Balanced Question Time panel tonight - of course not! Vol 3

Balanced Question Time panel tonight - of course not! Vol 3

Author
Discussion

markyb_lcy

9,904 posts

63 months

Thursday 29th October 2020
quotequote all
Tuna said:
markyb_lcy said:
What, you mean like the Tory supporters that have been frothing all day?
If your whole schtick is that you are lead by a higher moral purpose, and the other guys are corrupt and ruthless, it is rather noticeable if that commentary suddenly goes quiet.
Whose shtick is that they are led (not lead) by a higher moral purpose? Is that not the personal philosophy of any politician?

What exactly do you expect? We’ve had apologies, a suspension of the whip, and people accepting there was a problem and accepting the findings and recommendations of the report.

Get on your roof and scream if it makes you feel better. Go out into your community and strong arm members of the public into joining in.

See what it achieves. Nothing. Hot air.

What you’re basically butt-hurt about is that it’s not having as much of a negative effect on your political opponents as you’d hoped. I find that a bit sad.

Is it still virtue signalling when those on the right do this?

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Thursday 29th October 2020
quotequote all
markyb_lcy said:
Welshbeef said:
The clear labour voters in the zooms kind of discarded it /oh it’s history it’s changed already job done.

Now imagine if it was Tory party - labour voters would be screaming and frothing at the mouth (forever more)
What, you mean like the Tory supporters that have been frothing all day?

Frothing is just noise. It doesn’t achieve anything. That said, if you want to froth, froth, but don’t whinge because people who you think should froth aren’t doing. That’s dumb.
No what happens in times of trouble ie 1997-2008 running a huge deficit when we should have had a surplus then bang - oh it’s not labours fault people not having rides for years and years.... Um they already had received it the throttle back was to erode that over rate to realign.

Oh no look the anti racist party is a racist party just like BNP. But don’t worry it’s already sorted never need mention it again.


Oh torys gave millionaires the tax break 50% to 45% - oh yes the tax labour had only been in position for the last month of the parliament - but don’t forget you gave the poorest a tax rise from 10% to 20% that’s a nice progressive tax policy.

Oh look Blair gave away our EU rebate in the total belief EU would negotiate hahaha thanks for that tax rise labour.

Oh look Brown told the gold market & the whole media we U.K. were selling out gold. Oh st market price ranked on that as massive supply entered with advance notice costing us tax payers massive tax increases to fund the loss.

The list is endless but labour supporters oddly forget about all that and instead focus on the torys. Strange - if it’s a football game you’d criticise your own team where there are failures not criticise the other team who have beaten you.

markyb_lcy

9,904 posts

63 months

Thursday 29th October 2020
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
No what happens in times of trouble ie 1997-2008 running a huge deficit when we should have had a surplus then bang - oh it’s not labours fault people not having rides for years and years.... Um they already had received it the throttle back was to erode that over rate to realign.

Oh no look the anti racist party is a racist party just like BNP. But don’t worry it’s already sorted never need mention it again.


Oh torys gave millionaires the tax break 50% to 45% - oh yes the tax labour had only been in position for the last month of the parliament - but don’t forget you gave the poorest a tax rise from 10% to 20% that’s a nice progressive tax policy.

Oh look Blair gave away our EU rebate in the total belief EU would negotiate hahaha thanks for that tax rise labour.

Oh look Brown told the gold market & the whole media we U.K. were selling out gold. Oh st market price ranked on that as massive supply entered with advance notice costing us tax payers massive tax increases to fund the loss.

The list is endless but labour supporters oddly forget about all that and instead focus on the torys. Strange - if it’s a football game you’d criticise your own team where there are failures not criticise the other team who have beaten you.
Labour is not a “racist party”. Clearly there has been a problem with some antisemitism within the party. Firstly on the fringes, which because of inaction by the leadership at the time was able to associate itself with said leadership.

The conservatives are not a racist party either, despite the islamaphobia, and despite some members of the party (and other parties) themselves being racist.

As for the rest of your rant, I’m struggling to see what that has to do with the Labour Antisemitism scandal. You’ve basically proved exactly what I thought ... that your only interest in this is to give your political opponents a bloody nose. Well done you, what an admirable position to take.

Vanden Saab

14,118 posts

75 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
markyb_lcy said:
Labour is not a “racist party”. Clearly there has been a problem with some antisemitism within the party. Firstly on the fringes, which because of inaction by the leadership at the time was able to associate itself with said leadership.

The conservatives are not a racist party either, despite the islamaphobia, and despite some members of the party (and other parties) themselves being racist.

As for the rest of your rant, I’m struggling to see what that has to do with the Labour Antisemitism scandal. You’ve basically proved exactly what I thought ... that your only interest in this is to give your political opponents a bloody nose. Well done you, what an admirable position to take.
Better hand your membership card in before you get kicked out.
Guardian said:
The debate is over. Under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, the Labour party became institutionally anti-Semitic
That is racist by the way in case you think anti-Semitism is 'not the same' as racism

Ridgemont

6,587 posts

132 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
Tuna said:
No-one is holier than Greer...
Germaine would like a word. Armed with a high heel.

Ridgemont

6,587 posts

132 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
markyb_lcy said:
Labour is not a “racist party”. Clearly there has been a problem with some antisemitism within the party. Firstly on the fringes, which because of inaction by the leadership at the time was able to associate itself with said leadership.
Not going to comment on the bit I cut: there are without doubt racist tories (though Johnson, too clever by half, gets a bum rap on that one).

The Quote above though is absolute balderdash.

‘Some within the party’?
What is your definition of racism?
1) Some gammon spouting anti immigrant nonsense?
Or
2) is it the adoption of policies and discourse which are anti Semitic?
If you tick both you may pat yourself on the back but I doubt you did.

markyb_lcy

9,904 posts

63 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
Vanden Saab said:
markyb_lcy said:
Labour is not a “racist party”. Clearly there has been a problem with some antisemitism within the party. Firstly on the fringes, which because of inaction by the leadership at the time was able to associate itself with said leadership.

The conservatives are not a racist party either, despite the islamaphobia, and despite some members of the party (and other parties) themselves being racist.

As for the rest of your rant, I’m struggling to see what that has to do with the Labour Antisemitism scandal. You’ve basically proved exactly what I thought ... that your only interest in this is to give your political opponents a bloody nose. Well done you, what an admirable position to take.
Better hand your membership card in before you get kicked out.
Guardian said:
The debate is over. Under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, the Labour party became institutionally anti-Semitic
That is racist by the way in case you think anti-Semitism is 'not the same' as racism
Oh, the Guardian said it, so it must be true.

markyb_lcy

9,904 posts

63 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
markyb_lcy said:
Labour is not a “racist party”. Clearly there has been a problem with some antisemitism within the party. Firstly on the fringes, which because of inaction by the leadership at the time was able to associate itself with said leadership.
Not going to comment on the bit I cut: there are without doubt racist tories (though Johnson, too clever by half, gets a bum rap on that one).

The Quote above though is absolute balderdash.

‘Some within the party’?
What is your definition of racism?
1) Some gammon spouting anti immigrant nonsense?
Or
2) is it the adoption of policies and discourse which are anti Semitic?
If you tick both you may pat yourself on the back but I doubt you did.
I’m not sure what you’re getting at here.

Being against immigration or wanting control of immigration does not a racist make. There are both anti-immigration proponents and racists in both major parties. As members, and far more likely as voters.

Having some members (or voters) of a political party that are themselves racist, does not a racist party make.

By the way, while we are here, maybe you can point out the policies (previous or current leadership) of the Labour Party that you assert to be antisemitic policies.

Ridgemont

6,587 posts

132 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
markyb_lcy said:
Ridgemont said:
markyb_lcy said:
Labour is not a “racist party”. Clearly there has been a problem with some antisemitism within the party. Firstly on the fringes, which because of inaction by the leadership at the time was able to associate itself with said leadership.
Not going to comment on the bit I cut: there are without doubt racist tories (though Johnson, too clever by half, gets a bum rap on that one).

The Quote above though is absolute balderdash.

‘Some within the party’?
What is your definition of racism?
1) Some gammon spouting anti immigrant nonsense?
Or
2) is it the adoption of policies and discourse which are anti Semitic?
If you tick both you may pat yourself on the back but I doubt you did.
I’m not sure what you’re getting at here.

Being against immigration or wanting control of immigration does not a racist make. There are both anti-immigration proponents and racists in both major parties. As members, and far more likely as voters.

Having some members (or voters) of a a political party that are themselves racist, does not a racist party make.

By the way, while we are here, maybe you can point out the policies (previous or current leadership) of the Labour Party that you assert to be antisemitic policies.
The policy to refuse to adopt the IHRA Definitions around antisemitism for a start.

Ridgemont

6,587 posts

132 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
markyb_lcy said:
Ridgemont said:
markyb_lcy said:
Labour is not a “racist party”. Clearly there has been a problem with some antisemitism within the party. Firstly on the fringes, which because of inaction by the leadership at the time was able to associate itself with said leadership.
Not going to comment on the bit I cut: there are without doubt racist tories (though Johnson, too clever by half, gets a bum rap on that one).

The Quote above though is absolute balderdash.

‘Some within the party’?
What is your definition of racism?
1) Some gammon spouting anti immigrant nonsense?
Or
2) is it the adoption of policies and discourse which are anti Semitic?
If you tick both you may pat yourself on the back but I doubt you did.
I’m not sure what you’re getting at here.

Being against immigration or wanting control of immigration does not a racist make. There are both anti-immigration proponents and racists in both major parties. As members, and far more likely as voters.

Having some members (or voters) of a a political party that are themselves racist, does not a racist party make.

By the way, while we are here, maybe you can point out the policies (previous or current leadership) of the Labour Party that you assert to be antisemitic policies.
The policy to refuse to adopt the IHRA Definitions around antisemitism for a start.
And ‘by the way’ that is absolutely fking core to the clusterfk that Corbyn led labour found themselves in.
By the way... right.

markyb_lcy

9,904 posts

63 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
The policy to refuse to adopt the IHRA Definitions around antisemitism for a start.
That’s not a policy, it’s a decision. Perhaps a bad one, but in my opinion not necessarily a racist one in and of itself.

You are free to believe otherwise, as is anybody else.

Ridgemont

6,587 posts

132 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
markyb_lcy said:
Ridgemont said:
The policy to refuse to adopt the IHRA Definitions around antisemitism for a start.
That’s not a policy, it’s a decision. Perhaps a bad one, but in my opinion not necessarily a racist one in and of itself.

You are free to believe otherwise, as is anybody else.
Er... how is it not a policy?

It’s a political stance. It’s one that the NEC endorsed.
That Corbyn reinforced?
That many candidates actually (amazingly) stood on.

It’s in NEC minutes.

It hilariously (unless I missed it) didn’t appear in the manifesto in 2019 but I go back to my opinion that that makes Corbyn an obsfucating nutwad garden Gnome.

But it was a ‘decision’ ‘policy’ or whatever that his breed of labour is currently and deservedly being nailed to cross on.

Jesus. ‘Policy’.

Ridgemont

6,587 posts

132 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
That all ranted. It’s the question time thread. I’ll pipe down now. Gave up after 5 mins.

Need a new presenter.

markyb_lcy

9,904 posts

63 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
markyb_lcy said:
Ridgemont said:
The policy to refuse to adopt the IHRA Definitions around antisemitism for a start.
That’s not a policy, it’s a decision. Perhaps a bad one, but in my opinion not necessarily a racist one in and of itself.

You are free to believe otherwise, as is anybody else.
Er... how is it not a policy?

It’s a political stance. It’s one that the NEC endorsed.
That Corbyn reinforced?
That many candidates actually (amazingly) stood on.

It’s in NEC minutes.

It hilariously (unless I missed it) didn’t appear in the manifesto in 2019 but I go back to my opinion that that makes Corbyn an obsfucating nutwad garden Gnome.

But it was a ‘decision’ ‘policy’ or whatever that his breed of labour is currently and deservedly being nailed to cross on.

Jesus. ‘Policy’.
Listen, I’ve no love for JC, let’s get that straight. And there was clearly a problem with some elements of the party that were racist. JC and his inner circle didn’t deal with the problem presumably because they saw it as partly politically motivated (wrongly) and also because they didn’t want to admit the problem exists and deal with the fallout. Heads in the sand. That was wrong, and the ringleaders of that deserve all the criticism they get. I stop short of calling them racists, because I don’t believe that they were. The racists were members and supporters on the fringes of the party.

Further, to assert that the Labour Party is a “racist party” is a massive over-exaggeration and pure political opportunism.

I’m going to leave it at that.


Edited by markyb_lcy on Friday 30th October 01:03

markyb_lcy

9,904 posts

63 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
That all ranted. It’s the question time thread. I’ll pipe down now. Gave up after 5 mins.

Need a new presenter.
Agree. It was worth it for the mooch but that was about it.

anonymoususer

5,828 posts

49 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
I will just say that the comments tonight by the few who still bother have been so much better, politer and respectful of each other than recent weeks
Well done
It is pretty vile to see posters tearing each other apart in their certainty that they are cleverer, better than their opponent

Ridgemont

6,587 posts

132 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
anonymoususer said:
I will just say that the comments tonight by the few who still bother have been so much better, politer and respectful of each other than recent weeks
Well done
It is pretty vile to see posters tearing each other apart in their certainty that they are cleverer, better than their opponent
Is that you Dave? smile. angel

sparkythecat

7,903 posts

256 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
markyb_lcy said:
Tuna said:
markyb_lcy said:
What, you mean like the Tory supporters that have been frothing all day?
If your whole schtick is that you are lead by a higher moral purpose, and the other guys are corrupt and ruthless, it is rather noticeable if that commentary suddenly goes quiet.
Whose shtick is that they are led (not lead) by a higher moral purpose? Is that not the personal philosophy of any politician?...
Picture of man with shtick.



Murph7355

37,750 posts

257 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
anonymoususer said:
...

Meanwhile over on the Drama Channel Spooks is showing the 2nd episode of series 5 in which the team try to stop a far right faction from taking over the UK government its the one that introduces Hermione Norris as Ros Myers and joll;y good it is too

...
I keep forgetting QT is on these days, thankfully.

I watched Sicario again as it's far more upbeat.

QT's sunk without trace IMO. Fiona Bruce was a big mistake. She put the final nail in the coffin of the original format and the Covid aware one is worse. BBC should just shoot it in the head.


cuprabob

14,657 posts

215 months

Friday 30th October 2020
quotequote all
I like Fiona Bruce but sadly she's not suited to QT in my opinion.