Balanced Question Time panel tonight - of course not! Vol 3
Discussion
Graveworm said:
Oilchange said:
There is no logical argument for keeping this draconian tax. The licence needs to go and the beeb fund itself. I’m sure it would survive although not in this socialist form.
There is a logical argument, it may not persuade you, me or anyone it exists though. The logical argument is that it uniquely produces a ringfenced budget which cannot be re-allocated or leveraged. This increases the chance of it funding an independent broadcaster which is not reliant on commercial imperatives, external funding influences or even government budget allocation. So it can be impartial and produce some shows for educational & minority interests without needing to show a financial return. No other model, I have seen, allows for that. If it fails it's a practical issue around fallibility not a logical one.
But an institution in receipt of such a budget, under such terms, has very little motivation to return value for money, or to do what it should, over what it wants.
It becomes a ‘trust fund kid’. And how often are they impressive?
SpeckledJim said:
This is a good point.
But an institution in receipt of such a budget, under such terms, has very little motivation to return value for money, or to do what it should, over what it wants.
It becomes a ‘trust fund kid’. And how often are they impressive?
Almost like a proper government department But an institution in receipt of such a budget, under such terms, has very little motivation to return value for money, or to do what it should, over what it wants.
It becomes a ‘trust fund kid’. And how often are they impressive?
Cobnapint said:
tobinen said:
I wonder if the BBC opened up to a subscription service for the ROW, it could bring in enough money so UK viewers no longer have to pay.
Fine in theory, but the ROW could just use a VPN to pick a UK IP and watch it for nowt. In the same way that I do when I'm over seas and want to catch up on stuff.PushedDover said:
Cobnapint said:
tobinen said:
I wonder if the BBC opened up to a subscription service for the ROW, it could bring in enough money so UK viewers no longer have to pay.
Fine in theory, but the ROW could just use a VPN to pick a UK IP and watch it for nowt. In the same way that I do when I'm over seas and want to catch up on stuff.The bbc should give everyone with a paid for license a login and then restrict the access to iPlayer to logged in accounts only. All the technology already exists for that.
They could then also monetise the content for people in the ROW.
PushedDover said:
Penny will drop in a mo
It dropped first time!Those of us who are uk residents pay the license fee shouldn’t also need to buy a vpn service to watch the bbc from other countries.
Similarly those abroad shouldn’t be able to access the bbc content by simply paying some other company a few quid a month.
It’s unlikely that most of those who have a vpn service use it solely for one thing.
PushedDover said:
Cobnapint said:
tobinen said:
I wonder if the BBC opened up to a subscription service for the ROW, it could bring in enough money so UK viewers no longer have to pay.
Fine in theory, but the ROW could just use a VPN to pick a UK IP and watch it for nowt. In the same way that I do when I'm over seas and want to catch up on stuff.Most channels have a free trial for 7 days
PushedDover said:
Cobnapint said:
tobinen said:
I wonder if the BBC opened up to a subscription service for the ROW, it could bring in enough money so UK viewers no longer have to pay.
Fine in theory, but the ROW could just use a VPN to pick a UK IP and watch it for nowt. In the same way that I do when I'm over seas and want to catch up on stuff.There are loads of free ones on the Google Play Store.
On the panel: Thursday 27th
Edward Argar MP, health minister, Conservative;
Jon Ashworth MP, shadow health secretary, Labour;
John Bird, founder of The Big Issue and crossbench peer;
Alison Phillips, editor of the Daily Mirror newspaper;
Ayesha Vardag, celebrity divorce lawyer known for strengthening the status of prenuptial agreements in English law.
Edward Argar MP, health minister, Conservative;
Jon Ashworth MP, shadow health secretary, Labour;
John Bird, founder of The Big Issue and crossbench peer;
Alison Phillips, editor of the Daily Mirror newspaper;
Ayesha Vardag, celebrity divorce lawyer known for strengthening the status of prenuptial agreements in English law.
Cobnapint said:
PushedDover said:
Cobnapint said:
tobinen said:
I wonder if the BBC opened up to a subscription service for the ROW, it could bring in enough money so UK viewers no longer have to pay.
Fine in theory, but the ROW could just use a VPN to pick a UK IP and watch it for nowt. In the same way that I do when I'm over seas and want to catch up on stuff.There are loads of free ones on the Google Play Store.
Nothing good comes for free.
TPSA7514 said:
On the panel: Thursday 27th
Edward Argar MP, health minister, Conservative;
Jon Ashworth MP, shadow health secretary, Labour;
John Bird, founder of The Big Issue and crossbench peer;
Alison Phillips, editor of the Daily Mirror newspaper;
Ayesha Vardag, celebrity divorce lawyer known for strengthening the status of prenuptial agreements in English law.
What a terribly weak panel that is.Edward Argar MP, health minister, Conservative;
Jon Ashworth MP, shadow health secretary, Labour;
John Bird, founder of The Big Issue and crossbench peer;
Alison Phillips, editor of the Daily Mirror newspaper;
Ayesha Vardag, celebrity divorce lawyer known for strengthening the status of prenuptial agreements in English law.
markyb_lcy said:
Zahawi.... AGAIN?! Between him and Cleverly, that must be about 75% of all Tory representation on QT over the past year. Maybe a slight exaggeration on my part but it is getting boring.
Ashworth is too much of a regular too.
Yeah, same ole faces. But they've got the melons to show up, a lot run scared.Ashworth is too much of a regular too.
Halb said:
Yeah, same ole faces. But they've got the melons to show up, a lot run scared.
I’m interested in the selection process for the two main parties’ appearances. As in ... are they approached as individuals or do they apply to be on it, and to what degree are party leadership and in the case of the ruling party no10 involved in deciding who gets wheeled out.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff