Boris Johnson- Prime Minister (Vol. 3)
Discussion
citizensm1th said:
gooner1 said:
Nope, as I recall he refused to comply with the request to pass on information to a thug.
But I suspect you knew that.
That is not what was reported in the press. And I think you know that. But I suspect you knew that.
Do you believe every word printed about Corbyn?
gooner1 said:
That your first today trig.? 
Indeed it is Goon.Couple of spicy Bloody Marys to liven up the dull chore of clearing emails. then a bit of kip, a bit more PHing assuming the WiFi keeps working and then a couple of Old Fashioneds before dinner tonight
- edited due to apostrophe’s !!!*
Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 9th December 12:33
citizensm1th said:
Brave Fart said:
Charming. I am unclear on what you mean by "the latest Johnson blurb", but I have just watched Boris's interview yesterday with Sky. At no point does he come across as a thug. I'm calling you out here BV - calling Boris Johnson a "thug" is a stupid and inflammatory thing to say.
My learned friend should calm down and have a word with himself.
Did he not get involved in a plot to have a journalist assaulted, I think that counts as thuggish behaviour My learned friend should calm down and have a word with himself.
Edited to add that it isn't a transcript it is the recording.
Edited by b
hstewie on Monday 9th December 12:42
hstewie on Monday 9th December 12:42Brave Fart said:
I accept that some posters don't like Boris. and that you're cheesed off that his side looks likely to win, and your side to lose. Yeah, must hurt.
But calling Boris a "thug" and saying he's an accessory to assault or something? Come on, you're better than that.
I think you're conflating "dislike" with "unsuitable for public office".But calling Boris a "thug" and saying he's an accessory to assault or something? Come on, you're better than that.
I quite like Boris sometimes, not all the time of course, and I'd sooner him than Corbyn.
I just happen to think neither of them are fit to be Prime Minister.
Go look into it and listen to the recording and make your own mind up.
It's got nothing to do with "winning" or "losing".
Brave Fart said:
I accept that some posters don't like Boris. and that you're cheesed off that his side looks likely to win, and your side to lose. Yeah, must hurt.
But calling Boris a "thug" and saying he's an accessory to assault or something? Come on, you're better than that.
The thug or otherwise issue aside that is a bizarre choice of language as regards “sides”But calling Boris a "thug" and saying he's an accessory to assault or something? Come on, you're better than that.
For those who moan about the other lot of incompemetents magic money tree..
Johnson's '40 new hospitals' pledge costed at up to £24bn
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/08/b...
Articles also surfaced that he supported people who believed gay people should never be allowed to join the armed services.
Johnson's '40 new hospitals' pledge costed at up to £24bn
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/08/b...
Articles also surfaced that he supported people who believed gay people should never be allowed to join the armed services.
don'tbesilly said:
Upstanding guy Ali Milani, as long as he unseats Johnson many don't care and will hold their noses.
https://order-order.com/people/ali-milani/
Watching that one of the labour speakers challenged listeners to watch an Al Jazeera investigation called ‘the lobbyists’ i recommend a viewing.https://order-order.com/people/ali-milani/
Apparently the senior political attaché of the Israeli embassy is encouraging pro Israel groups.
WTF did she think his job was?
biggbn said:
For those who moan about the other lot of incompemetents magic money tree..
Johnson's '40 new hospitals' pledge costed at up to £24bn
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/08/b...
Articles also surfaced that he supported people who believed gay people should never be allowed to join the armed services.
The idea of, not gay but homosexual, gents being allowed into the armed forces has been around since about 1960, the theory propounded had nothing to do with sexual orientation but was about military effectiveness.Johnson's '40 new hospitals' pledge costed at up to £24bn
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/08/b...
Articles also surfaced that he supported people who believed gay people should never be allowed to join the armed services.
It was based on an early treatise in one of the Greek conflicts which showed that when a fellow soldier with whom you had a relationship was wounded, you were likely to protect him rather than pursuing the objective.
Rather than disapproval of relationships within unit, which I believe are still a no no for heterosexual couples, the military descended into intolerance of homosexuality.
stitched said:
The idea of, not gay but homosexual, gents being allowed into the armed forces has been around since about 1960, the theory propounded had nothing to do with sexual orientation but was about military effectiveness.
It was based on an early treatise in one of the Greek conflicts which showed that when a fellow soldier with whom you had a relationship was wounded, you were likely to protect him rather than pursuing the objective.
Rather than disapproval of relationships within unit, which I believe are still a no no for heterosexual couples, the military descended into intolerance of homosexuality.
“Descended into tolerance of homosexuality “ !??It was based on an early treatise in one of the Greek conflicts which showed that when a fellow soldier with whom you had a relationship was wounded, you were likely to protect him rather than pursuing the objective.
Rather than disapproval of relationships within unit, which I believe are still a no no for heterosexual couples, the military descended into intolerance of homosexuality.
AW111 said:
The people who go on about "sides" as if politics is a football game all seem to be right-wing / brexiteers.
Funny that.
I suppose cheering on the team is easier than thinking.
Hit the nail on the head there right enough. How many times have we seen Brexit / right wing enthusiasts posting that they're in favour of something or other just because 'it winds up the other side'Funny that.
I suppose cheering on the team is easier than thinking.
Typical of those who live their whole lives through social media
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff