Harry and Meghan

[DeepEnd]

One of the curious things about this issue is the complete blindness of the frothy Meghan bashers to those who have no particular issue with her or what she does.

They don’t see that their own behaviour is completely on display, exposing feelings approaching hatred for someone they have never met and in all likelihood is based on the rantings of the DM or Farage towards Harry and Meghan. Well let’s face it Meghan.

[loafer123]

[Legacywr]

DeepEnd said:

One of the curious things about this issue is the complete blindness of the frothy Meghan bashers to those who have no particular issue with her or what she does.

That doesn’t make any sense?

[Sway]

Legacywr said:

DeepEnd said:

One of the curious things about this issue is the complete blindness of the frothy Meghan bashers to those who have no particular issue with her or what she does.

That doesn’t make any sense?

It's DE. It's very easy to translate any of his posts.

They all come down to his belief that he's better than most, and most are racist and sexist (but mainly racist). Therefore, anything he sees that disagrees with his belief only reinforces the view that others are racist and beneath him.

[Some Gump]

Is it me or do the 2 of them not just need to stfu and get on with life? so you've not got on well with the in laws? Wow fk me that's unique. Just avoid them and be polite at christmas and birthdays like the rest of us.

Also, has anyone called piers morgan a on this thread? I was just checking becuase this whole saga has once again reconfirmed piers morgan as a and piers morgan would probably be very upset if we didnt mention him.

[DeepEnd]

Legacywr said:

DeepEnd said:

One of the curious things about this issue is the complete blindness of the frothy Meghan bashers to those who have no particular issue with her or what she does.

That doesn’t make any sense?

It is what it is.

The ranting and frothing at Meghan is far more cringe, embarrassing and in some cases vile than anything H&M have ever done.

Those doing it can’t see that. Hence blind.

[NikBartlett]

I'm waiting for the summer invitation to Paris to meet up with Prince Andrew and a one way trip along the Parisian underpasses

[smn159]

NikBartlett said:

I'm waiting for the summer invitation to Paris to meet up with Prince Andrew and a one way trip along the Parisian underpasses

Does he even know you?

[98elise]

p1stonhead said:

MrJuice said:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/05/ma...

Brilliant.

Rather than hiding it on the back pages in tiny font.

I've always thought this should be the case. If you have to retract or correct a story then it should be given the same prominence as the original story.

Papers will then be a little more careful about what they print, and make sure it's accurate.

[Randy Winkman]

BroadsRS6 said:

Let's cut to the chase.
Markle was only ever after the mega money, fame, attention that marrying a Royal would bring. She never wanted the work that goes with it or to give up the time that involves. She was never going to handle the restrictions that come with Royal life. She just wanted all the good bits. Then got out the pathetic and desperately over-used race card to further her whining.
From day ONE virtually she wanted Harry to be her Hollywood puppet. She was always going to move him to LA which is what i predicted from the start. She is a control freak and an arrogant self-pitying fake. A wannabe neverwillbe.
He spends his life looking like a rabbit in the headlights, forever in her slipstream with her making all the decisions and him falling quietly in line.
She will tomorrow launch her latest and greatest attack on our Royals and should be completely shunned by them from now on and stripped of everything connected with our Royal family.
Duchess? DO me a favour. Self-pitying arrogant puppet master.

When you started with "Let's cut to the chase" I assumed you were going to give us some sort of balanced overview of the situation. Then you just had a rant. Have you thought of changing your username to "The Voice of Reason" or something corny like that?

[Some Gump]

Randy Winkman said:

When you started with "Let's cut to the chase" I assumed you were going to give us some sort of balanced overview of the situation. Then you just had a rant. Have you thought of changing your username to "The Voice of Reason" or something corny like that?

Based on the assumption that anyone who can write a rant like that about the personality traits of someone he has never met, who is in an environment he's never experienced, i reckon not..

[JagLover]

Some Gump said:

Is it me or do the 2 of them not just need to stfu and get on with life? so you've not got on well with the in laws? Wow fk me that's unique. Just avoid them and be polite at christmas and birthdays like the rest of us.

Also, has anyone called piers morgan a on this thread? I was just checking becuase this whole saga has once again reconfirmed piers morgan as a and piers morgan would probably be very upset if we didnt mention him.

Well, whatever the subject, Piers Morgan can usually be relied upon to be a Tw*t

[anonymous-user]

Some Gump said:

Based on the assumption that anyone who can write a rant like that about the personality traits of someone he has never met, who is in an environment he's never experienced, i reckon not..

So many have prejudged her and written her off. I honestly don't know why, she hasn't really done much to cause such ire.

[MrJuice]

The Spruce Goose said:

So many have prejudged her and written her off. I honestly don't know why, she hasn't really done much to cause such ire.

I think this great nation is not short of people who formed their opinion of MM on seeing a pic of her for the first time. She does not fit the "person spec" for member of English Royal family very well.

[bitchstewie]

MrJuice said:

I think this great nation is not short of people who formed their opinion of MM on seeing a pic of her for the first time. She does not fit the "person spec" for member of English Royal family very well.

Hmm

• American
• Successful
• Divorced
• Black
• Female
• Has opinions of her own

To be fair one of those is probably a pre-requisite for marrying Harry but can't possibly think why large sections of PistonHeads would struggle with some of those other ones

[DeepEnd]

bhstewie said:

Hmm

• American
• Successful
• Divorced
• Black
• Female
• Has opinions of her own

To be fair one of those is probably a pre-requisite for marrying Harry but can't possibly think why large sections of PistonHeads would struggle with some of those other ones

In their own minds I'm sure they have "legitimate concerns" - that they formed all by themselves of course.

[Sway]

bhstewie said:

MrJuice said:

I think this great nation is not short of people who formed their opinion of MM on seeing a pic of her for the first time. She does not fit the "person spec" for member of English Royal family very well.

Hmm

• American
• Successful
• Divorced
• Black
• Female
• Has opinions of her own

To be fair one of those is probably a pre-requisite for marrying Harry but can't possibly think why large sections of PistonHeads would struggle with some of those other ones

Do you really think, reading the criticisms of the pair, that "large sections of pistonheads" are only putting forwards those arguments due to them being sexist and racist?

If you genuinely think so many PHers are like that - why on earth do you come here? I certainly wouldn't choose to frequent a pub full of sexist and racists...

[popeyewhite]

The Spruce Goose said:

So many have prejudged her and written her off. I honestly don't know why, she hasn't really done much to cause such ire.

And we have no way of knowing anything like the truth anyway as all we get is drip fed media nonsense. TBH I think at the worst they have both been slightly disrespectful to H's Grandma.

MrJuice said:

I think this great nation is not short of people who formed their opinion of MM on seeing a pic of her for the first time. She does not fit the "person spec" for member of English Royal family very well.

I've seen no proof of this whatsoever, but it's another narrative fed by sections of the media (often foreign), pro H+M this time. I believe the British people are mostly pretty decent and want only the best for Harry. Anyone duped into following the racism theme is just as gullible as anyone who believes M is some kind of Machiavellian plotter with a long term hidden agenda.

[bitchstewie]

Sway said:

Do you really think, reading the criticisms of the pair, that "large sections of pistonheads" are only putting forwards those arguments due to them being sexist and racist?

If you genuinely think so many PHers are like that - why on earth do you come here? I certainly wouldn't choose to frequent a pub full of sexist and racists...

Because it's funny seeing how ignorant people are.

You're a clever bloke Sway yet here you are bought into it hook line and sinker and all because the Daily Mail told you to dislike someone you know next to nothing about.

Maybe aim some of that bile at the likes of the Mail and ask how they did it to you instead of believing it.

[JagLover]

Sway said:

Do you really think, reading the criticisms of the pair, that "large sections of pistonheads" are only putting forwards those arguments due to them being sexist and racist?

If you genuinely think so many PHers are like that - why on earth do you come here? I certainly wouldn't choose to frequent a pub full of sexist and racists...

But what if you could smugly proclaim to the pub patrons how superior you are to them every time you went?. Surely you would be going then?