Harry and Meghan
Discussion
People don't realise when they are being manipulated, i think this is a prime example really, becuase she has done F all wrong, yet people hate her.
Dragging up her past, well Harry's past is far more colourful...
I couldn't give a s
te really just hope maybe one day if opens up the debate to Rexit, she is perfectly position to give a normal person view of the 'firm'.
Dragging up her past, well Harry's past is far more colourful...
I couldn't give a s
te really just hope maybe one day if opens up the debate to Rexit, she is perfectly position to give a normal person view of the 'firm'.
Ian Geary said:
Still think her flounce off to USA was wrong, and chuckled when I heard staff call Harry "the hostage"..
Slightly O/T - in my experience it's not uncommon for "Families" to resent the new daughter-in-law, or to struggle to accept that their darling son/brother now has somebody in his life that he cares more about than them, and the relationship has irrevocably changed.
moorx said:
Randy Winkman said:
Grandad Gaz said:
My opinion,
There is a big difference between Meghan and Kate. Kate is genuine, Meghan is not.
It’s that simple.
Is being undemanding "genuine"?There is a big difference between Meghan and Kate. Kate is genuine, Meghan is not.
It’s that simple.
AnotherClarkey said:
moorx said:
Randy Winkman said:
Grandad Gaz said:
My opinion,
There is a big difference between Meghan and Kate. Kate is genuine, Meghan is not.
It’s that simple.
Is being undemanding "genuine"?There is a big difference between Meghan and Kate. Kate is genuine, Meghan is not.
It’s that simple.
Gary C said:
I can't really understand why we care ?
Let them rant and rave and bks to the pair of them.
I can't understand either, why are they even news?Let them rant and rave and b
ks to the pair of them.For example, here's a not news news story about how nothing they say matters and they aren't news:
It's a small thing, just an 11 page spread about how none of us cares about them. Haha look how we don't care, WE WILL TELL YOU FOR 11 PAGES OF A NATIONAL NEWSPAPER TO PROVE WE DON'T CARE!!!
Anyway, sorry, I got confused, who is ranting and raving? It's "them" right?
Just read the live commentary on the BBC as the interview is being shown in the US:
"In response to Oprah asking her whether she was "silent" or "silenced", Meghan says it was the latter."
"Meghan is asked by Oprah about baby Archie - who was not made a prince at his birth... She says she found the news "really hard" - not because she wanted the title but because it meant he wouldn't receive security... She says the convention, meaning her children would be prince or princess, was changed while she was pregnant."
Oprah asks Meghan about why she thinks the Royal Family didn't want to make Archie a prince.
"Why do you think that is? Do you think it's because of his race? I know that's a loaded question." says Oprah.
"I can give you an honest answer," says Meghan.
"In those months when I was pregnant, all around this same time so we have in tandem the conversation of he won't be given security, he's not going to be given a title, and also concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he was born."
Oprah asks her who said that.
Meghan doesn't answer, and Oprah asks again.
"There are several conversations about it," says Meghan. The conversation was with Harry, she says, and about how dark the baby's going to be "potentially and what that would mean or look like".
She refuses to say who it is, saying: "I think that would be very damaging to them."
Wow, that's going to put the cat amongst the pigeons!!
"In response to Oprah asking her whether she was "silent" or "silenced", Meghan says it was the latter."
"Meghan is asked by Oprah about baby Archie - who was not made a prince at his birth... She says she found the news "really hard" - not because she wanted the title but because it meant he wouldn't receive security... She says the convention, meaning her children would be prince or princess, was changed while she was pregnant."
Oprah asks Meghan about why she thinks the Royal Family didn't want to make Archie a prince.
"Why do you think that is? Do you think it's because of his race? I know that's a loaded question." says Oprah.
"I can give you an honest answer," says Meghan.
"In those months when I was pregnant, all around this same time so we have in tandem the conversation of he won't be given security, he's not going to be given a title, and also concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he was born."
Oprah asks her who said that.
Meghan doesn't answer, and Oprah asks again.
"There are several conversations about it," says Meghan. The conversation was with Harry, she says, and about how dark the baby's going to be "potentially and what that would mean or look like".
She refuses to say who it is, saying: "I think that would be very damaging to them."
Wow, that's going to put the cat amongst the pigeons!!
OzzyR1 said:
Just read the live commentary on the BBC as the interview is being shown in the US:
"In response to Oprah asking her whether she was "silent" or "silenced", Meghan says it was the latter."
"Meghan is asked by Oprah about baby Archie - who was not made a prince at his birth... She says she found the news "really hard" - not because she wanted the title but because it meant he wouldn't receive security... She says the convention, meaning her children would be prince or princess, was changed while she was pregnant."
Oprah asks Meghan about why she thinks the Royal Family didn't want to make Archie a prince.
"Why do you think that is? Do you think it's because of his race? I know that's a loaded question." says Oprah.
"I can give you an honest answer," says Meghan.
"In those months when I was pregnant, all around this same time so we have in tandem the conversation of he won't be given security, he's not going to be given a title, and also concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he was born."
Oprah asks her who said that.
Meghan doesn't answer, and Oprah asks again.
"There are several conversations about it," says Meghan. The conversation was with Harry, she says, and about how dark the baby's going to be "potentially and what that would mean or look like".
She refuses to say who it is, saying: "I think that would be very damaging to them."
Wow, that's going to put the cat amongst the pigeons!!
It would appear that’s going viral and equality groups and leading African Americans are not holding back on Twitter. "In response to Oprah asking her whether she was "silent" or "silenced", Meghan says it was the latter."
"Meghan is asked by Oprah about baby Archie - who was not made a prince at his birth... She says she found the news "really hard" - not because she wanted the title but because it meant he wouldn't receive security... She says the convention, meaning her children would be prince or princess, was changed while she was pregnant."
Oprah asks Meghan about why she thinks the Royal Family didn't want to make Archie a prince.
"Why do you think that is? Do you think it's because of his race? I know that's a loaded question." says Oprah.
"I can give you an honest answer," says Meghan.
"In those months when I was pregnant, all around this same time so we have in tandem the conversation of he won't be given security, he's not going to be given a title, and also concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he was born."
Oprah asks her who said that.
Meghan doesn't answer, and Oprah asks again.
"There are several conversations about it," says Meghan. The conversation was with Harry, she says, and about how dark the baby's going to be "potentially and what that would mean or look like".
She refuses to say who it is, saying: "I think that would be very damaging to them."
Wow, that's going to put the cat amongst the pigeons!!
They might be about to pull the rf into blm.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff