Climate protesters block roads

Author
Discussion

Mandalore

4,220 posts

114 months

Tuesday 18th February 2020
quotequote all
menousername said:
Methinks (tinfoil hat) its to encourage us to turn anti-protest generally

Get us seething about XR lot until we are asking for more strict intervention at such protests

Huge discrepancy between this response and the response to the anti capitalist protests in London a few years ago. Although admittedly they did not end well.
Any organisation that cannot distinguish between a peaceful protest and vandalism, doesn’t need any further help.

A Winner Is You

24,992 posts

228 months

Tuesday 18th February 2020
quotequote all
Blimey, the police just realised that standing next to them whilst the commit criminal damage might not have been the best tactic

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshi...

Peter911

484 posts

158 months

Tuesday 18th February 2020
quotequote all
Have the police been charged with aiding and abetting?

kev1974

4,029 posts

130 months

Tuesday 18th February 2020
quotequote all
Hope the gardeners and turf suppliers that come to repair the lawn leave the electric van at home and bring the diesel fleet that week.

Blakewater

4,311 posts

158 months

Tuesday 18th February 2020
quotequote all
This chap was convicted of obstructing a public highway in 2017 when he obstructed traffic for just five minutes to protest against male circumcision.

He had his appeal refused.

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5b4dbf3e2c94...



The European Court of Human Rights upheld a Lithuanian conviction of farmers blocking a highway.

file:///C:/Users/44779/Downloads/Grand%20Chamber%20Judgment%20Kudrevicius%20and%20Others%20v.%20Lithuania%20-%20conviction%20of%20five%20farmers%20for%20reprehensible%20conduct%20.pdf


It's also worth comparing police inaction here with the police confronting a man in his workplace over a perhaps slightly crass but non-threatening comment made on Twitter. Short of direct bullying, something said on Twitter doesn't affect people's lives in the way blocking a road and forcing ambulances to turn around does.

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/crime/police-...

Edited by Blakewater on Tuesday 18th February 23:24

Ridgemont

6,599 posts

132 months

Tuesday 18th February 2020
quotequote all
Blakewater said:
This chap was convicted of obstructing a public highway in 2017 when he obstructed traffic for just five minutes to protest against male circumcision.

He had his appeal refused.

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5b4dbf3e2c94...



The European Court of Human Rights upheld a Lithuanian conviction of farmers blocking a highway.

file:///C:/Users/44779/Downloads/Grand%20Chamber%20Judgment%20Kudrevicius%20and%20Others%20v.%20Lithuania%20-%20conviction%20of%20five%20farmers%20for%20reprehensible%20conduct%20.pdf


It's also worth comparing police inaction here with the police confronting a man in his workplace over a perhaps slightly crass but non-threatening comment made on Twitter. Short of direct bullying, something said on Twitter doesn't affect people's lives in the way blocking a road and forcing ambulances to turn around does.

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/crime/police-...

Edited by Blakewater on Tuesday 18th February 23:24
As Allison Pearson notes in the Telegraph in a pretty damning article the brilliance of the Cambs constab though was to pretty much connive with XR. They shut roads in advance therefore nothing was blocked and nothing illegal happened.

Likewise until all hell broke out yesterday it looks like Trinity had no intention of filing charges and therefore nothing illegal (nope nothing to see here) happened.

As she rightly points out XR are idiotic brats. The actual indictment is on institutions that should know better.

Make of that what you will.


Edited by Ridgemont on Wednesday 19th February 00:01

kev1974

4,029 posts

130 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
There was a phase when Fathers 4 Justice would commonly climb up a road sign gantry / overpass / bridge, and the police would close the road underneath. I'm not sure if they were ever charged with anything.

deeps

5,393 posts

242 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
I hear there's a new rapidly expanding group called Rebellion Extinction claphehe




turbobloke

104,046 posts

261 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
A Winner Is You said:
Blimey, the police just realised that standing next to them whilst the commit criminal damage might not have been the best tactic

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshi...
Good news on the criminal damage front...but how can that be, when we've been told in this thread they had permission to dig up the lawn? That would be a pretty good defence - if true, which it isn't.

Clearly no such permission was granted and (the lack of) a report to police is no longer lacking. Obstructing police is another matter and it's equally encouraging to see further arrests took place on that basis.

The reason for damaging the environment at Trinity is reported as being a protest against destruction of nature. FFS.

Dont like rolls

3,798 posts

55 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
They were "Re-Wilding" the lawn, they are human Badgers you know and those TB infected bds do that to lawns all the time.

A Winner Is You

24,992 posts

228 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
It is up to them to decide who gets to use a public highway. Make sure you plan those medical emergencies in advance

https://twitter.com/xryouthcambs/status/1229705341...

Vanden Saab

14,150 posts

75 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
A Winner Is You said:
It is up to them to decide who gets to use a public highway. Make sure you plan those medical emergencies in advance

https://twitter.com/xryouthcambs/status/1229705341...
Love the comment underneath...
member of the public said:
in the case of a medical emergency, i won't be stopping. Advance notice given

Agammemnon

1,628 posts

59 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Pesty said:
CrutyRammers said:
Incredibly poor judgement by the police there.
The police are not there to help you or protect you.
Absolute rubbish.
It seems to be an accurate reflection of recent events in Cambridge & elsewhere.

essayer

9,084 posts

195 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Because it's their property, they're essentially letting XR dig it up.

There is no crime.
nice, nice

turbobloke

104,046 posts

261 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
Agammemnon said:
Greendubber said:
Pesty said:
CrutyRammers said:
Incredibly poor judgement by the police there.
The police are not there to help you or protect you.
Absolute rubbish.
It seems to be an accurate reflection of recent events in Cambridge & elsewhere.
Yes indeed, the stark difference between words and actions laid bare.

Greendubber

13,222 posts

204 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
A Winner Is You said:
Blimey, the police just realised that standing next to them whilst the commit criminal damage might not have been the best tactic

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshi...
Or in reality Trinity thought it was a good idea to make a complaint to the police about the damahe. Shock horror, people have been arrested as a result.


Greendubber

13,222 posts

204 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
Agammemnon said:
Greendubber said:
Pesty said:
CrutyRammers said:
Incredibly poor judgement by the police there.
The police are not there to help you or protect you.
Absolute rubbish.
It seems to be an accurate reflection of recent events in Cambridge & elsewhere.
It really isn't.

Agammemnon

1,628 posts

59 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
It really isn't.
Oh well- if you say so then that settles it.

Greendubber

13,222 posts

204 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
Agammemnon said:
Greendubber said:
It really isn't.
Oh well- if you say so then that settles it.
Coming from the person who thinks response to XR protests reflects the police are not there to protect or help anyone, anywhere, ever.

So right back at you, if you say so that must settle it. Let's not forget the thousands of police officers up and down the country that are trying their very best to help people on a daily basis in difficult circumstances but I'm guessing that doesn't fit into your narrow mind though. Best just make a massive generalisation instead eh?

turbobloke

104,046 posts

261 months

Wednesday 19th February 2020
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Agammemnon said:
Greendubber said:
It really isn't.
Oh well- if you say so then that settles it.
Coming from the person who thinks response to XR protests reflects the police are not there to protect or help anyone, anywhere, ever.
It didn't look that generalised to me, I must have missed the anyone/anywhere/ever claims - are we not discussing the recent woeful police response to XR unlawful behaviour in Cambridge?