Coronavirus - Is this the killer flu that will wipe us out?

Coronavirus - Is this the killer flu that will wipe us out?

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

red_slr

17,278 posts

190 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
The fact we don't know this stuff just shows how risky the whole situation is and how weird this virus seems to be.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
''500 Chinese prisoners are infected with Covid-19, across three provinces. This includes 230 inmates at Wuhan’s Women’s Prison, where the director was sacked.''
https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2020/feb/21...

At least that Director survived..

Trophy Husband

3,924 posts

108 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
Covid 19 is the illness not the virus. The virus is a coronavirus of which there are 4 currently endemic. Interestingly an epidemiologist on R4 yesterday suggested that whilst it may become pandemic it may also become endemic thus making it the 5th coronavirus to be such, with one of them being the common cold. Whether we can then build resistance is another matter!

What are the figures for death from the common cold? Who knows?

Be afraid, be very afraid. Not.

turbobloke

104,067 posts

261 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
Trophy Husband said:
Covid 19 is the illness not the virus. The virus is a coronavirus of which there are 4 currently endemic. Interestingly an epidemiologist on R4 yesterday suggested that whilst it may become pandemic it may also become endemic thus making it the 5th coronavirus to be such, with one of them being the common cold. Whether we can then build resistance is another matter!

What are the figures for death from the common cold? Who knows?

Be afraid, be very afraid. Not.
From what I've read, most people with a cold have a rhinovirus of which there are far more flavours than common cold coronavirus which is single figures as above. The same source mentioned that the new coronavirus isn't prone to the type of change that makes resistance to a cold short-lived and requires annual flu jabs to cope with prevalent/new strains. This would mean a vaccine for the new coronavirus, once developed/tested/ready (12-18 months from kick-off allegedly) would remain useful for a longer period of time.

JagLover

42,475 posts

236 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
Thesprucegoose said:
There is no 'race genetics' as much as people like to make out. Races of people are vastly diverse, take African for example,this term alone is over 3000 variances in colour and physical difference, yet genetical near enough identical to you and me.
But there is a genetic basis for resistance to many diseases and those within a certain geographical area will often share many of those same characteristics.

iflscience said:
The Black Death, one of the most lethal pandemics humans have ever encountered, did not affect everyone equally. Those with certain variations of genes for the immune system were spared from contracting the plague while others with different variations died from the disease very quickly. Due to the sheer amount of people lost to the disease, those certain genetic variations were strongly advantageous and has had an impact on subsequent generations.

……………………………………………….

The same genes that benefitted their ancestors during bouts of the plague may influence their interaction with modern diseases, as those with European ancestry have higher instances of inflammatory disorders (caused by an overactive immune system) than those whose lineage was not affected by the plague
https://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/black-death-reshaped-human-genome/

Edited by JagLover on Saturday 22 February 06:10

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
Our findings demonstrated the considerable bias in the naïve estimate of the case fatality ratio calculated for all diagnosed patients. Although such methods are clearly easier to describe to policy makers and the public, important biases mean that the drawbacks will always outweigh the benefits and should not be used.

A bit of sense there at last, but lost in the desperation to show a low figure that’s more palatable and easily digested by the ignorant.

Maxf

8,409 posts

242 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
Trophy Husband said:
Covid 19 is the illness not the virus. The virus is a coronavirus of which there are 4 currently endemic. Interestingly an epidemiologist on R4 yesterday suggested that whilst it may become pandemic it may also become endemic thus making it the 5th coronavirus to be such, with one of them being the common cold. Whether we can then build resistance is another matter!

What are the figures for death from the common cold? Who knows?

Be afraid, be very afraid. Not.
So by your understanding it’s a disease which is caused by something like the common cold, but kills people far easier... possibly as easily as SARS? How many times have you had a normal common cold? And you’re not remotely afraid - if not for yourself, for you loved ones? Another internet billy big balls.

One of the serious cases in Italy is a 37 year old athlete- was out running 3 days before being in ICU. Common cold though.




anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
WHO: "Although the total number of COVID-19 cases outside of China remains relatively small, we are concerned about the number of cases with no clear epidemiological link, such as travel history to China or contact with a confirmed case" WHO chief
Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Feb. 21 press briefing


Wind blown? How?

Maxf

8,409 posts

242 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
V6 Pushfit said:
Wind blown? How?
It just means there are asymptomatic cases which have spread the virus, possibly to another before it is the passed on to someone who get symptoms making it impossible to contact trace. It’s not a biological weapon drifting in the wind.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
Singapore provides a lot of public info

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/coro...

Worth looking carefully through the whole article, but here are a few extracts

As of noon on Friday, the MOH has identified 2,696 close contacts, with 1,122 currently quarantined. Another 1,574 have completed their quarantine.

Youngest patient is 6 months old, oldest is 79. Whilst 2 cases were discharged after 2 days, 2 cases were in hospital for 28 days. 39 still hospitalised, 5 in icu

poo at Paul's

14,162 posts

176 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
V6 Pushfit said:
WHO: "Although the total number of COVID-19 cases outside of China remains relatively small, we are concerned about the number of cases with no clear epidemiological link, such as travel history to China or contact with a confirmed case" WHO chief
Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Feb. 21 press briefing


Wind blown? How?
Are they fking stupid? Unless they can prove none on the 1.4 billion people from China have been near, or been near someone else not from China who’s been near, that’s the link.
Seems pretty fking obvious to me!

Maxf

8,409 posts

242 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
V6 Pushfit said:
WHO: "Although the total number of COVID-19 cases outside of China remains relatively small, we are concerned about the number of cases with no clear epidemiological link, such as travel history to China or contact with a confirmed case" WHO chief
Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Feb. 21 press briefing


Wind blown? How?
Are they fking stupid? Unless they can prove none on the 1.4 billion people from China have been near, or been near someone else not from China who’s been near, that’s the link.
Seems pretty fking obvious to me!
That’s not what they are saying. They are saying they are concerned it is spreading silently and therefore in far less controllable. They aren’t saying they don’t know how the people got it... they obviously came into contact with someone with it, they just don’t know who.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
WHO seem to be pretty ineffective.

Either way it’s going to difficult bordering on impossible to stop it getting to the UK. So the questions are when and how disruptive will it be.

BJ: it’s here now so as the death rate is 1% we’ll manage, won’t we Jeremy? The 1% all the Boffins have told us.

JH: Ah yes, about that 1%, I’ve been meaning to explain...

red_slr

17,278 posts

190 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
Watched the doctors video (linked above) on his view on the post mortem report on a 50 something year old in Beijing I think it was. Scary stuff.

Basically your lungs slowly die whilst you remain fully conscious and generally ok other wise.

Their only hope to save you is to ventilate you, but even then they are basically just winging it on a hope that they can bring your lung function back up.

It took in this guys case roughly 48 hours for the lungs to go from poor to critical / fatal. The only other real problem the PM found was some minor liver damage, which could have been from the medication or the virus they don't know.

Those who think this is a common cold or just a runny nose are kidding themselves. If you get a bad dose of this you are f*cked.

Gregmitchell

1,745 posts

118 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
Yup, it’s not the flu, it’s not a cold, it’s some weird mutated virus that fks you up if you’re unlucky, be it a 30 year old or 70 year old, then there’s the fact it goes undetected and spreads without you knowing. The cases in Italy have unnerved me slightly.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
red_slr said:
Watched the doctors video (linked above) on his view on the post mortem report on a 50 something year old in Beijing I think it was. Scary stuff.

Basically your lungs slowly die whilst you remain fully conscious and generally ok other wise.

Their only hope to save you is to ventilate you, but even then they are basically just winging it on a hope that they can bring your lung function back up.

It took in this guys case roughly 48 hours for the lungs to go from poor to critical / fatal. The only other real problem the PM found was some minor liver damage, which could have been from the medication or the virus they don't know.

Those who think this is a common cold or just a runny nose are kidding themselves. If you get a bad dose of this you are f*cked.
That fits with the progression of the case in the USA, except that remdesivir worked: just before receiving remdesivir the patient needed ventilation and xrays were showing massive deterioration of lung condition. Next day, after remdesivir, he was up and about tucking into a big dinner

Mr Whippy

29,078 posts

242 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
JPJPJP said:
Singapore provides a lot of public info

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/coro...

Worth looking carefully through the whole article, but here are a few extracts

As of noon on Friday, the MOH has identified 2,696 close contacts, with 1,122 currently quarantined. Another 1,574 have completed their quarantine.

Youngest patient is 6 months old, oldest is 79. Whilst 2 cases were discharged after 2 days, 2 cases were in hospital for 28 days. 39 still hospitalised, 5 in icu
Interesting about saying getting it under control but then it could just come back in from an outside country.

I think if this thing really gets going, countries ‘doing well’ will be closing their borders more tightly, otherwise why bother fighting it if you’re just gonna let it in?

MaxFromage

1,899 posts

132 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
Figures from the John Hopkins tracker WITHOUT Hubei Province:

Confirmed cases: 14,208
Deaths: 110
Recovered: 7,460

In comparison to yesterday, 143 more confirmed cases, 7 more deaths and an increase of 686 in recovered patients.

poo at Paul's

14,162 posts

176 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
Maxf said:
That’s not what they are saying. They are saying they are concerned it is spreading silently and therefore in far less controllable. They aren’t saying they don’t know how the people got it... they obviously came into contact with someone with it, they just don’t know who.
Exactly. Which is why their statements that no travel restrictions were necessary three weeks ago is such horsest. And them rebuking countries that implemented it.
Some support for those without it, not just worrying upsetting the Chinese economy may have been an idea.

May as well have had the Chuckle Brothers in change. Useless

eharding

13,748 posts

285 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
V6 Pushfit said:
WHO seem to be pretty ineffective.

Either way it’s going to difficult bordering on impossible to stop it getting to the UK. So the questions are when and how disruptive will it be.

BJ: it’s here now so as the death rate is 1% we’ll manage, won’t we Jeremy? The 1% all the Boffins have told us.

JH: Ah yes, about that 1%, I’ve been meaning to explain...
Jeremy H?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED