Coronavirus - Is this the killer flu that will wipe us out?

[jimPH]

UK, 16+3. Who's the new third?

[anonymous-user]

isaldiri said:

when are you publishing your scientific paper to get your way of calculation to become the globally accepted standard for estimating the cfr for an ongoing outbreak because you've cracked it and no one else anywhere in the world has any clue or has been doing the wrong thing?

I haven’t cracked anything. There are only two numbers so if you think that’s a code to crack then rock on.

[scottydoesntknow]

Here's How China Is Hunting Down Coronavirus Critics

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/wxepem/heres-ho...

[anonymous-user]

scottydoesntknow said:

Here's How China Is Hunting Down Coronavirus Critics

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/wxepem/heres-ho...

I wonder what the reality is out there for err real

[loafer123]

V6 Pushfit said:

isaldiri said:

when are you publishing your scientific paper to get your way of calculation to become the globally accepted standard for estimating the cfr for an ongoing outbreak because you've cracked it and no one else anywhere in the world has any clue or has been doing the wrong thing?

I haven’t cracked anything. There are only two numbers so if you think that’s a code to crack then rock on.

For the avoidance of doubt, the lack of people arguing with you does not mean we agree with you.

We are just bored of arguing with you.

[anonymous-user]

loafer123 said:

For the avoidance of doubt, the lack of people arguing with you does not mean we agree with you.

We are just bored of arguing with you.

Fine with me, just don’t bother quoting a misleading rate dreamt up by a body claiming to represent the worlds health interests.

[Gregmitchell]

m3jappa said:

Exige77 said:

One for the conspiracy theorists

i am what i would describe as a low level conspiracy theorist. That is to say i dont believe everything we are told but i dont think the queen is a lizard

However things like above are seriously fking weird! what the hell is that all about?

That is freeky! Totally love it, what a find!

[loafer123]

V6 Pushfit said:

loafer123 said:

For the avoidance of doubt, the lack of people arguing with you does not mean we agree with you.

We are just bored of arguing with you.

Fine with me, just don’t bother quoting a misleading rate dreamt up by a body claiming to represent the worlds health interests.

We believe the various scientists who have published papers, not a nutter on a car forum.

[superkartracer]

All these calcs on the numbers, seem fruitless.

• China data comical
• WHO..
• Testing failing to spot cases
• People testing neg then pos in 24 hours cycles
• People seem to be catching it twice then suffer heart failure
• Screening seems to fail (temp and x-rays)
• Masks are useless and worn poorly
• 14 day self isolation overly short
• Virus most likely on many surfaces for days

It's a mess

[TheJimi]

loafer123 said:

V6 Pushfit said:

isaldiri said:

when are you publishing your scientific paper to get your way of calculation to become the globally accepted standard for estimating the cfr for an ongoing outbreak because you've cracked it and no one else anywhere in the world has any clue or has been doing the wrong thing?

I haven’t cracked anything. There are only two numbers so if you think that’s a code to crack then rock on.

For the avoidance of doubt, the lack of people arguing with you does not mean we agree with you.

We are just bored of arguing with you.

What he said.

There's a few posters I don't even read now, I just scroll past.

[anonymous-user]

TheJimi said:

What he said.

There's a few posters I don't even read now, I just scroll past.

I’m mortified

[Gregmitchell]

superkartracer said:

All these calcs on the numbers, seem fruitless.

• China data comical
• WHO..
• Testing failing to spot cases
• People testing neg then pos in 24 hours cycles
• People seem to be catching it twice then suffer heart failure
• Screening seems to fail (temp and x-rays)
• Masks are useless and worn poorly
• 14 day self isolation overly short
• Virus most likely on many surfaces for days

It's a mess

I agree with most of that, but have you got any links to this one?

• People seem to be catching it twice then suffer heart failure

[Jonesy23]

Gregmitchell said:

m3jappa said:

Exige77 said:

One for the conspiracy theorists

i am what i would describe as a low level conspiracy theorist. That is to say i dont believe everything we are told but i dont think the queen is a lizard

However things like above are seriously fking weird! what the hell is that all about?

That is freeky! Totally love it, what a find!

That old rubbish? That's the much later reprint, the original 1981 version had the Russians as the source and the rest of the details to match - Wuhan wasn't in it.

[Exige77]

Jonesy23 said:

Gregmitchell said:

m3jappa said:

Exige77 said:

One for the conspiracy theorists

i am what i would describe as a low level conspiracy theorist. That is to say i dont believe everything we are told but i dont think the queen is a lizard

However things like above are seriously fking weird! what the hell is that all about?

That is freeky! Totally love it, what a find!

That old rubbish? That's the much later reprint, the original 1981 version had the Russians as the source and the rest of the details to match - Wuhan wasn't in it.

Think it’s the 1988 reprint

[RTB]

anxious_ant said:

First town in lockdown More to follow?

A bit grim looking at map below, almost whole planet infected.

Buxton isn't in lockdown at all. If you believe the daily mail then you should be more worried about stupidity killing you before the virus.

[Ayahuasca]

Fairly well known that Wuhan has a bio warfare lab a bit like our porton down, so not that bizarre to set a thriller around it.

[emperorburger]

Jonesy23 said:

Gregmitchell said:

m3jappa said:

Exige77 said:

One for the conspiracy theorists

i am what i would describe as a low level conspiracy theorist. That is to say i dont believe everything we are told but i dont think the queen is a lizard

However things like above are seriously fking weird! what the hell is that all about?

That is freeky! Totally love it, what a find!

That old rubbish? That's the much later reprint, the original 1981 version had the Russians as the source and the rest of the details to match - Wuhan wasn't in it.

The pages are actually from different books.

[Leylandeye]

Jonesy23 said:

Gregmitchell said:

m3jappa said:

Exige77 said:

One for the conspiracy theorists

i am what i would describe as a low level conspiracy theorist. That is to say i dont believe everything we are told but i dont think the queen is a lizard

However things like above are seriously fking weird! what the hell is that all about?

That is freeky! Totally love it, what a find!

That old rubbish? That's the much later reprint, the original 1981 version had the Russians as the source and the rest of the details to match - Wuhan wasn't in it.

Even if it was, it's not uncommon for fiction to coincidently have some points which partially become reality.

[Abbott]

poo at Paul's said:

lampchair said:

One in NI now too, their first

Flew into Dublin from north Italy so could have spread it in Ireland too?

People need to stop travelling and reduce socialising. Interesting how many hotspots are related to religious areas too. Ffs god ain’t gunna sort this one !

Edited by poo at Paul's on Thursday 27th February 20:06

I thought I saw somewhere that the Pope had a bit of a cough

[sherbertdip]

emperorburger said:

Jonesy23 said:

Gregmitchell said:

m3jappa said:

Exige77 said:

One for the conspiracy theorists

i am what i would describe as a low level conspiracy theorist. That is to say i dont believe everything we are told but i dont think the queen is a lizard

However things like above are seriously fking weird! what the hell is that all about?

That is freeky! Totally love it, what a find!

That old rubbish? That's the much later reprint, the original 1981 version had the Russians as the source and the rest of the details to match - Wuhan wasn't in it.

The pages are actually from different books.

I don't think Exige77 was claiming they're the same book, and i don't where he pinched the photos from as he hasn't said, but I read about those coincidences a few days ago, the lower one is from some almanac or book of predictions not a novel.