Senior Politician caught drinking on train
Discussion
Johnnytheboy said:
LoonyTunes said:
Tryke3 said:
techiedave said:
As someone else so eloquently put it:
"Don't feed him.
Look at his posting history.
He posts something to provoke and then flounces."
I dont flounce, there is literaly no point in having a conversation with 98% of angry white dudes on on here, conversation is what you should have a with yourslef. And wtf listens to radio 4 ? "Don't feed him.
Look at his posting history.
He posts something to provoke and then flounces."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_racism "Covert racism is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious."
ETA: I mean after posting the above I look at page 2 of NP & E and yep - here's another DA thread
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Edited by LoonyTunes on Tuesday 23 April 12:53
LoonyTunes said:
Johnnytheboy said:
LoonyTunes said:
Tryke3 said:
techiedave said:
As someone else so eloquently put it:
"Don't feed him.
Look at his posting history.
He posts something to provoke and then flounces."
I dont flounce, there is literaly no point in having a conversation with 98% of angry white dudes on on here, conversation is what you should have a with yourslef. And wtf listens to radio 4 ? "Don't feed him.
Look at his posting history.
He posts something to provoke and then flounces."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_racism "Covert racism is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious."
ETA: I mean after posting the above I look at page 2 of NP & E and yep - here's another DA thread
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Maybe she receives a disproportionate amount of attention because she produces a disproportionate amount of gaffes, blunders, and general stupidity?
Nah, must be because shes a black woman. Ironically it seems you're the one who can't see past her skin colour and gender!
amusingduck said:
LoonyTunes said:
Johnnytheboy said:
LoonyTunes said:
Tryke3 said:
techiedave said:
As someone else so eloquently put it:
"Don't feed him.
Look at his posting history.
He posts something to provoke and then flounces."
I dont flounce, there is literaly no point in having a conversation with 98% of angry white dudes on on here, conversation is what you should have a with yourslef. And wtf listens to radio 4 ? "Don't feed him.
Look at his posting history.
He posts something to provoke and then flounces."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_racism "Covert racism is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious."
ETA: I mean after posting the above I look at page 2 of NP & E and yep - here's another DA thread
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Maybe she receives a disproportionate amount of attention because she produces a disproportionate amount of gaffes, blunders, and general stupidity?
Nah, must be because shes a black woman. Ironically it seems you're the one who can't see past her skin colour and gender!
I'll just wait until this afternoon when she gets another new thread all to herself. But it's not covert racism, honest guv.
LoonyTunes said:
Yeah, righto - How many threads does Boris Johnson get? Or JRM?
I'll just wait until this afternoon when she gets another new thread all to herself.
I'll just wait until this afternoon when she gets another new thread all to herself.
As you were
PH full of covert anti-white, anti-male posters, who knew?!
No matter which way you slice it, there's more results for Boris Johnson than DA on PH.
Edited by amusingduck on Tuesday 23 April 13:11
LoonyTunes said:
Johnnytheboy said:
LoonyTunes said:
Tryke3 said:
techiedave said:
As someone else so eloquently put it:
"Don't feed him.
Look at his posting history.
He posts something to provoke and then flounces."
I dont flounce, there is literaly no point in having a conversation with 98% of angry white dudes on on here, conversation is what you should have a with yourslef. And wtf listens to radio 4 ? "Don't feed him.
Look at his posting history.
He posts something to provoke and then flounces."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_racism "Covert racism is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious."
ETA: I mean after posting the above I look at page 2 of NP & E and yep - here's another DA thread
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
B'stard Child said:
amusingduck said:
No matter which way you slice it, there's more results for Boris Johnson than DA on PH.
That’s because so many DA threads have been deleted Lets also mention that a lot of the posts about Boris are in support of him - not something you could reasonably say about DA or at all actually as I've yet to see one.
LoonyTunes said:
TTwiggy said:
amusingduck said:
If DA is so popular on here because of her race and gender, you'll easily be able to post up other examples of people who receive a disproportionate amount of attention on here?
Muslims. HTH.LoonyTunes said:
Lets also mention that a lot of the posts about Boris are in support of him - not something you could reasonably say about DA or at all actually as I've yet to see one.
Literally this thread. Plenty of them.Heres two
amusingduck said:
SeeFive said:
Personally, as much as I feel that she may have exhibited past behaviours of a racist, hypocrite and is incompetent in her role etc, I find this type of reporting in MSM inflammatory across a number of possible spectrums and quite unsavoury.
Exactly what harm was she doing to anyone else? Divisive reporting and potentially quite intrusive and typical MSM trivia.
Attack her politics. Attack her capabilities. Yes she was breaking the law. But let the lady get on with her life and let the law enforce any transgressions she makes. This is another example of unnecessary trial by media IMHO.
We should let her go round and round on the circle line drinking 24x7. She will do a lot less damage than doing her normal job.
Completely agree. Who gives a sExactly what harm was she doing to anyone else? Divisive reporting and potentially quite intrusive and typical MSM trivia.
Attack her politics. Attack her capabilities. Yes she was breaking the law. But let the lady get on with her life and let the law enforce any transgressions she makes. This is another example of unnecessary trial by media IMHO.
We should let her go round and round on the circle line drinking 24x7. She will do a lot less damage than doing her normal job.
t?!The extrapolation some are making about her being a raging alcoholic is mental IMO. Maybe she just wanted a mojito?! It's not like she was hammered on kestral super and pissing on the seats, is it?!
