lucky can one guy be?”
I wasn’t saying that that reaction would be a good one, just that it would BE the reaction.
I also believed that the average Joe reading my post would see that that was ALL that I was saying, NOT that it was something I approved of.
Dave appeared to get that, but for whatever reason, other ostensibly intelligent posters who probably ‘got it’ too, had their own agendas, and began to shovel the opprobrium.
However we have another poster (whom Frank has encountered elsewhere ) openly referring to other posters as paedophiles and fascists.
And trolling from thread to thread without any form of moderation being applied to him/her in any way
Delightful.
Don’t always agree with Frank’s posts, however he’s always seemed polite and open in what he types. Only thing he is guilty of is not having a legal professional proof-read his posts to prevent other posters twisting his words in some bizarre form of self-gratification.
techiedave said:
What I find really pathetic is that the thread gets removed for presumably being unsuitable. Fair enough I can only recall it to a certain point. Quite probably after that point some unsuitable baiting and name calling occurred.
However we have another poster (whom Frank has encountered elsewhere ) openly referring to other posters as paedophiles and fascists.
And trolling from thread to thread without any form of moderation being applied to him/her in any way
Delightful.
indeed - said twunt has actually been reported and yet....However we have another poster (whom Frank has encountered elsewhere ) openly referring to other posters as paedophiles and fascists.
And trolling from thread to thread without any form of moderation being applied to him/her in any way
Delightful.
Thanks to everyone who took the time to attest that they felt that I wasn’t the bad guy in all this, but in future, if I can’t couch a post in words that makes it 100% obvious that I’m the guy in the white hat, a slam dunk goodie, I’ll put my keyboard out of sight.
Now, who can I argue with on a Brexit thread?
Now, who can I argue with on a Brexit thread?
irocfan said:
Frank7 said:
Now, who can I argue with on a Brexit thread?
that'd be me, total opposite view to you - remainer scum 
Allow me to introduce you to Red, my Leaver wife.
Say bonjour quick, I’m about to banish her.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff