Epstein dead in cell
Discussion
Vanden Saab said:
vonuber said:
Come on, is anyone surprised?
This was always going to happen. Far too many powerful people implicated.
I wonder what happened to all those cd's they found.
CDs? I thought it was young girls... This was always going to happen. Far too many powerful people implicated.
I wonder what happened to all those cd's they found.
JPJPJP said:
from a twitter response"While this is obviously a dog-whistle tweet to fire up the conspiratorially-minded elements of your base, it is worth noting that he had been removed from suicide watch in late July.
The motives for that? Ask your AG William Barr, it was his DOJ that had jurisdiction on it."
JPJPJP said:
Surprised he is taking this line seeing as Trump was Epstein’s ‘best friend’ at one point and has already been accused of raping someone underage. Lentilist said:
"Powerful and wealthy man who has operated in plain sight for decades and must have felt beyond the law suddenly realises he is likely about to lose everything and spend the rest of his life in prison where they really, really like paedophiles decides to kill himself" would seem a reasonable conclusion from Mr Occam's point of view? The alternative requires the default acceptance of a global paedophile elite who have infiltrated multiple governments, organisations and families before you even consider whether they'd then be moved to assassinate a man in prison. You'd have to buy into the QAnon worldview before you even considered Epstein's demise and what caused it, and if you've crossed that rubicon, Occam has already long since left your rear view mirror IMO.
I have no idea what went on. However, your logic is flawed. If one accepts that he hanged himself, then we are left with a couple of questions that leave your logic struggling.
A man on suicide watch, whom, one might assume, had had any items that could be used for hanging himself removed, hangs himself. My first question is where was the chap who was watching him. It takes time to hand oneself, quite a significant amount of time in fact.
The second questions is how did he get hold of the items which he hanged himself with?
Derek Smith said:
Lentilist said:
"Powerful and wealthy man who has operated in plain sight for decades and must have felt beyond the law suddenly realises he is likely about to lose everything and spend the rest of his life in prison where they really, really like paedophiles decides to kill himself" would seem a reasonable conclusion from Mr Occam's point of view? The alternative requires the default acceptance of a global paedophile elite who have infiltrated multiple governments, organisations and families before you even consider whether they'd then be moved to assassinate a man in prison. You'd have to buy into the QAnon worldview before you even considered Epstein's demise and what caused it, and if you've crossed that rubicon, Occam has already long since left your rear view mirror IMO.
I have no idea what went on. However, your logic is flawed. If one accepts that he hanged himself, then we are left with a couple of questions that leave your logic struggling.
A man on suicide watch, whom, one might assume, had had any items that could be used for hanging himself removed, hangs himself. My first question is where was the chap who was watching him. It takes time to hand oneself, quite a significant amount of time in fact.
The second questions is how did he get hold of the items which he hanged himself with?
[We're still early into this - rumours are rife atm]
andy_s said:
Derek Smith said:
Lentilist said:
"Powerful and wealthy man who has operated in plain sight for decades and must have felt beyond the law suddenly realises he is likely about to lose everything and spend the rest of his life in prison where they really, really like paedophiles decides to kill himself" would seem a reasonable conclusion from Mr Occam's point of view? The alternative requires the default acceptance of a global paedophile elite who have infiltrated multiple governments, organisations and families before you even consider whether they'd then be moved to assassinate a man in prison. You'd have to buy into the QAnon worldview before you even considered Epstein's demise and what caused it, and if you've crossed that rubicon, Occam has already long since left your rear view mirror IMO.
I have no idea what went on. However, your logic is flawed. If one accepts that he hanged himself, then we are left with a couple of questions that leave your logic struggling.
A man on suicide watch, whom, one might assume, had had any items that could be used for hanging himself removed, hangs himself. My first question is where was the chap who was watching him. It takes time to hand oneself, quite a significant amount of time in fact.
The second questions is how did he get hold of the items which he hanged himself with?
[We're still early into this - rumours are rife atm]
p1stonhead said:
andy_s said:
Derek Smith said:
Lentilist said:
"Powerful and wealthy man who has operated in plain sight for decades and must have felt beyond the law suddenly realises he is likely about to lose everything and spend the rest of his life in prison where they really, really like paedophiles decides to kill himself" would seem a reasonable conclusion from Mr Occam's point of view? The alternative requires the default acceptance of a global paedophile elite who have infiltrated multiple governments, organisations and families before you even consider whether they'd then be moved to assassinate a man in prison. You'd have to buy into the QAnon worldview before you even considered Epstein's demise and what caused it, and if you've crossed that rubicon, Occam has already long since left your rear view mirror IMO.
I have no idea what went on. However, your logic is flawed. If one accepts that he hanged himself, then we are left with a couple of questions that leave your logic struggling.
A man on suicide watch, whom, one might assume, had had any items that could be used for hanging himself removed, hangs himself. My first question is where was the chap who was watching him. It takes time to hand oneself, quite a significant amount of time in fact.
The second questions is how did he get hold of the items which he hanged himself with?
[We're still early into this - rumours are rife atm]
Even though JE is dead, the Manhattan AG says the investigation will continue: https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/11602828890... - at least in part because there's a conspiracy element.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff