Gulf of Oman incidents

Author
Discussion

Phud

1,262 posts

144 months

Tuesday 23rd July 2019
quotequote all
BMRuss said:
No matter, the Belgian, Slovakian, Czech and Austrian Naval forces will help sort this out as the Europeans have agreed to get involved, pah. biggrin
Don't miss out the Baltic States either..

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 23rd July 2019
quotequote all
BMRuss said:
No matter, the Belgian, Slovakian, Czech and Austrian Naval forces will help sort this out as the Europeans have agreed to get involved, pah. biggrin
I was given a tour of a Belgian ship's Exocet missile ops room. Very interesting. Toured with the Polish Navy who were purchasing the ship. Belgium was upgrading her naval capability; much of the Royal Belgian Navy was ex-US Navy.

Suspect the poster thought Belgium was landlocked (its not, remember Herald of Free Enterprise), and posted a clever clogs quip. Neither are the Baltic States (hint, Baltic Sea), though they have only a coastal defence force.

Phud

1,262 posts

144 months

Tuesday 23rd July 2019
quotequote all
MX5Biologist said:
I was given a tour of a Belgian ship's Exocet missile ops room. Very interesting. Toured with the Polish Navy who were purchasing the ship. Belgium was upgrading her naval capability; much of the Royal Belgian Navy was ex-US Navy.

Suspect the poster thought Belgium was landlocked (its not, remember Herald of Free Enterprise), and posted a clever clogs quip. Neither are the Baltic States (hint, Baltic Sea), though they have only a coastal defence force.
hint, blue against brown water navies.

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

124 months

Tuesday 23rd July 2019
quotequote all
Condi said:
Countdown said:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/...

Javed Zarif said:
Make no mistake. Having failed to lure Donald Trump into a War of the Century, and fearing collapse of his B Team, John Bolton is turning his venom against the UK in hopes of dragging it into a quagmire.”
John Bolton deliberately avoided Vietnam as he "had no desire to die in a South East Asian rice paddy"
John Bolton is a dangerous psychopath who would like nothing better than to nuke half the Middle East, although of course, like Trump, he avoided military service himself. The fact that man is anywhere near the decision making table shows how badly the US administration is managed.
John Bolton and his friends have the potential to cause more damage to Britain (and others) than any Iranian Mullah or Revolutionary Guard General could ever hope to do. The sooner he's sacked the better. We're only just getting over the mess Bush/Blair/Rumsfeld /Cheney etc caused - another military conflict in the Middle East would be a monumental act of self-harm.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

229 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
Iran have released some footage of them apparently telling a British warship to do one. hehe

Dear oh dear.

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
funkyrobot said:
Iran have released some footage of them apparently telling a British warship to do one. hehe

Dear oh dear.
The humiliation continues frown

98elise

26,644 posts

162 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
funkyrobot said:
Iran have released some footage of them apparently telling a British warship to do one. hehe

Dear oh dear.
The humiliation continues frown
How? A small gun boat warning a warship to "not to put your lives in danger"

I suspect the Warfare Officer was laughing his cock off at the "threat".

Just drop a single 4.5 shell through the gun boat from 30kms away. Maybe a salvo of HE shells at one every two seconds of you really want to ruin their day smile

https://youtu.be/K4P0N0f9fq0


Edited by 98elise on Monday 29th July 21:00

Burwood

18,709 posts

247 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
98elise said:
Gadgetmac said:
funkyrobot said:
Iran have released some footage of them apparently telling a British warship to do one. hehe

Dear oh dear.
The humiliation continues frown
How? A small gun boat warning a warship to "not to put your lives in danger"

I suspect the Warfare Officer was laughing his cock off at the "threat".

Just drop a single 4.5 shell through the gun boat from 30kms away. Maybe a salvo of HE shells at one every two seconds of you really want to ruin their day smile

https://youtu.be/K4P0N0f9fq0


Edited by 98elise on Monday 29th July 21:00
You mean a sea ray with a 1980s machine gun mounted to it. The only reason they took that stance was they Knew the Navy were well out of range and could do fk all.

HarryW

15,151 posts

270 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
98elise said:
Gadgetmac said:
funkyrobot said:
Iran have released some footage of them apparently telling a British warship to do one. hehe

Dear oh dear.
The humiliation continues frown
How? A small gun boat warning a warship to "not to put your lives in danger"

I suspect the Warfare Officer was laughing his cock off at the "threat".

