Harry and Meghan

[Randy Winkman]

smn159 said:

bhstewie said:

Can't think why I said what I did about attitudes towards women here

"random slappers."

"I'd always be wary of anyone who'll get naked and will fk or pretend to fk, or do a suck job for money, whilst knowingly being filmed"

"someone desperate for fame and fortune"

"has Harry on puppet strings 24/7"

"has no morals whatsoever worth having"

"The woman is an ugly control freak"

Lovely isn't it.

There are some really unpleasant people on here

It's a classic, even by PH standards. Though I do appreciate that PH standards are by no means bad compared with some.

Edited to acknowledge the point that even when certain views can seem prevalent on a thread it's still probably the case that it's just a few vociferous people.

Edited by Randy Winkman on Sunday 7th March 08:54

[anonymous-user]

Sway said:

People who are fanatics (whether that be Meghan, Brexit or indeed militant vegans or carnivores) can't be reasoned with - they simply get ignored.

Those who aren't fanatics have some hope - hence I'll engage with them.

I've never claimed to be an expert in Meghan (or Harry) - but they do put out a hell of a lot of content to critique.

Sex tape was on pronhub. Not my most difficult wk.

Something very wrong with you.

One minute you’re frothing about Markle and next you’re going on about jerking off about her.

[DeepEnd]

smn159 said:

bhstewie said:

Can't think why I said what I did about attitudes towards women here

"random slappers."

"I'd always be wary of anyone who'll get naked and will fk or pretend to fk, or do a suck job for money, whilst knowingly being filmed"

"someone desperate for fame and fortune"

"has Harry on puppet strings 24/7"

"has no morals whatsoever worth having"

"The woman is an ugly control freak"

Lovely isn't it.

There are some really unpleasant people on here

And they seem to think they are in the majority, which is worrying and depressing.

The obsession by some fanatics to fish around for any old dirt on Meghan, and believe it seems & get taken in by (get off on!) deep fake videos is just sad.

The coldwar steve photo with Piers Morgan in his Meghan shrine where he can “worship” her has been given new relevance this morning!

[Sway]

El stovey said:

Sway said:

People who are fanatics (whether that be Meghan, Brexit or indeed militant vegans or carnivores) can't be reasoned with - they simply get ignored.

Those who aren't fanatics have some hope - hence I'll engage with them.

I've never claimed to be an expert in Meghan (or Harry) - but they do put out a hell of a lot of content to critique.

Sex tape was on pronhub. Not my most difficult wk.

Something very wrong with you.

One minute you’re frothing about Markle and next you’re going on about jerking off about her.

The vid came out years ago - pre-Harry. At the time, she was just a fairly hot actress.

Not sure pointing out the couple's hypocrisy (and indeed most of my criticism has been for Harry, not Megan) - or pointing out she's known as a ruthless social climber - is frothing.

[bitchstewie]

Sway said:

People who are fanatics (whether that be Meghan, Brexit or indeed militant vegans or carnivores) can't be reasoned with - they simply get ignored.

Those who aren't fanatics have some hope - hence I'll engage with them.

I've never claimed to be an expert in Meghan (or Harry) - but they do put out a hell of a lot of content to critique.

Sex tape was on pronhub. Not my most difficult wk.

Bloke who isn't an expert on Meghan Markle and definitely isn't influenced by what he sees in the media randomly types "Meghan Markle" into Pornhub.

Sounds legit.

[Randy Winkman]

DeepEnd said:

smn159 said:

bhstewie said:

Can't think why I said what I did about attitudes towards women here

"random slappers."

"I'd always be wary of anyone who'll get naked and will fk or pretend to fk, or do a suck job for money, whilst knowingly being filmed"

"someone desperate for fame and fortune"

"has Harry on puppet strings 24/7"

"has no morals whatsoever worth having"

"The woman is an ugly control freak"

Lovely isn't it.

There are some really unpleasant people on here

And they seem to think they are in the majority, which is worrying and depressing.

The obsession by some fanatics to fish around for any old dirt on Meghan, and believe it seems & get taken in by (get off on!) deep fake videos is just sad.

The coldwar steve photo with Piers Morgan in his Meghan shrine where he can “worship” her has been given new relevance this morning!

It's not reserved for bits of the internet though. It's been commonplace in the last couple of weeks for the Daily Mail to have the front page and then the next 4 or even 6 pages devoted entirely to telling us how terrible she is. It's on another level.

[Sway]

bhstewie said:

Sway said:

People who are fanatics (whether that be Meghan, Brexit or indeed militant vegans or carnivores) can't be reasoned with - they simply get ignored.

Those who aren't fanatics have some hope - hence I'll engage with them.

I've never claimed to be an expert in Meghan (or Harry) - but they do put out a hell of a lot of content to critique.

Sex tape was on pronhub. Not my most difficult wk.

Bloke who isn't an expert on Meghan Markle and definitely isn't influenced by what he sees in the media randomly types "Meghan Markle" into Pornhub.

Sounds legit.

Er, you are aware there's a homepage?

But you're really not trying to imply I'm obsessed with Markle, or indeed racist/ mysogynist...

[bitchstewie]

DeepEnd said:

The obsession by some fanatics to fish around for any old dirt on Meghan, and believe it seems & get taken in by (get off on!) deep fake videos is just sad.

Literally no idea what the tape is but on the deep fake video thing this is off-topic but worth a watch.

'I don't want to upset people': Tom Cruise deepfake creator speaks out

I literally had to watch that a few times and read the article several times to be sure that definitely wasn't actually him.

Terrifying if that's what's on the horizon.

[anonymous-user]

Sway said:

Er, you are aware there's a homepage?

But you're really not trying to imply I'm obsessed with Markle, or indeed racist mysogynist...

Your posts above make it clear that you’re those things.

[DeepEnd]

bhstewie said:

Literally no idea what the tape is but on the deep fake video thing this is off-topic but worth a watch.

'I don't want to upset people': Tom Cruise deepfake creator speaks out

I literally had to watch that a few times and read the article several times to be sure that definitely wasn't actually him.

Terrifying if that's what's on the horizon.

Yes it is scary.

Heck if people believe (and spout) promises of fishing nirvana post brexit, they have no chance (evidently) against this technology it seems.

Another classic (this is a photoshop for those easily taken in)

https://twitter.com/coldwar_steve/status/121900262...

[Sway]

El stovey said:

Sway said:

Er, you are aware there's a homepage?

But you're really not trying to imply I'm obsessed with Markle, or indeed racist mysogynist...

Your posts above make it clear that you’re those things.

Please feel free to quote them, or retract and apologise...

At least you've the balls to make an actual direct accusation, flawed though it be.

[Sheets Tabuer]

Countdown said:

As I said earlier H&M didn’t like the way they were treated in the UK, and said “Right, fk the lot of you pathetic whinging miserable bds, we’re off!” And given some of the comments on here it’s not a surprise why they felt like that.

I have no dog in this fight but I can't help but think everything is always other peoples fault, she's always the victim. The victim of her Father, Sister, the media, the UK, the royal family,

It's rather like saying all my ex's were nuts..

Edited by Sheets Tabuer on Sunday 7th March 09:20

[bitchstewie]

Sway said:

Er, you are aware there's a homepage?

But you're really not trying to imply I'm obsessed with Markle, or indeed racist/ mysogynist...

I said it's driven for a lot of people by many factors and you've taken the worst two and got all defensive.

Maybe it's the fact she's successful? I mean she's a "ruthless social climber" apparently.

Or perhaps it's the sex tape that you accidentally stumbled across (it's easily done) and which she apparently "permitted".

Assuming it's real how do you know she "permitted" it?

[bobbo89]

Sheets Tabuer said:

I have no dog in this fight but I can't help but think everything is always other peoples fault, she's always the victim. The victim of her Father, Sister, the media, the UK, the royal family,

It's rather like saying all my exe's were nuts..

This is where I'm at with it all.

I also don't get why, with their combined wealth, they couldn't have just fked off and kept an incredibly low profile. I'm pretty certain with their money it would have been remarkably easy to pretty much disappear. Everything that's going on now is all their own doing....

[bitchstewie]

Sheets Tabuer said:

I have no dog in this fight but I can't help but think everything is always other peoples fault, she's always the victim. The victim of her Father, Sister, the media, the UK, the royal family,

It's rather like saying all my exe's were nuts..

Given both their backgrounds I wouldn't be at all surprised if there's an element of "damaged goods" around them both.

I don't think anyone is suggesting they've made perfect decisions with perfect timing.

More that the amount of vitriol aimed at both of them is frankly just bizarre relative to anything they've actually done.

[Sway]

bhstewie said:

Sway said:

Er, you are aware there's a homepage?

But you're really not trying to imply I'm obsessed with Markle, or indeed racist/ mysogynist...

I said it's driven for a lot of people by many factors and you've taken the worst two and got all defensive.

Maybe it's the fact she's successful? I mean she's a "ruthless social climber" apparently.

Or perhaps it's the sex tape that you accidentally stumbled across (it's easily done) and which she apparently "permitted".

Assuming it's real how do you know she "permitted" it?

So "ruthless social climber" has somehow now become a gender specific insult, but "damaged goods" is fine to use?

[bitchstewie]

Sway said:

So "ruthless social climber" has somehow now become a gender specific insult, but "damaged goods" is fine to use?

Given the fact the Daily Mail have been told to print a front page statement about their coverage of the couple and given all of the stuff we've seen in the press from her family and knowing what's public about Harry's past I'm totally comfortable saying I wouldn't be surprised if there's an element of "damaged goods" there.

Saying "she's known as a ruthless social climber" which I specifically said relates to her success feels rather like it's just more Daily Mail rhetoric but perhaps it was in the comments section on Pornhub.

Perception of course and people are free to pick me up on it as you have.

How do you know she permitted the alleged sex tape?

[Sway]

bhstewie said:

Sway said:

So "ruthless social climber" has somehow now become a gender specific insult, but "damaged goods" is fine to use?

Given the fact the Daily Mail have been told to print a front page statement about their coverage of the couple and given all of the stuff we've seen in the press from her family and knowing what's public about Harry's past I'm totally comfortable saying I wouldn't be surprised if there's an element of "damaged goods" there.

Saying "she's known as a ruthless social climber" which I specifically said relates to her success feels rather like it's just more Daily Mail rhetoric but perhaps it was in the comments section on Pornhub.

Perception of course and people are free to pick me up on it as you have.

How do you know she permitted the alleged sex tape?

I don't know she permitted it - which is why I didn't claim she had.

I said "I'm saying that it's hardly unheard of for someone who wishes to increase their profile to permit a sex tape to come out. Kim K seems to be the role model."

[anonymous-user]

Sway said:

El stovey said:

Sway said:

Er, you are aware there's a homepage?

But you're really not trying to imply I'm obsessed with Markle, or indeed racist mysogynist...

Your posts above make it clear that you’re those things.

Please feel free to quote them, or retract and apologise...

At least you've the balls to make an actual direct accusation, flawed though it be.

Sway said:

El stovey said:

PH_77 said:

I'd always be wary of anyone who'll get naked and will fk or pretend to fk, or do a suck job for money, whilst knowingly being filmed.

Are you trying to describe actors doing nude or sex scenes or do you think she’s a porn star?

The scenes in Suits - actress.

The sex tape? Hmm...

Sway said:

No, I'm saying that it's hardly unheard of for someone who wishes to increase their profile to permit a sex tape to come out. Kim K seems to be the role model.

Sway said:

Sex tape was on pronhub. Not my most difficult wk.

Obsessed with Markle by posting loads about her and wking over her alleged sex tape whilst defending comments made by pH_77 and then making out she made a tape and released it for money and fame with no evidence whatsoever.

[BrabusMog]

This thread is mental you’re arguing about people you don’t know and trying to score silly points against each other. Mental.