Climate change - the POLITICAL debate (Vol 6)
Discussion
Etypephil said:
turbobloke said:
I was thinking that, but didn't post it.
Gadgetmac said:
Says the man so triggered by a 16 year old girl he stooped to calling her a despicable name which got deleted by the mods as being completely unacceptable.
Triggered? I’m not the one foot stamping, spitting, and running to moderators complaining about other’s post, just because I disagree with them.Etypephil said:
Gadgetmac said:
Says the man so triggered by a 16 year old girl he stooped to calling her a despicable name which got deleted by the mods as being completely unacceptable.
Triggered? I’m not the one foot stamping, spitting, and running to moderators complaining about other’s post, just because I disagree with them.
Even now she 'flicks your switch' as demonstrated by your conjuring up of a puerile name like Gretian.
Looking at the thread so many people pointed out how wrong your crass name for her was that I suspect more than one person hit the report button.
Ozgate: this one involves journos which isn't surprising.
https://www.theunshackled.net/australian-politics/...
https://www.theunshackled.net/australian-politics/...
The Labour Manifesto has just called for the building of new houses at a rate not seen since the pre-fab era after the second world war.
How does that match up with the green promises ? Building stuff is bad for the environment on many levels, waste, pollution, loss of green space and trees, vehicular movements and the dreaded carbon emissions.
We are told we have a shrinking birth rate and a reducing population too, so are we now simply building houses to put people in who might be coming here ?
How does that match up with the green promises ? Building stuff is bad for the environment on many levels, waste, pollution, loss of green space and trees, vehicular movements and the dreaded carbon emissions.
We are told we have a shrinking birth rate and a reducing population too, so are we now simply building houses to put people in who might be coming here ?
turbobloke said:
Ozgate: this one involves journos which isn't surprising.
https://www.theunshackled.net/australian-politics/...
Good to see the networks going with the current scientific consensus and not giving any weight to the rambling of loons who are backed by exxon oil cash.https://www.theunshackled.net/australian-politics/...
Also good to see you are still getting your daily fix from rabid right wing blogs.
I just looked at the front page of that link
Gadgetmac said:
turbobloke said:
Ozgate: this one involves journos which isn't surprising.
https://www.theunshackled.net/australian-politics/...
Good to see the networks going with the current scientific consensus and not giving any weight to the rambling of loons who are backed by exxon oil cash.https://www.theunshackled.net/australian-politics/...
Also good to see you are still getting your daily fix from rabid right wing blogs.
She gave over four millions dollars to the Institute of Public Affairs "charity" in 2016-2017 to lobby against action on climate change and support removing the minimum wage. All familiar themes for anyone aware of the parallel work of The Heartland Institute...
Gadgetmac said:
Instead you're the one spitting your dummy out over what a teenage school girl says to the point of calling her obscene names that you wouldn't in public.
Even now she 'flicks your switch' as demonstrated by your conjuring up of a puerile name like Gretian.
Looking at the thread so many people pointed out how wrong your crass name for her was that I suspect more than one person hit the report button.
The term used is neither obscene nor inacurate. I do use the term in public, and whilst not everyone approves, you would be doubtless be surprised at the support its use in this context gets.Even now she 'flicks your switch' as demonstrated by your conjuring up of a puerile name like Gretian.
Looking at the thread so many people pointed out how wrong your crass name for her was that I suspect more than one person hit the report button.
A little more imaginitive, and accurate, than the Gretian favourite of "flat earther"; you all believe in Gretianity, whereas no realists believe that the earth is flat.
You may be interested to know that flat earth theory was spread by the experts of the day during the dark ages when people were not allowed to read the bible, in which the earth is very clearly described as being a sphere. A little like the experts of today stating categorically that there is a climate emergency, supporting their claims by controlling and manipulating information.
The fact that you, and possibly others, disagree and were supported by moderators doesn't make me wrong.
Edited by Etypephil on Thursday 21st November 09:46
- China now has almost 150 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity under active construction
- Global Energy Monitor, a non-profit group that tracks coal stations, obtained this total by examining plant-by-plant data
- This is equivalent to the 150 gigawatts of existing coal capacity in the EU
- It exceeds the combined 105 gigawatts under construction in the rest of the world
- Beijing remains fully committed to coal as its biggest source of power and has put decarbonisation on the back coal burner
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-11-20...
