Climate protesters block roads

Author
Discussion

R Mutt

5,891 posts

72 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
slartibartfast said:
lornemalvo said:
Greta Thunberg doesn't have to endure a horrible commute to work, or worry about losing pay for being late, or put food on the table and pay the bills, or support a family. She's an inconsiderate, ill informed zealot
I once wrote similar on one of the XR facebook pages, someone wrote back words to the effect of 'Your commute to work will end with rising tides, famine and death' or words to that effect.

Some of them have turned it into a death cult/end of the world religion.

personally I wish they all fk off and get back to work and help the world go around.... wkers!
Work = Capitalism

Digga

40,317 posts

283 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
wc98 said:
Digga said:
Blakewater said:
GOATever said:
Can the money not be taken as proceeds of crime and put towards the costs to the police and victims of the protests? What about the people who've lost business or had their wages docked because of the disruption?
Just the sort of useless, demented clunge you'd imagine working for the governments latest interference in a private pension industry it screwed up itself with Gordon Brown's tax credit grab and then scrambled yet further with the stakeholder fiasco. Explains a lot.

BBC said:
anded in his notice at Nest - the National Employment Savings Trust
"However, as a former businessman he also brings a certain gravitas to the matter."

re the bold, at least there is one person at the bbc with a sense of humour .not a word that many, if any,would associate with these clowns.
My thoughts exactly, although I am not sure it is humour or just the abject lack of a clue that comes from being within the media bubble.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Digga said:
wc98 said:
Digga said:
Blakewater said:
GOATever said:
Can the money not be taken as proceeds of crime and put towards the costs to the police and victims of the protests? What about the people who've lost business or had their wages docked because of the disruption?
Just the sort of useless, demented clunge you'd imagine working for the governments latest interference in a private pension industry it screwed up itself with Gordon Brown's tax credit grab and then scrambled yet further with the stakeholder fiasco. Explains a lot.

BBC said:
anded in his notice at Nest - the National Employment Savings Trust
"However, as a former businessman he also brings a certain gravitas to the matter."

re the bold, at least there is one person at the bbc with a sense of humour .not a word that many, if any,would associate with these clowns.
My thoughts exactly, although I am not sure it is humour or just the abject lack of a clue that comes from being within the media bubble.
hehe

Blakewater

4,309 posts

157 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
I don't suppose XR protesters are paying income tax on what XR is paying them. I wonder if XR is paying into a pensions scheme for them as, in a way, it's acting as an employer.

People like this guy quitting their jobs to join XR are basically just examples of people having nervous breakdowns. They can't cope with life, work and their responsibilities so chuck it all in to be Hippies. They just try to dress it up to be a rational choice.

Edited by Blakewater on Tuesday 29th October 20:57

Supercilious Sid

2,575 posts

161 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Blakewater said:
I don't suppose XR protesters are paying income tax on what XR is paying them. I wonder if XR is paying into a pensions scheme for them as, in a way, it's acting as an employer.

People like this guy quitting their jobs to join XR are basically just examples of people having nervous breakdowns. They can't cope with life, work and their responsibilities so chuck it all in to be Hippies. They just try to dress it up to be a rational choice.

Edited by Blakewater on Tuesday 29th October 20:57
Plus as a middle aged guy you get to hang around with lots of impressionable young girlies.


motco

15,956 posts

246 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
I hope none of the little darlings have asthma because the carbon footprint of inhalers is apparently equivalent to that of meat-eaters! rolleyes

T-195

2,671 posts

61 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
motco said:
I hope none of the little darlings have asthma because the carbon footprint of inhalers is apparently equivalent to that of meat-eaters! rolleyes
Heard that earlier.

Asthma sufferers will be shot at dawn.

R Mutt

5,891 posts

72 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
motco said:
I hope none of the little darlings have asthma because the carbon footprint of inhalers is apparently equivalent to that of meat-eaters! rolleyes
It's OK we might just stop breathing.

Langweilig

4,326 posts

211 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
motco said:
I hope none of the little darlings have asthma because the carbon footprint of inhalers is apparently equivalent to that of meat-eaters! rolleyes
True. Researchers at Cambridge University have found that it would be better to switch to dry powder inhalers as it would save the NHS million of pounds and it would help combat climate change.

Asthmatic attacks have the potential to kill. If I'm wheezing uncontrollably and have minutes left to live, screw fking climate change. It's a matter of self-preservation.

turbobloke

103,953 posts

260 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
T-195 said:
motco said:
I hope none of the little darlings have asthma because the carbon footprint of inhalers is apparently equivalent to that of meat-eaters! rolleyes
Heard that earlier.

Asthma sufferers will be shot at dawn.
Which with burial results in carbon dioxide being released more slowly than burning at the stake. Won't somebody think of the carbons

silly

Langweilig said:
Researchers at Cambridge University have found that it would be better to switch to dry powder inhalers as it would save the NHS million of pounds and it would help combat climate change.

Asthmatic attacks have the potential to kill. If I'm wheezing uncontrollably and have minutes left to live, screw fking climate change. It's a matter of self-preservation.
You were already spot on when you got to "It's a matter of" and nothing changed afterwards smile

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
Langweilig said:
...If I'm wheezing uncontrollably and have minutes left to live, screw fking climate change. It's a matter of self-preservation.
How dare you!

Yertis

18,051 posts

266 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
Langweilig said:
motco said:
I hope none of the little darlings have asthma because the carbon footprint of inhalers is apparently equivalent to that of meat-eaters! rolleyes
True. Researchers at Cambridge University have found that it would be better to switch to dry powder inhalers as it would save the NHS million of pounds and it would help combat climate change.

Asthmatic attacks have the potential to kill. If I'm wheezing uncontrollably and have minutes left to live, screw fking climate change. It's a matter of self-preservation.
I've never used the dry powder ones. But rather than the usual knee-jerk "Let's ban it!" attitude to the aerosol ones (which I do have use of) they could:

a. Educate suffers to use their inhalers correctly – very few of the asthmatics I know use them correctly (they tend to just puff into open mouths like fresh-great scary) which means they use them far more than they need to.

b. The plastic component of the aerosol inhalers is perfectly reusable, but instead they're disposable. It would be easy to beef that up into a less disposable artefact and just dole out the aerosol cans that plug in. Those components are are metal and easily recyclable.


Blakewater

4,309 posts

157 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
Rupert Reid has been trying to draw children into his Doomesday cult.

https://metro.co.uk/2019/10/29/climate-scientists-...


It was interesting to note that the politically correct brigade on Twitter weren't so keen to uphold science when they responded to a tweet from Cancer Research about obesity being one of the leading causes of Cancer. They were quick to insist saying such a thing was fat shaming and it's not true at all that being obese is bad for your health. There were many responses claiming this from the sort of people who feel the need to state their pronouns on their Twitter profiles.


alfaman

6,416 posts

234 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Langweilig said:
True. Researchers at Cambridge University have found that it would be better to switch to dry powder inhalers as it would save the NHS million of pounds and it would help combat climate change.

Asthmatic attacks have the potential to kill. If I'm wheezing uncontrollably and have minutes left to live, screw fking climate change. It's a matter of self-preservation.
I was quite asthmatic in my late teens... the dry powder inhalers were not easy to use.

The climate impact of ventolin inhalers must be trivial compared to other aerosol products surely.

In any case they are life saving.

Dying from an asthma attack certainly ‘ruins ones childhood’ more than sailing across the Atlantic on a carbon yacht

eccles

13,733 posts

222 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
alfaman said:
The climate impact of ventolin inhalers must be trivial compared to other aerosol products surely.
Maybe read the news story, you'll be surprised!

768

13,680 posts

96 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
eccles said:
alfaman said:
The climate impact of ventolin inhalers must be trivial compared to other aerosol products surely.
Maybe read the news story, you'll be surprised!
Yeah, I think I read that it came out as 4% of the entire NHS carbon output. Which I'd suggest is pretty significant and at least worth looking at.

Jinx

11,391 posts

260 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
768 said:
Yeah, I think I read that it came out as 4% of the entire NHS carbon output. Which I'd suggest is pretty significant and at least worth looking at.
Erm when the UK only produces <1% of global CO2 emission and inhalers only produce 4% of NHS emissions then the word "significant" becomes insignificant.
Context is very useful when discussing numbers.

alangla

4,787 posts

181 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
768 said:
eccles said:
alfaman said:
The climate impact of ventolin inhalers must be trivial compared to other aerosol products surely.
Maybe read the news story, you'll be surprised!
Yeah, I think I read that it came out as 4% of the entire NHS carbon output. Which I'd suggest is pretty significant and at least worth looking at.
I thought it wasn't CO2, it was CO2 equivalent and the inhalers were reported as using HydroFlouroAlkane - I'd imagine that's probably not that different from Methane or a CFC in terms of its greenhouse effect.
Other aerosols use things like Butane, CO2 or, I think, compressed air as a propellant, each of which has a much smaller greenhouse effect.

kev1974

4,029 posts

129 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
if we are starting to look at climate change impact of health products, shouldn't we be looking at pill packaging? Some people are on eight or so different prescription pills a day, the amount of plastic and foil used to package all those pills individually plus the colourful card boxes and included paper leaflets that all go straight in the bin is incredible. All because the public cant be trusted to take pills out of glass bottles or small tubs any more, they have to be packaged in individual pill blister packs.

R Mutt

5,891 posts

72 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
alangla said:
I thought it wasn't CO2, it was CO2 equivalent and the inhalers were reported as using HydroFlouroAlkane - I'd imagine that's probably not that different from Methane or a CFC in terms of its greenhouse effect.
Other aerosols use things like Butane, CO2 or, I think, compressed air as a propellant, each of which has a much smaller greenhouse effect.
Air?! How disgraceful.

Next you'll be telling me it contains Hydrogen Dioxide