Nigel Farage Launches New Brexit Party.

[Down and out]

techiedave said:

A bit of a mixed bag recently
The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.

I reckon you've swung a couple more to TBP posting that leaflet as I doubt everyone got one.

[alfie2244]

Hoink said:

My mate struggled with the literature but luckily there is an arrow telling him where to stick his cross on the ballot paper.

Like this?

[Vanden Saab]

alfie2244 said:

Hoink said:

My mate struggled with the literature but luckily there is an arrow telling him where to stick his cross on the ballot paper.

Like this?

bonus for the pen...

[Otis Criblecoblis]

techiedave said:

A bit of a mixed bag recently
The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.

The lengths you have to go to do a long-winded ' racists ' post on PH these days. Did you cut the address out yourself ?

[Hoink]

Vanden Saab said:

alfie2244 said:

Hoink said:

My mate struggled with the literature but luckily there is an arrow telling him where to stick his cross on the ballot paper.

Like this?

bonus for the pen...

Yep! Very good!

[gooner1]

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

And I’ve explained my definition of Is on that poster numerous times, it has nothing to do with the question I asked about Norway, why not discuss that rather than deflect.

My views about that poster are clear you can obviously disagree with them but it really is tiresome

I have already discussed, or to be precise answered your Norway question.
No deflection on my part, a simple quest for clarification due to previous remarks from
yourself dictated that a definition was in this case perhaps the best course of action.
I'll leave you to your nap now.

Right so if you accept Norway is not a member of the EU but has to abide by some of it’s rules can you accept that ceasing being a member of the EU doesn’t automatically mean the UK will not have to abide by any of its rules?

By the same token, can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Answering a question with a question again I see.

No ive stated my case and my opinion numerous times that it was a lie and I’m sticking to it, are you going to bring that up constantly because I will answer the same everytime.

The Norway question has nothing to do with that so can you answer the question or not?

Then I'll keep reposting the same question.

[christian-ohtc3]

techiedave said:

A bit of a mixed bag recently
The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.

Going by the posts on here it seems more like the remain voters who struggle with the basic grasp of percentages than leave voters. Just saying

[chrispmartha]

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

And I’ve explained my definition of Is on that poster numerous times, it has nothing to do with the question I asked about Norway, why not discuss that rather than deflect.

My views about that poster are clear you can obviously disagree with them but it really is tiresome

I have already discussed, or to be precise answered your Norway question.
No deflection on my part, a simple quest for clarification due to previous remarks from
yourself dictated that a definition was in this case perhaps the best course of action.
I'll leave you to your nap now.

Right so if you accept Norway is not a member of the EU but has to abide by some of it’s rules can you accept that ceasing being a member of the EU doesn’t automatically mean the UK will not have to abide by any of its rules?

By the same token, can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Answering a question with a question again I see.

No ive stated my case and my opinion numerous times that it was a lie and I’m sticking to it, are you going to bring that up constantly because I will answer the same everytime.

The Norway question has nothing to do with that so can you answer the question or not?

Then I'll keep reposting the same question.

I take that as you won’t answer the question then.

[gooner1]

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

And I’ve explained my definition of Is on that poster numerous times, it has nothing to do with the question I asked about Norway, why not discuss that rather than deflect.

My views about that poster are clear you can obviously disagree with them but it really is tiresome

I have already discussed, or to be precise answered your Norway question.
No deflection on my part, a simple quest for clarification due to previous remarks from
yourself dictated that a definition was in this case perhaps the best course of action.
I'll leave you to your nap now.

Right so if you accept Norway is not a member of the EU but has to abide by some of it’s rules can you accept that ceasing being a member of the EU doesn’t automatically mean the UK will not have to abide by any of its rules?

By the same token, can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Answering a question with a question again I see.

No ive stated my case and my opinion numerous times that it was a lie and I’m sticking to it, are you going to bring that up constantly because I will answer the same everytime.

The Norway question has nothing to do with that so can you answer the question or not?

Then I'll keep reposting the same question.

I take that as you won’t answer the question then.

Can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

[Squiddly Diddly]

Get a room.

[SeeFive]

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

And I’ve explained my definition of Is on that poster numerous times, it has nothing to do with the question I asked about Norway, why not discuss that rather than deflect.

My views about that poster are clear you can obviously disagree with them but it really is tiresome

I have already discussed, or to be precise answered your Norway question.
No deflection on my part, a simple quest for clarification due to previous remarks from
yourself dictated that a definition was in this case perhaps the best course of action.
I'll leave you to your nap now.

Right so if you accept Norway is not a member of the EU but has to abide by some of it’s rules can you accept that ceasing being a member of the EU doesn’t automatically mean the UK will not have to abide by any of its rules?

By the same token, can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Answering a question with a question again I see.

No ive stated my case and my opinion numerous times that it was a lie and I’m sticking to it, are you going to bring that up constantly because I will answer the same everytime.

The Norway question has nothing to do with that so can you answer the question or not?

Then I'll keep reposting the same question.

He answered two days ago. Can’t believe this is still going on.

chrispmartha said:

Yes I still assert it. Turkey was not or indeed was joining the EU at the time, that outcome was yet to be decided so it couldn’t truthfully be asserted either way.
.

So therefore, the fact that at that moment in time, Chris almost concedes that Turkey was “in the process of” joining the E.U., according to Chris, but with no clear outcome it was absolutely dead certain lie (can’t remember his exact words), no doubt, no question even though the bold being the only correct thing he has had to say on the matter in two days.

He is a very confused chap. Best left to work it out for himself. The poster in his mind was earlier stated to be a lie because it didn’t say “in the process of”.

Seriously, that is his issue. He hasn’t worked out that without the late 2016 Turkish coup, and the heavy handed Turkish response that caused the E.U. to suspend the joining process, Turkey would probably still be joining today.

Now can we get back to laughing at remainers thinking that they can change groundswell by throwing mud at Farage?

[alfie2244]

Squiddly Diddly said:

Get a room.

He could call it the "chrispmartha's 4 hour minimum argument room"

Subtitled allcomers welcome but no 5 minute arguments please.

[chrispmartha]

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

And I’ve explained my definition of Is on that poster numerous times, it has nothing to do with the question I asked about Norway, why not discuss that rather than deflect.

My views about that poster are clear you can obviously disagree with them but it really is tiresome

I have already discussed, or to be precise answered your Norway question.
No deflection on my part, a simple quest for clarification due to previous remarks from
yourself dictated that a definition was in this case perhaps the best course of action.
I'll leave you to your nap now.

Right so if you accept Norway is not a member of the EU but has to abide by some of it’s rules can you accept that ceasing being a member of the EU doesn’t automatically mean the UK will not have to abide by any of its rules?

By the same token, can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Answering a question with a question again I see.

No ive stated my case and my opinion numerous times that it was a lie and I’m sticking to it, are you going to bring that up constantly because I will answer the same everytime.

The Norway question has nothing to do with that so can you answer the question or not?

Then I'll keep reposting the same question.

I take that as you won’t answer the question then.

Can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Why would I have to accept that for you to answer a question?

If you can’t or won't answer the question that’s fine just say so.

It’s no better than a school playground in here.

[gooner1]

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

And I’ve explained my definition of Is on that poster numerous times, it has nothing to do with the question I asked about Norway, why not discuss that rather than deflect.

My views about that poster are clear you can obviously disagree with them but it really is tiresome

I have already discussed, or to be precise answered your Norway question.
No deflection on my part, a simple quest for clarification due to previous remarks from
yourself dictated that a definition was in this case perhaps the best course of action.
I'll leave you to your nap now.

Right so if you accept Norway is not a member of the EU but has to abide by some of it’s rules can you accept that ceasing being a member of the EU doesn’t automatically mean the UK will not have to abide by any of its rules?

By the same token, can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Answering a question with a question again I see.

No ive stated my case and my opinion numerous times that it was a lie and I’m sticking to it, are you going to bring that up constantly because I will answer the same everytime.

The Norway question has nothing to do with that so can you answer the question or not?

Then I'll keep reposting the same question.

I take that as you won’t answer the question then.

Can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Why would I have to accept that for you to answer a question?

If you can’t or won't answer the question that’s fine just say so.

It’s no better than a school playground in here.

You don't have to accept anything.
But until you do, Can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

[chrispmartha]

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

And I’ve explained my definition of Is on that poster numerous times, it has nothing to do with the question I asked about Norway, why not discuss that rather than deflect.

My views about that poster are clear you can obviously disagree with them but it really is tiresome

I have already discussed, or to be precise answered your Norway question.
No deflection on my part, a simple quest for clarification due to previous remarks from
yourself dictated that a definition was in this case perhaps the best course of action.
I'll leave you to your nap now.

Right so if you accept Norway is not a member of the EU but has to abide by some of it’s rules can you accept that ceasing being a member of the EU doesn’t automatically mean the UK will not have to abide by any of its rules?

By the same token, can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Answering a question with a question again I see.

No ive stated my case and my opinion numerous times that it was a lie and I’m sticking to it, are you going to bring that up constantly because I will answer the same everytime.

The Norway question has nothing to do with that so can you answer the question or not?

Then I'll keep reposting the same question.

I take that as you won’t answer the question then.

Can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Why would I have to accept that for you to answer a question?

If you can’t or won't answer the question that’s fine just say so.

It’s no better than a school playground in here.

You don't have to accept anything.
But until you do, Can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

And, we’re done.

[Otis Criblecoblis]

chrispmartha said:

And, we’re done.

Probably for the best.

[gooner1]

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

gooner1 said:

chrispmartha said:

And I’ve explained my definition of Is on that poster numerous times, it has nothing to do with the question I asked about Norway, why not discuss that rather than deflect.

My views about that poster are clear you can obviously disagree with them but it really is tiresome

I have already discussed, or to be precise answered your Norway question.
No deflection on my part, a simple quest for clarification due to previous remarks from
yourself dictated that a definition was in this case perhaps the best course of action.
I'll leave you to your nap now.

Right so if you accept Norway is not a member of the EU but has to abide by some of it’s rules can you accept that ceasing being a member of the EU doesn’t automatically mean the UK will not have to abide by any of its rules?

By the same token, can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Answering a question with a question again I see.

No ive stated my case and my opinion numerous times that it was a lie and I’m sticking to it, are you going to bring that up constantly because I will answer the same everytime.

The Norway question has nothing to do with that so can you answer the question or not?

Then I'll keep reposting the same question.

I take that as you won’t answer the question then.

Can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

Why would I have to accept that for you to answer a question?

If you can’t or won't answer the question that’s fine just say so.

It’s no better than a school playground in here.

You don't have to accept anything.
But until you do, Can you accept that " Turkey is joining the EU" was not a lie ?

And, we’re done.

TFFT.

[TeamD]

gooner1 said:

TFFT.

He'll back tomorrow.

[SeeFive]

TeamD said:

gooner1 said:

TFFT.

He'll back tomorrow.

Mindset (mīnd′sĕt′)
n.
1. A fixed mental attitude or disposition that predetermines a person's responses to and interpretations of situations.
2. An inclination or a habit.

[FiF]

If it does start up again tomorrow then for one I'll be requesting from the mods.