Harry and Meghan

[hyphen]

DeepEnd said:

Well they rehashed it - just as you have done here.

So I'll judge you both still, thanks.

Username checks out.

[bitchstewie]

https://twitter.com/Coldwar_Steve/status/123747923...

[105.4]

bhstewie said:

(the paragraph above isn’t directed at you personally, so please don’t take it that way either).

No worries Stewie

I’m afraid I’m going to bow out of answering your questions. No disrespect mate, but this thread is starting to make my head hurt.

[DeepEnd]

Sarah Vine in 4 pictures:

https://twitter.com/JimMFelton/status/136819404701...

Niggling doubt eh Sarah. Nod nod wink wink.

What a terrible excuse for a human being.

[anonymous-user]

Anyone that can get a rag paper to publish an apology on the front page has my utmost respect and admiration.

Here’s to this happening more often to these toilet papers.

[anonymoususer]

DeepEnd said:

hyphen said:

As the article in the Mail says, it's not their story. They have just read it on the Telegraph and are rehashing it. So all your hate to the DM on this occasion is wrongly directed.

Well they rehashed it - just as you have done here.

So I'll judge you both still, thanks.

Strong is the man who can judge another
Embrace your strength and appreciate that many of us look up to you

[DeepEnd]

anonymoususer said:

DeepEnd said:

hyphen said:

As the article in the Mail says, it's not their story. They have just read it on the Telegraph and are rehashing it. So all your hate to the DM on this occasion is wrongly directed.

Well they rehashed it - just as you have done here.

So I'll judge you both still, thanks.

Strong is the man who can judge another
Embrace your strength and appreciate that many of us look up to you

I wouldn't normally judge but when it comes to grown men wailing about Greta or Meghan there is usually no need to post a question on AITA/Reddit.

[Randy Winkman]

Iwantafusca said:

Anyone that can get a rag paper to publish an apology on the front page has my utmost respect and admiration.

Here’s to this happening more often to these toilet papers.

[anonymous-user]

Iwantafusca said:

Anyone that can get a rag paper to publish an apology on the front page has my utmost respect and admiration.

Here’s to this happening more often to these toilet papers.

i think that is the reason they moved abroad, as knew if they won, the papers would be coming back harder,

[hyphen]

The Spruce Goose said:

i think that is the reason they moved abroad, as knew if they won, the papers would be coming back harder,

Dailymail.com is the US version of Dailymail.co.uk. It gets around 85 million unique hits in the USA per month which puts it on par with New York Times.

If they want to escape the mail, Harry needs to move his family to rural Africa, not LA

By making themselves bigger names in the USA via these interviews, Mail USA will have a stronger business case to spend more of its budget on them.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/daily-mails-online-re...

Edited by hyphen on Saturday 6th March 22:10

[Mr Tidy]

There are far too many pages here for me to have read them all, but surely Meghan should have done some research?

They (she) distanced from the Royal Family but then they (she) seems keen to slag it off for some free publicity, although we'll remember the RF much longer than we remember the Markles - although we may recall when Harry lost his balls.

[PH_77]

Mr Tidy said:

There are far too many pages here for me to have read them all, but surely Meghan should have done some research?

They (she) distanced from the Royal Family but then they (she) seems keen to slag it off for some free publicity, although we'll remember the RF much longer than we remember the Markles - although we may recall when Harry lost his balls.

She clearly wanted to reach the highest echelons of society to show the world how virtuous she was. Meeting Harry was every hopeful princess's dream. Albeit 100% orchestrated. Unfortunately the world doesn't really care about random slappers. I'd always be wary of anyone who'll get naked and will fk or pretend to fk, or do a suck job for money, whilst knowingly being filmed.

[BroadsRS6]

PH_77 said:

Mr Tidy said:

There are far too many pages here for me to have read them all, but surely Meghan should have done some research?

They (she) distanced from the Royal Family but then they (she) seems keen to slag it off for some free publicity, although we'll remember the RF much longer than we remember the Markles - although we may recall when Harry lost his balls.

She clearly wanted to reach the highest echelons of society to show the world how virtuous she was. Meeting Harry was every hopeful princess's dream. Albeit 100% orchestrated. Unfortunately the world doesn't really care about random slappers. I'd always be wary of anyone who'll get naked and will fk or pretend to fk, or do a suck job for money, whilst knowingly being filmed.

Yep.
She's a failed actress, a drama queen, someone desperate for fame and fortune, has Harry on puppet strings 24/7, has no morals whatsoever worth having and would be doing all this self-pity for free, not to date around $150 MILLION, if it was really about justice of some sort. She's a fake and pathetic.
The woman is an ugly control freak and i hope after today she is completely cut off by the Royals, as she is about as much use to our Queen as diesel in a Mclaren 720S.

[bitchstewie]

Can't think why I said what I did about attitudes towards women here

"random slappers."

"I'd always be wary of anyone who'll get naked and will fk or pretend to fk, or do a suck job for money, whilst knowingly being filmed"

"someone desperate for fame and fortune"

"has Harry on puppet strings 24/7"

"has no morals whatsoever worth having"

"The woman is an ugly control freak"

Lovely isn't it.

[Munter]

All I ever see or hear of them, is the couple in question releasing statements complaining about the press, in the press.

That's it. Now "Oprah".

It's not how to live the quiet life. Something about rod and own back is really starting to form in my mind.

[Sway]

bhstewie said:

Can't think why I said what I did about attitudes towards women here

"random slappers."

"I'd always be wary of anyone who'll get naked and will fk or pretend to fk, or do a suck job for money, whilst knowingly being filmed"

"someone desperate for fame and fortune"

"has Harry on puppet strings 24/7"

"has no morals whatsoever worth having"

"The woman is an ugly control freak"

Lovely isn't it.

.

No, it's not. But...

Two of those quotes relate to gender.

One of those isn't biased against either gender, but merely refers to hers.

Why try to make the issue larger than our is by bringing in things completely irrelevant to mysogyny?

Edited by Sway on Sunday 7th March 07:57

[DeepEnd]

bhstewie said:

Can't think why I said what I did about attitudes towards women here

"random slappers."

"I'd always be wary of anyone who'll get naked and will fk or pretend to fk, or do a suck job for money, whilst knowingly being filmed"

"someone desperate for fame and fortune"

"has Harry on puppet strings 24/7"

"has no morals whatsoever worth having"

"The woman is an ugly control freak"

Lovely isn't it.

It is staggering to read really.

I wonder if some of these posters have gf/wives, and if they talk like this with them, or in public?

Perhaps some are just angry incels alone at their keyboard, wondering why they can’t get / keep a gf. That is not all of them though it seems.

I find the Royal Family response perplexing. There is something very odd and out of touch about their moves here - this counter broadcast seems like it could be spectacularly misjudged - like Andrew with Emily M on Newsnight.

[valiant]

Some of the most recent comments on here about a woman you don’t know except through the media are absolutely terrible.

Why is that? Do you hate women in general or is it because she’s threatening your beloved royal institution?

Some posters need to step back a touch and think before they hit the submit button.

[bitchstewie]

Sway said:

Two of those quotes relate to gender.

One of those isn't biased against either gender, but merely refers to hers.

Why try to make the issue larger than our is by bringing in things completely irrelevant to mysogyny?

Like I suggested yesterday perhaps spend a little time asking the people posting such things why they feel the need to speak about someone they don't know like that rather than counting the insults and splitting them into categories to try to make some of it sound like it's actually not so bad.

That shouldn't be too difficult.

Should it?

[768]

Munter said:

All I ever see or hear of them, is the couple in question releasing statements complaining about the press, in the press.

That's it. Now "Oprah".

It's not how to live the quiet life. Something about rod and own back is really starting to form in my mind.

I can't think for a second they're actually after the quiet life, you just wouldn't behave like they do. Complaining about the press to the press in front of TV cameras on an open top bus is how they drum up business. It's as obvious an act as Joey Essex pretending to be monumentally thick and people flock to the absurdity of it.