China, and to a similar degree Russia, play the west's climate fairytales obsession like a fiddle.
They're watching the west undergo expensive and pointless self-inflicted economic contraction with lifestyle ecofascism to go, while making the right noise once in a while as they carry on with policies that give energy security and cheap power for homes and businesses.
They're watching the west undergo expensive and pointless self-inflicted economic contraction with lifestyle ecofascism to go, while making the right noise once in a while as they carry on with policies that give energy security and cheap power for homes and businesses.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-5049...
Coldplay to pause touring until concerts are 'environmentally beneficial'
Coldplay have listened to PH Flat Earther concerns ref AGW hypocrisy.
Sounds like you guys really are making an impact.
Gammontastic!
Coldplay to pause touring until concerts are 'environmentally beneficial'
Coldplay have listened to PH Flat Earther concerns ref AGW hypocrisy.
Sounds like you guys really are making an impact.
Gammontastic!
Etypephil said:
The term used is neither obscene nor inacurate. I do use the term in public, and whilst not everyone approves, you would be doubtless be surprised at the support its use in this context gets.
A little more imaginitive, and accurate, than the Gretian favourite of "flat earther"; you all believe in Gretianity, whereas no realists believe that the earth is flat.
You may be interested to know that flat earth theory was spread by the experts of the day during the dark ages when people were not allowed to read the bible, in which the earth is very clearly described as being a sphere. A little like the experts of today stating categorically that there is a climate emergency, supporting their claims by controlling and manipulating information.
The fact that you, and possibly others, disagree and were supported by moderators doesn't make me wrong.
Yes it is obscene and inaccurate to use the term you used for her and thankfully the mods and most right thinking people agree with that and it was removed.A little more imaginitive, and accurate, than the Gretian favourite of "flat earther"; you all believe in Gretianity, whereas no realists believe that the earth is flat.
You may be interested to know that flat earth theory was spread by the experts of the day during the dark ages when people were not allowed to read the bible, in which the earth is very clearly described as being a sphere. A little like the experts of today stating categorically that there is a climate emergency, supporting their claims by controlling and manipulating information.
The fact that you, and possibly others, disagree and were supported by moderators doesn't make me wrong.
Edited by Etypephil on Thursday 21st November 09:46
And yes flat earthers is an appropriate term for those who don't believe the science but see conspiracy instead.
Green Daft Deal may increase the sales of scooters stateside more than previously thought
https://youtu.be/hlv69bWe40c
https://youtu.be/hlv69bWe40c
turbobloke said:
Ah good, another extreme right-wing/libertarian corporate funded organisations web page who think everything is a communist plot.turbobloke said:
IPA... now didn't they come up recently as the mining billionaire Gina Rinehart backed loonies/Heartland Institute clones?Is this anything to do with IPA falsifying Great Barrier Reef footage to show "Everything is ok"
Gadgetmac said:
Yes it is obscene and inaccurate to use the term you used for her and thankfully the mods and most right thinking people agree with that and it was removed.
And yes flat earthers is an appropriate term for those who don't believe the science but see conspiracy instead.
I am happy to debate, but not to enter into eternal contradiction.And yes flat earthers is an appropriate term for those who don't believe the science but see conspiracy instead.
Flat earther is an appropriate term to describe those who believe that the earth is flat, not those who refuse to accept hysterical outbursts from a teenager suffering arrested mental development, and vested interests.
Some of the USA hurricane data which is skewering silly statements from silly politicians was in Truchelut and Staehling. ISAAC is integrated sorm activity annually across the continental USA. They can't hide the decline in peak activity from 1930s warmth (tax gas insufficiency alert). Memo to gov Cuomo, several hit New York City before climatewang.
Talking of NETCW (natural early thirties climate warming) let's not forget 1930/31 in the Arctic when it was 4.6 °C warmer than the 1981–2010 average, with Calm Bay at 10.7 °C higher in February 1931 than in the modern period, skewering claptrap about unprecedented Arctic warming (data from Araźny et al).
Cool.
Talking of NETCW (natural early thirties climate warming) let's not forget 1930/31 in the Arctic when it was 4.6 °C warmer than the 1981–2010 average, with Calm Bay at 10.7 °C higher in February 1931 than in the modern period, skewering claptrap about unprecedented Arctic warming (data from Araźny et al).
Cool.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff