I’d be happy with another referendum if,,,,,

I’d be happy with another referendum if,,,,,

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
If the options are

1. Stay
2. Leave but only after the politicians argue amongst themselves for 4 years about whether they should or not then arrive at a consensus and then act on that whichever they decide

Vaud

50,482 posts

155 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
PositronicRay said:
How do they decide what goes to referendum?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_in_Switzerlan...

A very different model.

jet_noise

5,648 posts

182 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
Much grin-enabling silliness in this thread.
Far better than the somewhat tetchy dialogues in other Eurexit threads smile

Keep it up thumbup

PositronicRay

27,014 posts

183 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
Vaud said:
PositronicRay said:
How do they decide what goes to referendum?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_in_Switzerlan...

A very different model.
It looks complicated.

Vaud

50,482 posts

155 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
PositronicRay said:
It looks complicated.
It is fairly logical - and given the further complexity of the Cantons.

But then having seen how complex the UK parliamentary process has been in recent months, and how many complex archaic processes exist, I suspect the UK model could also be challenged as complicated?

Murph7355

37,714 posts

256 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
Nickgnome said:
....
As a group the electorate are not we’ll informed and very prejudice. Our democracy irons that out....
Our current crop of MPs belies that and suggests our democracy has failed at ironing anything out.

MPs are "normal" people. Some brighter than others. Some more appropriately skilled than others. Having MP after their name does not make them any better informed or any less prejudiced. The current crop put a good case forward to the contrary!

Nickgnome said:
IQ and EQ test. Not sure what score but has to be over 100

Include anyone over 12. It is their future after all. Subject to 1.

What’s not to like?
That you think IQ and EQ tests are good enough measures for anything other than mild amusement should be sufficient to exclude you from voting smile

That you then note "12" as long as the IQ level is met suggests you need to read up more on how IQ is calculated.

But why 12? Why not 11? Or 10? Or 7? It's their future to you know smile

V10leptoquark

5,180 posts

217 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
For any future EU referendum, lessons learnt from the voice of remainers, it must be decided by a significant margin.
There can be no 50.1% win on the topic of the EU - by remainers own words. wink

What were the suggested figures banded around back in 2016?
60-40 was it?


PositronicRay

27,014 posts

183 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
Vaud said:
PositronicRay said:
It looks complicated.
It is fairly logical - and given the further complexity of the Cantons.

But then having seen how complex the UK parliamentary process has been in recent months, and how many complex archaic processes exist, I suspect the UK model could also be challenged as complicated?
I couldn't agree more, arguably introducing a referendum into the mix is a step too far.

Nickgnome

8,277 posts

89 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
Nickgnome said:
....
As a group the electorate are not we’ll informed and very prejudice. Our democracy irons that out....
Our current crop of MPs belies that and suggests our democracy has failed at ironing anything out.

MPs are "normal" people. Some brighter than others. Some more appropriately skilled than others. Having MP after their name does not make them any better informed or any less prejudiced. The current crop put a good case forward to the contrary!

Nickgnome said:
IQ and EQ test. Not sure what score but has to be over 100

Include anyone over 12. It is their future after all. Subject to 1.

What’s not to like?
That you think IQ and EQ tests are good enough measures for anything other than mild amusement should be sufficient to exclude you from voting smile

That you then note "12" as long as the IQ level is met suggests you need to read up more on how IQ is calculated.

But why 12? Why not 11? Or 10? Or 7? It's their future to you know smile
You are a bit late to the party on this one.

Surely if it reasonable to set a lower age limit, then it must be reasonable to have an upper limit and the test would ensure equality.

Your local electorate chose your MP and also if they were bothered contributed to the candidate selection process. The quality of your MP is therefore directly linked to the electorate in your area.

768

13,681 posts

96 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
Taylor James said:
I'd be happy with another one when we've been out for as long as we have been in. So, around 2069. I think that would be fair.
That's not fair, the EU will be a distant memory by then.

Vaud

50,482 posts

155 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
768 said:
That's not fair, the EU will be a distant memory by then.
I doubt it. I think it will ultimately collapse (or rather I think it will go, slice by slice) but I think it will take until 2050 at least.

Pan Pan Pan

9,902 posts

111 months

Sunday 18th August 2019
quotequote all
dandarez said:
Agree, I waited 41 years to vote in the second one.
Got it wrong in 1975, but simply (like the vast majority) got on with life despite oil crisis and other little things like inflation peaking around 26%! eek

Wonder why we didn't jump up and down like losers do these days?
The only thing is, that in 1975 the EU did not exist, nor would it, for many years to come.
How could the people of the UK in 1975 be asked to vote for something that not only, did not exist, but had (then) absolutely no knowledge of what an EU was or what it do / mean for them?
Given all the Hoo Haa, legal challenges, debates in parliament, and in the media etc that has occurred following the only democratic vote the citizens of the UK have ever been given on the UK`s EU membership, I wonder if the UK`s `membership' is even legal?
We could have another referendum as you say in 40 years time, or even another one now, but a remain in the EU option on the ballot paper must categorically not exist. That question has already been asked and answered by the 2016 referendum which has yet to be enacted (as stated by the government in writing that it would be acted upon0..

