Climate protesters block roads

Author
Discussion

Cold

15,248 posts

90 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all


Checked it. It looks to be doing climatey type things. Nice costumes though.

Vanden Saab

14,107 posts

74 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
Cold said:


Checked it. It looks to be doing climatey type things. Nice costumes though.
Has this picture escaped from the gender neutral thread?

TeamD

4,913 posts

232 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
Cold said:
Nice costumes though.
Of course that'll have a negative carbon footprint, of course it will, mutter, mutter confused

Cold

15,248 posts

90 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
Vanden Saab said:
Cold said:


Checked it. It looks to be doing climatey type things. Nice costumes though.
Has this picture escaped from the gender neutral thread?
Have you just assumed my CO2 footprint?
Outraged!

Diderot

7,322 posts

192 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
El Stovey is left of centre (ho ho), Gadgetmac is out of place, pictured, centrally.


jurbie

2,343 posts

201 months

Tuesday 16th April 2019
quotequote all
Helicopter123 said:
This can only be a good thing as we really aren't doing enough to cut CO2.

The irony is the ULEZ is a fantastic start and shows London to be well ahead of rUK.
A good example of just how misinformed people are on the subject. Nearly 11 years ago the Climate Change Act came into force which commits us to cut our CO2 emissions by 80% by 2050. The cost is estimated at £18 billion per year, every year, until 2050. The last I heard we were spending around £10 billion a year so depending on your point of view the original was a wild over estimate or we are backsliding a little, take your pic. Either way £10 billion a year really can't be described as not doing enough.

The act was drafted by Baroness Bryony Worthington who was formerly somebody high up at Friends of the Earth so she probably knows what she's talking about when it comes to coming up with a plan to cut CO2 emissions. But apparently you and this lot in London don't think that's good enough. Fair enough I suppose, after all we have all apparently had enough of experts so what would she know anyway?

The ULEZ is about air quality and has nothing to do with CO2, indeed it possibly wouldn't be required if the government hadn't bribed everybody to drive diesels because they have lower CO2 emissions.


B'stard Child

28,419 posts

246 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
jurbie said:
Helicopter123 said:
This can only be a good thing as we really aren't doing enough to cut CO2.

The irony is the ULEZ is a fantastic start and shows London to be well ahead of rUK.
A good example of just how misinformed people are on the subject. Nearly 11 years ago the Climate Change Act came into force which commits us to cut our CO2 emissions by 80% by 2050. The cost is estimated at £18 billion per year, every year, until 2050. The last I heard we were spending around £10 billion a year so depending on your point of view the original was a wild over estimate or we are backsliding a little, take your pic. Either way £10 billion a year really can't be described as not doing enough.

The act was drafted by Baroness Bryony Worthington who was formerly somebody high up at Friends of the Earth so she probably knows what she's talking about when it comes to coming up with a plan to cut CO2 emissions. But apparently you and this lot in London don't think that's good enough. Fair enough I suppose, after all we have all apparently had enough of experts so what would she know anyway?

The ULEZ is about air quality and has nothing to do with CO2, indeed it possibly wouldn't be required if the government hadn't bribed everybody to drive diesels because they have lower CO2 emissions.
You are wasting your time here trying to debate with budgie - but you knew that right?

He only has three posting modes

"True Patriot" - used when someone (in a position of power/authority) says something negative about Brexit

"Good Post" - Used when someone on PH says something negative about Brexit

"Utter wibble" - when none of the above applies



TeamD

4,913 posts

232 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
Cold said:
Have you just assumed my CO2 footprint?
Outraged!
Erm, what? No, them, I meant. But that aside, wtf are they supposed to be? confused

That said, feel free to be outraged, everyone else is and it would be a shame to miss out smile

Cold

15,248 posts

90 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
TeamD said:
Cold said:
Have you just assumed my CO2 footprint?
Outraged!
Erm, what? No, them, I meant. But that aside, wtf are they supposed to be? confused

That said, feel free to be outraged, everyone else is and it would be a shame to miss out smile
I think I've used up all my outrage quota for the moment, but I get a single occupancy discount - or something.
Mind you, I'm in London over the weekend for a beer tasting thingy with a few friends and if that gets disrupted due to some hand wringers I'll be a touch annoyed.


Here's another pic of our fashion heroes on Waterloo Bridge. If you're of a certain age you might think that they look like they're justified and they're ancient.




The Guardian has a gallery of photos from today . Here's one that caught my eye:




anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
Cold said:


Checked it. It looks to be doing climatey type things. Nice costumes though.
Is it a Dr and the medics tribute band ?

TeamD

4,913 posts

232 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
techiedave said:
Is it a Dr and the medics tribute band ?
That did occur to me too biglaugh

grantone

640 posts

173 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
Cold said:
...



...
It's all rather counter productive if their intention is really to change public opinion, images like this are more likely to put people off than recruit them to the cause. 'All that green nonsense is just for those disruptive workshy dirty hippies.'

Oh well, the economics will decide the winners anyway.

TeamD

4,913 posts

232 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
At the risk of upsetting some of the more emotionally fragile members of PH...

Is it reasonable to conclude that there are a worrying amount of folk out there that are completely batst crazy? I mean, "Ban lawn mowers" etc? How can these people take themselves seriously?

KAgantua

3,875 posts

131 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
Cold said:
TeamD said:
Cold said:
Have you just assumed my CO2 footprint?
Outraged!
Erm, what? No, them, I meant. But that aside, wtf are they supposed to be? confused

That said, feel free to be outraged, everyone else is and it would be a shame to miss out smile
I think I've used up all my outrage quota for the moment, but I get a single occupancy discount - or something.
Mind you, I'm in London over the weekend for a beer tasting thingy with a few friends and if that gets disrupted due to some hand wringers I'll be a touch annoyed.


Here's another pic of our fashion heroes on Waterloo Bridge. If you're of a certain age you might think that they look like they're justified and they're ancient.




The Guardian has a gallery of photos from today . Here's one that caught my eye:



Looks like the police have kettled them in and are not allowing them to roam the land....

T-195

2,671 posts

61 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all

jmflare

413 posts

141 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
Helicopter123 said:
I'm better than most people.
Could i get your address please, i've an old LDV i'd like to park across your drive tomorrow morning just before you set off for work.

Cheers

T-195

2,671 posts

61 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
Reminds me of a headline from The Onion.

"Gay Rights March sets back Gay Rights Movement by 50 Years"

BrassMan

1,484 posts

189 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
sanguinary said:
I've got effing blood on my hands...
Maybe they recognised your user name?
scratchchin

garagewidow

1,502 posts

170 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
TeamD said:
At the risk of upsetting some of the more emotionally fragile members of PH...

Is it reasonable to conclude that there are a worrying amount of folk out there that are completely batst crazy? I mean, "Ban lawn mowers" etc? How can these people take themselves seriously?
What! even electric ones?

I thought of going down there with some comedy placards to wave around but feared they would smear me in avocado then throw lentils at me.

Mothersruin

8,573 posts

99 months

Wednesday 17th April 2019
quotequote all
One of these pillocks was just on Sky with Adam Bolton, who ripped him a new one.

Was funny, very sad, but very funny too.