Boris Johnson- Prime Minister (Vol. 3)

[smn159]

ChevyChase77 said:

smn159 said:

ChevyChase77 said:

Corbyn as PM and Abbott as home secretary. It's a frightening thought. Still, Diane said she could put 10,000 extra police offices on the streets for only £30,000.

Whereas Johnson will build 40 new Hospitals and recruit 50,000 nurses presumably?

Abbott got tongue tied in an interview whereas Boris is deliberately lying.

She never got tongue tied. She didn't know. She tried to correct herself and still got it completely wrong.

I'll take no knowing during an interview over continually repeating something which you know is false and deliberately misleading.

[ChevyChase77]

abzmike said:

ChevyChase77 said:

Yet, he was only on TV doing an interview yesterday and is on again tonight.

You know as well as anyone that there are interviews, and there is a Brillo interview - He will not let the guest deploy thier carefully prepared soundbites, he will ask and probe for answers the others don't.
Marr, Ferrari, Phil and Holly don't interview..
Gove was on LBC this morning saying Ferrari had 'subjected Boris to interrogation' - Nothing could have been further from the truth.

Why does Neil have any god given right to interview Boris? The more someone whinges and moans, the less I'd be inclined to do it to wind them up.

[ChevyChase77]

smn159 said:

ChevyChase77 said:

smn159 said:

ChevyChase77 said:

Corbyn as PM and Abbott as home secretary. It's a frightening thought. Still, Diane said she could put 10,000 extra police offices on the streets for only £30,000.

Whereas Johnson will build 40 new Hospitals and recruit 50,000 nurses presumably?

Abbott got tongue tied in an interview whereas Boris is deliberately lying.

She never got tongue tied. She didn't know. She tried to correct herself and still got it completely wrong.

I'll take no knowing during an interview over continually repeating something which you know is false and deliberately misleading.

So it's now confusing which person you are backing up here...........

[bitchstewie]

I don't always agree with David Lammy but I think he's on the money with this one.

https://twitter.com/DavidLammy/status/120288502789...

[don'tbesilly]

bhstewie said:

I don't always agree with David Lammy but I think he's on the money with this one.

https://twitter.com/DavidLammy/status/120288502789...

Giddy up, giddy up

[smn159]

ChevyChase77 said:

smn159 said:

ChevyChase77 said:

smn159 said:

ChevyChase77 said:

Corbyn as PM and Abbott as home secretary. It's a frightening thought. Still, Diane said she could put 10,000 extra police offices on the streets for only £30,000.

Whereas Johnson will build 40 new Hospitals and recruit 50,000 nurses presumably?

Abbott got tongue tied in an interview whereas Boris is deliberately lying.

She never got tongue tied. She didn't know. She tried to correct herself and still got it completely wrong.

I'll take no knowing during an interview over continually repeating something which you know is false and deliberately misleading.

So it's now confusing which person you are backing up here...........

Problem with your attention span maybe?

[abzmike]

ChevyChase77 said:

Why does Neil have any god given right to interview Boris? The more someone whinges and moans, the less I'd be inclined to do it to wind them up.

He is the BBC’s premier interviewer. The other leaders have subjected themselves to interview by him I would assume based on the assumption they all would.

[Alpinestars]

ChevyChase77 said:

Why does Neil have any god given right to interview Boris? The more someone whinges and moans, the less I'd be inclined to do it to wind them up.

He doesn’t. You haven’t answered the question, why wouldn’t he? You’ve asserted he’s done lots of others, will do more, so why not this one?

[ChevyChase77]

bhstewie said:

I don't always agree with David Lammy but I think he's on the money with this one.

https://twitter.com/DavidLammy/status/120288502789...

I don't think Lammy is the best person to use in this instance.

[bitchstewie]

ChevyChase77 said:

I don't think Lammy is the best person to use in this instance.

Does it make a difference?

https://twitter.com/alexwickham/status/12028819936...

[Supercilious Sid]

bhstewie said:

Does it make a difference?

https://twitter.com/alexwickham/status/12028819936...

Ah Buzzfeed that august institution so reknowned for its impartial and respected commentary. You are scraping the barrel.

[ChevyChase77]

Alpinestars said:

ChevyChase77 said:

Why does Neil have any god given right to interview Boris? The more someone whinges and moans, the less I'd be inclined to do it to wind them up.

He doesn’t. You haven’t answered the question, why wouldn’t he? You’ve asserted he’s done lots of others, will do more, so why not this one?

If you're that bothered try and get in contact with Boris' office and ask them.

[ChevyChase77]

bhstewie said:

Does it make a difference?

https://twitter.com/alexwickham/status/12028819936...

Yep.

[bitchstewie]

Supercilious Sid said:

Ah Buzzfeed that august institution so reknowned for its impartial and respected commentary. You are scraping the barrel.

Laura Kuenssberg too

https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1202880524286...

Disliking the messenger doesn't change the message.

[abzmike]

ChevyChase77 said:

If you're that bothered try and get in contact with Boris' office and ask them.

Dodged the question like a Tory... Boris would be proud...

[Alpinestars]

ChevyChase77 said:

Alpinestars said:

ChevyChase77 said:

Why does Neil have any god given right to interview Boris? The more someone whinges and moans, the less I'd be inclined to do it to wind them up.

He doesn’t. You haven’t answered the question, why wouldn’t he? You’ve asserted he’s done lots of others, will do more, so why not this one?

If you're that bothered try and get in contact with Boris' office and ask them.

More obfuscation. Debate only works if you partake, not deflect. That’s also Boris in a nutshell. Unable to back up his claims when challenged.

[anonymous-user]

ChevyChase77 said:

If you're that bothered try and get in contact with Boris' office and ask them.

I assumed you were working there.

[chemistry]

Boris is a fool who wants to dismantle part of what is good about the UK (our EU membership).

Corbyn is a hate fuelled moron who wants to destroy virtually all of what is good about the UK (democracy, free market economics, etc.).

The prospect of Boris as PM isn’t ideal. The prospect of Corbyn as PM is terrifying.

[ChevyChase77]

abzmike said:

ChevyChase77 said:

If you're that bothered try and get in contact with Boris' office and ask them.

Dodged the question like a Tory... Boris would be proud...

If somebody asks me about you and why you didn't do something I wouldn't know. Why should I know the reason behind Boris not being interviewed by Andrew Neil?

[Mobile Chicane]

chemistry said:

Boris is a fool who wants to dismantle part of what is good about the UK (our EU membership).

Corbyn is a hate fuelled moron who wants to destroy virtually all of what is good about the UK (democracy, free market economics, etc.).

The prospect of Boris as PM isn’t ideal. The prospect of Corbyn as PM is terrifying.

If you're a tax-dodging billionaire then I'm guessing the prospect of Corbyn as PM isn't one you'd relish.