RE: BMW X5 xDrive45e | Driven

RE: BMW X5 xDrive45e | Driven

Tuesday 10th December 2019

2020 BMW X5 xDrive45e | UK Review

Hybrid SUV trades four-pot for inline six; gets 50 per cent better



After years of engine downsizing, BMW's decision to replace its four-cylinder X5 40e with an inline six-powered 45e is welcome news. Not just because this is now a hybrid with a more powerful, sweeter-sounding motor, but because it also offers greater fuel economy, extended electric range and lower CO2, thanks to accompanying improvements in battery technology. It also means that for the first time, BMW's hybrid X5 mixes genuine driver appeal with broader efficiency claims - which immediately feels like a winning combination.

The 45e's powertrain is shared with the 745e, so it combines a 285hp 3.0-litre inline six with an 81kW electric motor that delivers an additional 112hp directly into the eight-speed torque converter. Combined, it outputs 394hp and, more interestingly, 442lb ft of torque - which, coincidentally, is exactly the same amount of twist produced by the highly-strung six-pot in the F80 M3 CS. Admittedly, the X5 45e is rather portly at 2.4 tonnes (300kg of which are batteries), but with instantaneous electric shove its rolling performance out to be really rather good. And comparable with Volvo's arch-rivalling XC90 T8 Twin Engine.


Our test car wore M Sport trim, so while it boasts plenty of eco credentials, the model possesses enough visual clout to appeal to British tastes. If there's a trim level to somewhat dilute the impact of those ever-divisive front grilles, it's M Sport, because the addenda - including beefier bumpers and the optional 22-inch wheels of this car - provide additional distractions. The X5 is far from pretty, but its scale alone gives it road presence, while also ensuring the cabin is spacious and practical. It's smart, too, with BMW's wide infotainment screen and digital instrument cluster offering great functionality - especially now that Apple CarPlay is standard - although it can't come anywhere near close to challenging Land Rover's interior for pizzazz.

That being said, the BMW does not feel short on quality because it is extremely refined, with the near silent electric motor making for a relaxing driving experience around town. Ask for more than the e-motor and 24kWh battery can provide - BMW claims 50 miles can be eked out between charges - and the petrol engine starts contributing seamlessness. It remains hushed in volume, producing a smooth six-pot hum that's only really audible when the radio's off. Progress feels swift yet effortless. BMW's fourth-gen electric tech is well polished these days, and nowhere is that clearer than in the brake pedal, which feels completely natural despite the energy recuperation tech the system employs. If there's a negative to note, it's that the PHEV charging system won't accept a fast charger.


But with the petrol engine onboard, you can at least hold charge until you arrive in a zone (such as a city) where electric running is preferable. In EV mode, the car is actually plenty quick enough for urban driving, but on the open road the petrol motor is essential. When up to speed the X5 45e feels every bit as brisk as you might expect, with super quick throttle response and a great sense of mid-range muscle. But coupled to the quietness of the six-cylinder, you're never beckoned to work the powertrain hard, nor does the ride encourage particularly enthusiastic driving. There's clearly a focus on comfort here, with the 45e lifting over crests and leaning around corners, albeit in a well-controlled way. The damping does a fine job of keeping things in check given the onerous nature of the payload, although plainly the weightiest X5 is tuned with unruffled progress in mind. Under duress, it often wants a second to settle - and its 'Sport' mode is more interested in sharpening the throttle response than turning up the damping.

Nevertheless, the 45e does what it says on the tin, bridging performance and economy in a practical, spacious package. With all that kit on board it's not cheap, as illustrated by the X5 driven which adds over £12k of options to the model's £65,760 starting price. But you are getting a broadly capable machine for that figure, one that will take advantage of the latest company car tax bracket benefits thanks to its modest electric range and low CO2 output. No less important is the quality of performance on offer from its six-cylinder engine, which leaves the four-pot-based Volvo Twin Power alternative looking somewhat outclassed. Expensive it may very well be, but it's likely the best option currently available in a fast-growing hybrid SUV segment.


SPECIFICATION - BMW X5 45E

Engine: 6 cyls in line, 2998cc, turbocharged petrol, plus electric motor
Transmission: 8-spd twin-clutch automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 394 (combined)
Torque (lb ft): 442 (combined)
0-62mph: 5.6 secs
Top speed: 146mph
Weight: 2,435kg
MPG: 35.3mpg
CO2: 32g/km
Price: £65,760 (price as tested: £78,235, including £2,095 technology pack, £2,350 comfort package, £1,900 M Sport Plus pack, £645 22-inch wheels, £2,440 panoramic glass roof, £700 adaptive LED headlights, £2,345 rear seat infotainment)

Search for a BMW X5 here














Author
Discussion

DBRacingGod

Original Poster:

609 posts

192 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
What a fat knacker.

GTEYE

2,096 posts

210 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
Seeing one at local dealer I was surprised just how tall these things are.

Must take ages to clean one, and you'd need ladders to reach the roof. But I'm sure few owners will clean their own, so it won't matter.

What does matter is that these are just too big for British roads, and car parks.

Each to their own, but its not for me.

And, the X7 is even bigger. Great.

Court_S

12,932 posts

177 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
Those bloody grilles. They look just as ridiculous on the M Sport version.

The rear end isn’t too bad aside from the silver insert in the rear bumper. Agree with the poster above; they’re really tall and it makes the proportions look odd.

Sport220

635 posts

75 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
Those wheels are lovely cloud9

This engine in a 3/5 series, now that would be nice

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,062 posts

98 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
Sport220 said:
Those wheels are lovely cloud9

This engine in a 3/5 series, now that would be nice
+1 - one of these engines in a 5 series estate is getting pretty close to the "one car to tick all the boxes". Something close to a 50 mile electric range starts to become genuinely useful for driving in town and to work.

stongle

5,910 posts

162 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
White does it no favors at all. Much nicer in darker hues. BMW have an issue with their interiors, they all look like an F10 3 series.

Having seen a few X3Ms about, and now there is an X7, what niche does the 5 fill? 7 seats get a 7, winding up Golf Rs get an X3M.

aeropilot

34,592 posts

227 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
The looks/styling don't bother me, its a white goods SUV after all, but the cost, largely because of BMW's stupid all or nothing option pack nonsense, means it's not a viable option for me to replace my F15 40d......especially as I now have my own drive so home charging is now an option for me in the future. I haven't looked, but I pressume the 2 axle air suspension is an option on the 45e?
Also, the serious lack of colour options for exterior and interior piss me off as well, as this constant fixation with living in a monochrome world is very frustrating.


scottygib553

531 posts

95 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
I think it’s a far more handsome car than before but gloss white with black wheels....yuck

grancab is my hero

767 posts

123 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
scottygib553 said:
I think it’s a far more handsome car than before but gloss white with black wheels....yuck
I think BMW offer different colour choices

grancab is my hero

767 posts

123 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
Large hybrid SUV in “heavy” shocker... let’s all comment about it

John Allison

22 posts

116 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
I feel like tax on cars should take into account the emissions created from their production as well as tail pipe emissions. Seems ridiculous that you pay lower tax to drive a 2.4 tonne SUV with 300kg of heavy metal in it’s batteries mined from god-knows-where because that’s supposedly ‘green’

ducnick

1,784 posts

243 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
They really need to allow customers to option comfort seats on the smaller cars. An x3 with comfort seats would be perfect for the daily, and much easier to park

FlukePlay

949 posts

145 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
Can't they offer BMWs with a choice of front grill? They give you so much choice in terms of models, range, trim, option packs so why not the bloody grill! These look ridiculous

JakeT

5,428 posts

120 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
GTEYE said:
Must take ages to clean one, and you'd need ladders to reach the roof..
The first gen X5 needs a ladder to clean the roof, too. It also takes an age to wash. Nothing new in the past 20 years. smile


I really like this powertrain. Sounds like it has the capability to be as smooth as it can get too. Nice, smooth six with electric assistance. Just need to bring it to the 3/5 series now, as others have said.

I don't think that'll happen though, the 330/530e will remain with their four cylinder hybrid powertrains.

The juxtaposition of a hybrid that weighs 2.4 tonnes is real though. I heard a snippet on the news yesterday about a climate bod stating that SUVs are a slap in the face of trying to prevent such drastic climate change. Without getting all political, I think he's right. Not only is it a massive amount of resources to create it, I am sure particulate matter from brakes are tyres are high considering the massive weight of a car like this. I'm sure it'll sell well though. Even if they never get plugged in.

Leins

9,468 posts

148 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
What does 45 equate to on the Audi scale?

TyrannosauRoss Lex

35,079 posts

212 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
GTEYE said:
Seeing one at local dealer I was surprised just how tall these things are.

Must take ages to clean one, and you'd need ladders to reach the roof. But I'm sure few owners will clean their own, so it won't matter.

What does matter is that these are just too big for British roads, and car parks.

Each to their own, but its not for me.

And, the X7 is even bigger. Great.
My car is even longer than this and don't find it too much of an issue. This is a tiny bit wider by a few cm I think which may be an issue for some but I don't think it's too big for British roads. Many people cope just fine driving fans, buses and so on. The width of them can be very handy, you can get 3 child seats across the back, something which can't be done in many estate cars. The height it rarely an issue for British roads.

s6boy

1,624 posts

225 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
John Allison said:
I feel like tax on cars should take into account the emissions created from their production as well as tail pipe emissions. Seems ridiculous that you pay lower tax to drive a 2.4 tonne SUV with 300kg of heavy metal in it’s batteries mined from god-knows-where because that’s supposedly ‘green’
Couldn't agree more it would be a joke if it wasn't so ridiculous, the sooner mainstream thinking wakes up to this the better. Legislation/tax is the only answer as either people don't see the wool being pulled over their eyes or don't care, but 300kg of extra weight and resources plus a 'hybrid' badge do not add up!

TyrannosauRoss Lex

35,079 posts

212 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
s6boy said:
John Allison said:
I feel like tax on cars should take into account the emissions created from their production as well as tail pipe emissions. Seems ridiculous that you pay lower tax to drive a 2.4 tonne SUV with 300kg of heavy metal in it’s batteries mined from god-knows-where because that’s supposedly ‘green’
Couldn't agree more it would be a joke if it wasn't so ridiculous, the sooner mainstream thinking wakes up to this the better. Legislation/tax is the only answer as either people don't see the wool being pulled over their eyes or don't care, but 300kg of extra weight and resources plus a 'hybrid' badge do not add up!
Well, not quite, in my opinion. If, over the course of its lifetime (production and use of, say, 150k miles) it produces equal emissions as another car, but if those emissions in production account for a much greater percentage than those emitted during use, and those production emissions are far, far away from populated city centres then it isn't as bad is it from a personal health perspective (fewer NOx emissions etc in local, populated areas).

Triumph Man

8,690 posts

168 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
Sport220 said:
Those wheels are lovely cloud9

This engine in a 3/5 series, now that would be nice
+1 - one of these engines in a 5 series estate is getting pretty close to the "one car to tick all the boxes". Something close to a 50 mile electric range starts to become genuinely useful for driving in town and to work.
+2 a 545e would be a lovely thing.

Shakermaker

11,317 posts

100 months

Tuesday 10th December 2019
quotequote all
John Allison said:
I feel like tax on cars should take into account the emissions created from their production as well as tail pipe emissions. Seems ridiculous that you pay lower tax to drive a 2.4 tonne SUV with 300kg of heavy metal in it’s batteries mined from god-knows-where because that’s supposedly ‘green’
Those who do the mining for said rare minerals will be taxed and the cost of that tax will already be factored into the production and sale cost.. or do you want yet more tax?