Just drop a single 4.5 shell through the gun boat from 30kms away. Maybe a salvo of HE shells at one every two seconds of you really want to ruin their day smile

https://youtu.be/K4P0N0f9fq0


Edited by 98elise on Monday 29th July 21:00
You do know the Iranians had/have that gun too.....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvand-class_friga...

98elise

26,644 posts

162 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
HarryW said:
98elise said:
Gadgetmac said:
funkyrobot said:
Iran have released some footage of them apparently telling a British warship to do one. hehe

Dear oh dear.
The humiliation continues frown
How? A small gun boat warning a warship to "not to put your lives in danger"

I suspect the Warfare Officer was laughing his cock off at the "threat".

Just drop a single 4.5 shell through the gun boat from 30kms away. Maybe a salvo of HE shells at one every two seconds of you really want to ruin their day smile

https://youtu.be/K4P0N0f9fq0


Edited by 98elise on Monday 29th July 21:00
You do know the Iranians had/have that gun too.....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvand-class_friga...
They were issuing the threat from a small gun boat, not a warship. It was a laughable threat...not a humiliation for the RN.



Edited by 98elise on Tuesday 30th July 06:32

ecsrobin

17,127 posts

166 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
98elise said:
They were using the threat from a small gun boat, not a warship. It was a laughable threat...not a humiliation for the RN.
Although warships aren’t really geared up for taking on small gun boats are they?

Look at USS Cole.

HarryW

15,151 posts

270 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
98elise said:
They were using the threat from a small gun boat, not a warship. It was a laughable threat...not a humiliation for the RN.
Although warships aren’t really geared up for taking on small gun boats are they?

Look at USS Cole.
Hence

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/hms-sutherland-fir...

98elise

26,644 posts

162 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
98elise said:
They were using the threat from a small gun boat, not a warship. It was a laughable threat...not a humiliation for the RN.
Although warships aren’t really geared up for taking on small gun boats are they?

Look at USS Cole.
Yes they are. There are mini-gun mounts and 30mm cannons specifically for small fast boats.

Phalanx also has a surface mode for close in defence and the 4.5 is effective against surface targets (of any size) at a distance.

No modern warship should have a bind spot for small fast boats.


Edited by 98elise on Tuesday 30th July 08:00

ecsrobin

17,127 posts

166 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
98elise said:
Yes they are. There are mini-gun mounts and 30mm cannons specifically for small fast boats.

Phalanx also has a surface mode for close in defence and the 4.5 is effective against surface targets (of any size) at a distance.

No modern warship should have a bind spot for small fast boats.


Edited by 98elise on Tuesday 30th July 08:00
Looks very effective stopping the boat....

https://youtu.be/Yf8RExzMdfg

Earthdweller

13,590 posts

127 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
Although warships aren’t really geared up for taking on small gun boats are they?

Look at USS Cole.
I can’t see any relevance in the Cole incident at all

The Cole was moored alongside, non operational, and in the process of being refuelled when suicide bombers drive a high speed bomb into it side

Very different from an active warship at sea with weapons systems live

ecsrobin

17,127 posts

166 months

Tuesday 30th July 2019
quotequote all
Earthdweller said:
I can’t see any relevance in the Cole incident at all

The Cole was moored alongside, non operational, and in the process of being refuelled when suicide bombers drive a high speed bomb into it side

Very different from an active warship at sea with weapons systems live
Having been on a US warship at anchor in the UK it had troops stationed on .50cal guns around it. This was post USS Cole so not sure if that changed anything?

glazbagun

14,280 posts

198 months

Sunday 4th August 2019
quotequote all
Has anyone ever put a modern-ish frigate/destroyer up against a swarm of armed speedboats? I do wonder how effective a couple of destroyers can be opposite the actual coast of a rival country.

I remember that in the battle of Jutland the Germans use of MTB's discouraged Jellicoe from pursuing the fleet south.

There was also an American wargame around the millennium where the US General in charge of "Iran" decimated a US carrier group and resigned in protest when the rules were changed to provide easy victory for the Americans. It's worth a read if you fancy a laugh:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challen...


Edited by glazbagun on Sunday 4th August 16:08

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

94 months

Sunday 4th August 2019
quotequote all
rofl

NRS

22,188 posts

202 months

Sunday 4th August 2019
quotequote all
laugh

So their strategy works perfectly if the opposition side does exactly what it's told to do!

Mr Dendrite

2,315 posts

211 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
P&O have just cancelled Oceana’s Winter programme based out of Dubai, specifically because she is British registered. Other ships in the group Costa and Carnival will still be out there. Overall there were something like 9 cruises planned to be operating through the straights of Hormuz this winter season. It will interesting to see if any others decide the risk is too big.