TTwiggy said:
amusingduck said:
If DA is so popular on here because of her race and gender, you'll easily be able to post up other examples of people who receive a disproportionate amount of attention on here?
Muslims. HTH.LoonyTunes said:
How many different DA threads have there been? Just because nobody is calling her the actual name doesn't mean the spite isn't there because she's black. Being a female is probably the icing on the cake for a fair few.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_racism "Covert racism is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious."
ETA: I mean after posting the above I look at page 2 of NP & E and yep - here's another DA thread
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Wow. Just wow. Some people really are thick, or deliberate trolls.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_racism "Covert racism is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious."
ETA: I mean after posting the above I look at page 2 of NP & E and yep - here's another DA thread
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Edited by LoonyTunes on Tuesday 23 April 12:53
It's nothing to do with the fact she is black, or a woman. Its the fact she is a hypocritical, incompetent bigot who should have no place potentially holding one of the higest powered offices in the country should labour get into power. Someone who is responsible for making laws (even as a member of the opposition) who is flouting them and you seem to think that people who object to this are racist??? You sir are part of the problem. Stop being part of the problem.
- edit* just spotted the username. Yep, trolling. As you were everyone.
Edited by TriumphStag3.0V8 on Tuesday 23 April 13:34
oyster said:
The 09:01 Clapham Junction to Shepherds Bush takes 12 minutes and costs £1.70 on an oyster card.
The 09:06 Clapham Junction to Shepherds Bush takes 12 minutes and costs £1.70 on an oyster card.
On one of those you are legally allowed to drink alcohol. On the other you are not.
Now tell there isn't a more ridiculous law in the land?
quite possibly it is the most ridiculous - but it IS the law. Surely s such she should obey the bloody thing.The 09:06 Clapham Junction to Shepherds Bush takes 12 minutes and costs £1.70 on an oyster card.
On one of those you are legally allowed to drink alcohol. On the other you are not.
Now tell there isn't a more ridiculous law in the land?
As an aside to looney - look at the disproportionate lambasting that the sainted Maggie T gets from the left. Misogyny and racism there too?
amusingduck said:
TTwiggy said:
amusingduck said:
If DA is so popular on here because of her race and gender, you'll easily be able to post up other examples of people who receive a disproportionate amount of attention on here?
Muslims. HTH.It's not so much whether these incidents are newsworthy - clearly terrorism is very newsworthy - it's how quickly things on here often descend to lumping people together and ascribing the same view to all of them. Which is a clear definition of racism.
TTwiggy said:
amusingduck said:
TTwiggy said:
amusingduck said:
If DA is so popular on here because of her race and gender, you'll easily be able to post up other examples of people who receive a disproportionate amount of attention on here?
Muslims. HTH.It's not so much whether these incidents are newsworthy - clearly terrorism is very newsworthy - it's how quickly things on here often descend to lumping people together and ascribing the same view to all of them. Which is a clear definition of racism.
!Maybe it is just Brexit, but things do seem better on here than a few years ago. A lot of posters have come and gone in that time, I hope I'm right and I hope we don't find out for sure
amusingduck said:
Yeah, agreed. I know the kind of posts you refer to, although I didn't realise anyone was quoting mein kampf! !
Maybe it is just Brexit, but things do seem better on here than a few years ago. A lot of posters have come and gone in that time, I hope I'm right and I hope we don't find out for sure
I think you're right. !Maybe it is just Brexit, but things do seem better on here than a few years ago. A lot of posters have come and gone in that time, I hope I'm right and I hope we don't find out for sure
The Mein Kampf thing was quite amusing. Someone decided to do a little experiment by changing the 'Jews' to 'Muslims' in quotes from Hitler's book. He (or she) started with quite subtle stuff, and when it became clear that he'd (or she'd) hooked a few posters the quotes got ever-more disgusting, and still some posters agreed with the sentiment (with one or two 'I get the gist of what you're saying but you may be going a little far there chap!')
LoonyTunes said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_racism "Covert racism is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious."
It's staggering that you can seriously infer such Orwellian nonsense. So if a person doesn't display any racist behaviour whatsoever you can still proclaim them racist because you believe they are hiding their racism. It is literally up to you who is a racist regardless of how that person leads their life. Do you not perceive how sinister and revolting that is? Incidentally, I think you are a homophobe. I think you hate Gay people and are secretely appalled by their choices, I think you'd like to round them all up and destroy them. You just hide it well.
Do you think that is offensive?
Edited by br d on Tuesday 23 April 14:11
irocfan said:
As an aside to looney - look at the disproportionate lambasting that the sainted Maggie T gets from the left. Misogyny and racism there too?
If the Right were like the Left we'd spend the time accusing the Left of sexism, rather than trying to defend Thatcher's policies. br d said:
LoonyTunes said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_racism "Covert racism is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious."
It's staggering that you can seriously infer such Orwellian nonsense. So if a person doesn't display any racist behaviour whatsoever you can still proclaim them racist because you believe they are hiding their racism. It is literally up to you who is a racist regardless of how that person leads their life. Do you not perceive how sinister and revolting that is? Incidentally, I think you are a homophobe. I think you hate Gay people and are secretely appalled by their choices, I think you'd like to round them all up and destroy them. You just hide it well.
Do you think that is offensive?
Edited by br d on Tuesday 23 April 14:11
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff