Harry and Meghan

Author
Discussion

Captain Smerc

3,029 posts

117 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
yonex said:
smn159 said:
roflbeer
clap

MC Bodge

21,728 posts

176 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
IanJ9375 said:
Disastrous said:
I suspect age plays a large part in the anger.

In the younger generations the following is true:

Nobody really cares for the values Rod Liddle espouses as being ‘British’ (thank God) any more.

Nobody cares much about what the Royals do or don’t do.

People DO care about the environment and don’t believe climate change deniers.

They also care about their fellow man and will seek to put human rights over economics.

What makes the gammons angry is that they know this deep down, and that in just a generation or two, everything they’re cross about (Europe, Political Correctness, Woke culture, gender fluidity, the Royals etc) will all be reset as if they’d never been there.

All the things they’ve bayed and howled over will be forgotten as time rolls on and the things they like will be consigned to history.

It’s that really, isn’t it?
Probably for the most part quite accurate - add in the likelihood that Tabloids will be gone so less skewing of opinions as well.
Although social media and convincing, misleading news may well be more pervasive.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
Dont like rolls said:
Doesn't look much like Chipping Norton to me?

Dont like rolls

3,798 posts

55 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
yonex said:
Doesn't look much like Chipping Norton to me?
"Cotswolds"


anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
Dont like rolls said:
"Cotswolds"
Yes, in the Cotswolds. What are you struggling with now, i'm here to help.

Dont like rolls

3,798 posts

55 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
yonex said:
Yes, in the Cotswolds. What are you struggling with now, i'm here to help.
That was in the Cotswolds, the Cotswolds are not just Chipping Norton which I add, you did not mention. Me struggle, naaaa guv.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
Dont like rolls said:
That was in the Cotswolds, the Cotswolds are not just Chipping Norton which I add, you did not mention. Me struggle, naaaa guv.
But they are. You don't come from 'round 'ere.

Burwood

18,709 posts

247 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
Will be see Harry being a brand ambassador. Good luck to him.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
Burwood said:
Will be see Harry being a brand ambassador. Good luck to him.
Exactly, his earning potential is almost limitless.

Dont like rolls

3,798 posts

55 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
yonex said:
But they are. You don't come from 'round 'ere.
What are ?

And I do, but very recently moved.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
Dont like rolls said:
What are ?

And I do, but very recently moved.
The future’s bright for everyone smile

So, Queenie is happy, Meghan and Harry with huge commercial value are happy, Piers Morgan is unhappy.

Therefore, all is good, /thread biggrin

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
They could take a leaf out of Uncle Andrews ideas

They would need to buy and build or renovate a large stately looking place. The renovation building could be sold to a TV company for a series something like hey we built a palace
Once opened they could employ a licensed person who was licensed to do weddings. Perhaps Harry could train up to be one
They wouldn't have to be there every time. Like when they were around you could eat at one of Jamie Olivers restaurants but it wouldn't mean he would be there himself
Once that's all in place they could launch the new business
Hitch at the Palace

Dont like rolls

3,798 posts

55 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
techiedave said:
They could take a leaf out of Uncle Andrews ideas

They would need to buy and build or renovate a large stately looking place. The renovation building could be sold to a TV company for a series something like hey we built a palace
Once opened they could employ a licensed person who was licensed to do weddings. Perhaps Harry could train up to be one
They wouldn't have to be there every time. Like when they were around you could eat at one of Jamie Olivers restaurants but it wouldn't mean he would be there himself
Once that's all in place they could launch the new business
Hitch at the Palace
Or Hookers ?

Humping @ Harry's and Muffs @ Meg's ?

Stussy

1,873 posts

65 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
Then it all goes wrong like Jamie Oliver’s restaurants?

Mojooo

12,771 posts

181 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
I feel sorry for Will, I bet he has also wanted to jack it in at times, but its impossible for him to do so.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Sunday 19th January 2020
quotequote all
smn159 said:
Pesty said:
No idea what that is but they, the young uns that is ( around these parts sample of two) seem to like them like they are cardasians or something. I.e they are on telly a lot, good looking and have flash life styles on yachts.
smile

You know I believe one should never be proud of ignorance. I am aware that there are some people with names that sound like how I spelled it. I’ve seen clips of them a couple of times and that’s it.

THis one time while not proud of being ignorant about them I happy that is as much as I know.

PH_77

1,315 posts

94 months

Monday 20th January 2020
quotequote all
A great speech, by Meghan and her astute PR gang:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51170973

unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Monday 20th January 2020
quotequote all


That speech confirms once and for all what has been apparent over a number of days now:

. . . a) This matter was fully known and discussed within the royal family for months on end.

. . . b) The social media announcement that precipitated the public brouhaha was a bid by Meghan and Harry to look the leaders in all this. To essentially trump the Queen (and to me, this seems petulant and manipulative).

. . . c) Ditto the rude decision to leave one's other half an ocean away -- to negotiate on his own a close to the failed agreement.

It's a loss for all, actually. Just when a post-Brexit Britain could use a bit of transatlantic mojo to help with the contracts and trade deals that will take months and years to cultivate... there is but an extinguished lamp.

In this respect, Harry's greatest value, arguably, was as a sort of insider. This doesn't mean that Harry has no value without such status. But it does take away a certain implied leverage.

Some here have said that Harry now hasn't a leg to stand on, and I'm afraid I can't readily disagree with that.



Gromm

890 posts

58 months

Monday 20th January 2020
quotequote all
So when is notsomuchofaprincess will be selling access to Harry and how much will be the going rate I wonder? Heh.

Ridgemont

6,609 posts

132 months

Monday 20th January 2020
quotequote all
unsprung said:
That speech confirms once and for all what has been apparent over a number of days now:

. . . a) This matter was fully known and discussed within the royal family for months on end.

. . . b) The social media announcement that precipitated the public brouhaha was a bid by Meghan and Harry to look the leaders in all this. To essentially trump the Queen (and to me, this seems petulant and manipulative).

. . . c) Ditto the rude decision to leave one's other half an ocean away -- to negotiate on his own a close to the failed agreement.

It's a loss for all, actually. Just when a post-Brexit Britain could use a bit of transatlantic mojo to help with the contracts and trade deals that will take months and years to cultivate... there is but an extinguished lamp.

In this respect, Harry's greatest value, arguably, was as a sort of insider. This doesn't mean that Harry has no value without such status. But it does take away a certain implied leverage.

Some here have said that Harry now hasn't a leg to stand on, and I'm afraid I can't readily disagree with that.
It is an odd speech in some respects: he acknowledged the Hoo ha. He clearly isn’t confused about the broader arguments around his role. He’s decided to take the change of status on the chin.
Which is all well and good.
But I don’t quite get a sense of someone who realised he has essentially cut himself off from the life he had. Stuff will be carrying on the same but different.
I don’t think so.