Labour looking to remove Tom Watson

Labour looking to remove Tom Watson

Author
Discussion

Down and out

2,700 posts

65 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
CypSIdders said:
Because, the last time a national poll on the subject was undertaken support for leave ran to a grand total of 37.4% of the "people", hardly a ringing endorsement, by any estimation.

For blatantly obvious reasons, the "winners", from day one, have clung onto the 52% figure because it sounds so much better than 37.4%!

The will of the people runs at 37.4%, there's no getting around that fact!
Of course you'd be saying this if remain won 52/48.

smifffymoto

4,564 posts

206 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
biggles330d said:
Back on topic...

I'm going to watch in fascination how this next election plays out. I'm pretty sure much of the country remain's fair tribal in its politics regardless of the quite obvious self destruction of both main parties. In that sense, it honestly doesn't matter what anyone puts in their manifesto because the vote will go along tribal, not specific policy lines, never mind voting for your local candidate based on them acting in your interest and doing a good job which is actually how our parliamentary democracy works.

Who Momentum thinks they are appealing to, I've no idea. Corbyn's core audience must be a tiny niche that has little room for growth I'd have thought.
I think you are right to a certain degree.We the voter can’t trust a word that politicians speak so we will vote on the previous form of each party when they were in Government.

Jasandjules

69,931 posts

230 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
CypSIdders said:
Because, the last time a national poll on the subject was undertaken support for leave ran to a grand total of 37.4% of the "people", hardly a ringing endorsement, by any estimation.
And the general election turnout, voting percentage and thus actual total vote of the "people"?

bitchstewie

51,395 posts

211 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
biggles330d said:
Back on topic...

I'm going to watch in fascination how this next election plays out. I'm pretty sure much of the country remain's fair tribal in its politics regardless of the quite obvious self destruction of both main parties. In that sense, it honestly doesn't matter what anyone puts in their manifesto because the vote will go along tribal, not specific policy lines, never mind voting for your local candidate based on them acting in your interest and doing a good job which is actually how our parliamentary democracy works.

Who Momentum thinks they are appealing to, I've no idea. Corbyn's core audience must be a tiny niche that has little room for growth I'd have thought.
I've just been listening to Matt Frei and was driving so perhaps wasn't paying perfect attention but he had a number of guests on who suggested that Momentum don't care about power and are more concerned about the ideological "purity of the Labour Party.

amusingduck

9,398 posts

137 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
CypSIdders said:
Welshbeef said:
In any result why do the losing side always come out with the stat
Because, the last time a national poll on the subject was undertaken support for leave ran to a grand total of 37.4% of the "people", hardly a ringing endorsement, by any estimation.

For blatantly obvious reasons, the "winners", from day one, have clung onto the 52% figure because it sounds so much better than 37.4%!

The will of the people runs at 37.4%, there's no getting around that fact!
Your argument is that, if either option got 98% of the votes in a referendum where turnout was 0.1% shy of the high water mark, none of the options would win because that still wouldn't be more than 50% of the population.

Nice logic, did you think of it yourself?

roflroflroflrofl


Zirconia

36,010 posts

285 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
I've just been listening to Matt Frei and was driving so perhaps wasn't paying perfect attention but he had a number of guests on who suggested that Momentum don't care about power and are more concerned about the ideological "purity of the Labour Party.
Interesting. I have them down as power zealots and needing to control the rest in their image, have to dig out that Matt Frei bit for a shufty.

bitchstewie

51,395 posts

211 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
Zirconia said:
Interesting. I have them down as power zealots and needing to control the rest in their image, have to dig out that Matt Frei bit for a shufty.
Sorry, I should rephrase, they care about having power within the party, total power, but not so much about being in government.

A Winner Is You

24,990 posts

228 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
Good for them, there is no place for those who do nothing but oppose the Labour leader*






  • except for when Corbyn did it 400+ times as a backbencher, that was because he is a man of principle.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
I used to think Ed Balls and Ed Milliband were thick/challenged. How I wish to have that calibre back in the Labour Party.

On R4 recently some members MPs were saying Loer Starmer was the most intelligent person they had ever met.

Then you had Angela Rayner the other week in that long debate apologise to Bercow “I don’t really know the rules but will speak my mind”. You’ve been there years putting your hand up claiming ineptness and then permitted to speak is baffling.
That was Jess Philips, easily mixed up as she is another thick Labour politician.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
T-195 said:
Why not?

It wasn't the Lib Dems who decided to have the Referendum, in which roughly 30% of the people voted Leave.
You are wrong. The Lib Dems were the first to raise holding an in/out referendum.

Zirconia

36,010 posts

285 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Sorry, I should rephrase, they care about having power within the party, total power, but not so much about being in government.
Yeah, what I understood from your comment.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
It's one of the things I find fascinating.

You look at the likes of Kier Starmer, Tom Watson, David Lammy, Yvette Cooper, and many others and I don't believe they see Corbyn as representing their vision of Labour values.

The question is, I guess, do they accept that outside the party system they probably have little chance of being elected, or is the assumption that Corbyn is a "bump in the road"?
The MPs voted against Corbyn twice in votes of no confidence. The majority of current Labour MPs dont reflect the party membership anymore, they have lost control of their party and wont be getting it back.

If they were honest, they would all resign and start a new party.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
They didn’t vote they chose not to as such they didn’t care on the result either way.

Do you know what the Yes to the 1975 vote was “the people”


Well 2016 72% turnout and a 17.5m yes vote
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_201...

Only 43.44% of the people voted to join the European Commission in 1975.

So how do you (from your post I’m assuming your a remain voter / comes over that way) Square the circle? We should never have joined in the first place it wasn’t the will of the people

2016 37% to leave
1975 43% to join

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_197...
No one voted to join the EEC.

Why do people continue to get this fact wrong?

valiant

10,279 posts

161 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
biggles330d said:
Back on topic...

I'm going to watch in fascination how this next election plays out. I'm pretty sure much of the country remain's fair tribal in its politics regardless of the quite obvious self destruction of both main parties. In that sense, it honestly doesn't matter what anyone puts in their manifesto because the vote will go along tribal, not specific policy lines, never mind voting for your local candidate based on them acting in your interest and doing a good job which is actually how our parliamentary democracy works.

Who Momentum thinks they are appealing to, I've no idea. Corbyn's core audience must be a tiny niche that has little room for growth I'd have thought.
I've just been listening to Matt Frei and was driving so perhaps wasn't paying perfect attention but he had a number of guests on who suggested that Momentum don't care about power and are more concerned about the ideological "purity of the Labour Party.
At this rate even Corbyn won’t be Corbynist enough for the party.



bitchstewie

51,395 posts

211 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
valiant said:
At this rate even Corbyn won’t be Corbynist enough for the party.
They played a clip of Corbyn on his way to the conference this morning.

Stage managed and as insincere as fk.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
jsf said:
Welshbeef said:
They didn’t vote they chose not to as such they didn’t care on the result either way.

Do you know what the Yes to the 1975 vote was “the people”


Well 2016 72% turnout and a 17.5m yes vote
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_201...

Only 43.44% of the people voted to join the European Commission in 1975.

So how do you (from your post I’m assuming your a remain voter / comes over that way) Square the circle? We should never have joined in the first place it wasn’t the will of the people

2016 37% to leave
1975 43% to join

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_197...
No one voted to join the EEC.

Why do people continue to get this fact wrong?
Only 43% of the people wanted in

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Only 43% of the people wanted in
There was no vote to join.

The government took the country in.

Two years later there was a vote on whether to stay or leave.

Beauford

32 posts

243 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
I voted in the first referendum. What was offered was a 'Common Market' where it would be easier to export and import goods.

The British people were repeatedly assured that there was no intention of having a European Union, even though those same politicians knew at the time that this would happen in the future. Cabinet papers released since showed that they knew that the public would never vote for a 'Union' so they lied to get the vote.

I didn't realise this until I first saw a blue flag with a ring of yellow stars saying 'European Union' . I was shocked then because it was clear that we had been utterly betrayed. Treaties since then, over which I had no vote, have given away our sovereignty to unelected commissioners over whom we have absolutely no influence. Our MEP's do not have any power to change legislation, or even introduce laws.

There has never been a mandate from the British people to join a 'European Union' and I suspect this is the reason that the Leave vote won.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
jsf said:
There was no vote to join.

The government took the country in.

Two years later there was a vote on whether to stay or leave.
Ok so only 43% of the people voted to stay in.
We should have left.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 21st September 2019
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Ok so only 43% of the people voted to stay in.
We should have left.
They voted to stay in the EEC.

The only vote on EU membership has been to leave.