Mr Penfold

15,137 posts

200 months

Sunday 18th August 2019
quotequote all
Vaud said:
768 said:
That's not fair, the EU will be a distant memory by then.
I doubt it. I think it will ultimately collapse (or rather I think it will go, slice by slice) but I think it will take until 2050 at least.
With their stubborn conceited arrogant attitude, they will not notice till it has gone

rdjohn

6,179 posts

195 months

Sunday 18th August 2019
quotequote all
Nickgnome said:
Your local electorate chose your MP and also if they were bothered contributed to the candidate selection process. The quality of your MP is therefore directly linked to the electorate in your area.
I am not sure that the system is a robust as you believe.

On C4 News this week, we were introduced to Labour’s shadow Education secretary talking about their brave new world for only allowing students apply to universities, once their grades are known.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Rayner

Virtually every sentence she spoke was grammatically incorrect. Despite having no formal qualifications she is paid £74k, plus expenses, to represent the people of Ashton-U-Lyne. They voted quite heavily in favour of Leave, yet openly stated that she feels free to dismiss their views and support Remain.

70% of MPs represent constituencies that voted Leave. 94% agreed to implement the outcome of the vote. The current wrangling is a massive shame on the mother of all Parliaments.

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

224 months

Sunday 18th August 2019
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
Nickgnome said:
Your local electorate chose your MP and also if they were bothered contributed to the candidate selection process. The quality of your MP is therefore directly linked to the electorate in your area.
I am not sure that the system is a robust as you believe.

On C4 News this week, we were introduced to Labour’s shadow Education secretary talking about their brave new world for only allowing students apply to universities, once their grades are known.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Rayner

Virtually every sentence she spoke was grammatically incorrect. Despite having no formal qualifications she is paid £74k, plus expenses, to represent the people of Ashton-U-Lyne. They voted quite heavily in favour of Leave, yet openly stated that she feels free to dismiss their views and support Remain.

70% of MPs represent constituencies that voted Leave. 94% agreed to implement the outcome of the vote. The current wrangling is a massive shame on the mother of all Parliaments.
Describes herself as 'soft left'. Of course she favours 'more' government of any kind, more job opportunities. £74k a year, guaranteed paye. She wouldn't have a clue how much turnover an sme would need to pay its owner a wage like that. Never engineers are they, or surveyors, or brick layers, or pilots, always some public sector non job.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 18th August 2019
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
Nickgnome said:
Your local electorate chose your MP and also if they were bothered contributed to the candidate selection process. The quality of your MP is therefore directly linked to the electorate in your area.
I am not sure that the system is a robust as you believe.

On C4 News this week, we were introduced to Labour’s shadow Education secretary talking about their brave new world for only allowing students apply to universities, once their grades are known.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Rayner

Virtually every sentence she spoke was grammatically incorrect. Despite having no formal qualifications she is paid £74k, plus expenses, to represent the people of Ashton-U-Lyne. They voted quite heavily in favour of Leave, yet openly stated that she feels free to dismiss their views and support Remain.

70% of MPs represent constituencies that voted Leave. 94% agreed to implement the outcome of the vote. The current wrangling is a massive shame on the mother of all Parliaments.
If we doing %ages, a poll this week, according to the BBC, showed that when asked the following:

Should MPs, once elected, do what they want to do or what their constituents want them to do?

80% of MPs chose the former.
93% of voters chose the latter.

Out of touch?

Light years away.

Glosphil

4,355 posts

234 months

Sunday 18th August 2019
quotequote all
The best deal the UK will ever have from the EU is the one we have now. We shouldn't leave.
The UK standing alone has far less influence then as a member of the EU.
Outside the EU the UK will still be affected by many of its decisions but with no say in their formation.
The referendum campaigns by both sides were a disgrace of mis-information resulting in a decision based on prejudices and false 'facts'.

Canute

566 posts

68 months

Sunday 18th August 2019
quotequote all
if middle England doesn't get a vote at all and Brits abroad (most affected) are given a fair say, many were not allowed last time and now having various freedoms and worse stripped from them if the blonde fknuckle Borris carries on.

rdjohn

6,179 posts

195 months

Sunday 18th August 2019
quotequote all
Glosphil said:
The best deal the UK will ever have from the EU is the one we have now. We shouldn't leave.
The UK standing alone has far less influence then as a member of the EU.
Outside the EU the UK will still be affected by many of its decisions but with no say in their formation.
The referendum campaigns by both sides were a disgrace of mis-information resulting in a decision based on prejudices and false 'facts'.
So the fact that the majority of the population disagree with you has no bearing on what should happen?

You feel that your opinion should prevail, no matter what.

Canute

566 posts

68 months

Sunday 18th August 2019
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
So the fact that the majority of the population disagree with you has no bearing on what should happen?

You feel that your opinion should prevail, no matter what.
Error, the majority of the small portion of people who turned out in 2016.... We all know what it would be now.