Why do cyclists try to undertake left turning trucks ?
Discussion
OP is either blind or very dumb. How on earth can you blame cyclist. He is just going normally in his lane. Van driver was not paying attention and did not bother to check mirrors before turning.
Van driver knew he was about to turn so should have slowed and waited for the traffic on his left to pass rather than cutting over and causing an accident.
No different really from someone cutting across the inside of a roundabout and colliding with the outer lane car.
The driver overtook the cyclist about 3 seconds before the crash so driver clearly just not paying attention.
Court gave the driver 6 points for this so evidently the cyclist is NOT at fault.
Van driver knew he was about to turn so should have slowed and waited for the traffic on his left to pass rather than cutting over and causing an accident.
No different really from someone cutting across the inside of a roundabout and colliding with the outer lane car.
The driver overtook the cyclist about 3 seconds before the crash so driver clearly just not paying attention.
Court gave the driver 6 points for this so evidently the cyclist is NOT at fault.
Edited by treeroy on Thursday 13th February 16:01
Even longer video here:
https://road.cc/content/news/271023-dramatic-foota...
At 0:01 cycling filming comes past Tesco van and joins cyclists waiting in the cycle area
At 0:43 cyclist leaves traffic lights
At 0:58 Tesco van is about level with the rear of the cyclist
At 1:02 Tesco van is about level with the front of the cyclist
At 1:04 an indicator comes on
At 1:05 the van is turning
So much for mirror, signal, manoeuvre...
https://road.cc/content/news/271023-dramatic-foota...
At 0:01 cycling filming comes past Tesco van and joins cyclists waiting in the cycle area
At 0:43 cyclist leaves traffic lights
At 0:58 Tesco van is about level with the rear of the cyclist
At 1:02 Tesco van is about level with the front of the cyclist
At 1:04 an indicator comes on
At 1:05 the van is turning
So much for mirror, signal, manoeuvre...
The cyclist wasn't overtaking, passing or filtering. They did hardly anything wrong and the Tesco lorry driver was entirely to blame, having passed and then cut across. It's possible to say the cyclist could have anticipated, what might have happened but it in no way shifts the blame.
cicada273 said:
The cyclist wasn't undertaking a left turning truck. That cyclist was in a dedicated bike lane and it's quite normal to pass vehicles in such a lane - when the cyclist initiated the pass, the van wasn't indicating, wasn't slowing and was showing no other signs of turning. Shoving on your indicator half a second before you brake and turn is not indicating, it's dangerous driving.The correct defensive approach for the cyclist would be to not pass any vehicle by any junction, but obviously that can get quite onerous in London when there are junctions every 5 seconds. I do this, but I admit it takes me much longer to get anywhere in a busy town and it can get quite tedious.
So in summary: legally, the van driver is 100% at fault and will probably lose his license for dangerous driving. However, as with most accidents, the cyclist could have been more aware and prevented the incident.
RobM77 said:
So in summary: legally, the van driver is 100% at fault and will probably lose his license for dangerous driving.
Driver received a £300 fine, plus £332 in costs and six points for ‘failing to nominate driver'.RobM77 said:
However, as with most accidents, the cyclist could have been more aware and prevented the incident.
Please explain how the cyclist could have done this.RobM77 said:
The cyclist wasn't undertaking a left turning truck. That cyclist was in a dedicated bike lane and it's quite normal to pass vehicles in such a lane - when the cyclist initiated the pass, the van wasn't indicating, wasn't slowing and was showing no other signs of turning. Shoving on your indicator half a second before you brake and turn is not indicating, it's dangerous driving.
The correct defensive approach for the cyclist would be to not pass any vehicle by any junction, but obviously that can get quite onerous in London when there are junctions every 5 seconds. I do this, but I admit it takes me much longer to get anywhere in a busy town and it can get quite tedious.
So in summary: legally, the van driver is 100% at fault and will probably lose his license for dangerous driving. However, as with most accidents, the cyclist could have been more aware and prevented the incident.
The cyclist didn't initiate the pass thoughThe correct defensive approach for the cyclist would be to not pass any vehicle by any junction, but obviously that can get quite onerous in London when there are junctions every 5 seconds. I do this, but I admit it takes me much longer to get anywhere in a busy town and it can get quite tedious.
So in summary: legally, the van driver is 100% at fault and will probably lose his license for dangerous driving. However, as with most accidents, the cyclist could have been more aware and prevented the incident.
Here's a link to the full original video for those who still think the cyclist was to blame/could have avoided this incident etc. instead of watching the click-baity weighted DM version.
https://youtu.be/cwESJvi1qvk
1m3s the van starts to indicate
1m5s the van has already started to turn in on the cyclist
https://youtu.be/cwESJvi1qvk
1m3s the van starts to indicate
1m5s the van has already started to turn in on the cyclist
Its the vans fault for sure.
However the cyclist is fairly motoring along and doesn't show any signs of slowing/erring on the side of caution...not that he should have to, but if he had have spared himself bouncing off the side a lorry and only been a few seconds slower to where ever hes going.
As i said not his fault but best to read the road a bit!
However the cyclist is fairly motoring along and doesn't show any signs of slowing/erring on the side of caution...not that he should have to, but if he had have spared himself bouncing off the side a lorry and only been a few seconds slower to where ever hes going.
As i said not his fault but best to read the road a bit!
Your Dad said:
RobM77 said:
So in summary: legally, the van driver is 100% at fault and will probably lose his license for dangerous driving.
Driver received a £300 fine, plus £332 in costs and six points for ‘failing to nominate driver'.RobM77 said:
However, as with most accidents, the cyclist could have been more aware and prevented the incident.
Please explain how the cyclist could have done this.RobM, if as you say you have a V8.MGB race car and one might think you have a ticket, WHY would you think this ?
u33db said:
doesn't show any signs of slowing/erring on the side of caution...not that he should have to, but if he had have spared himself bouncing off the side a lorry and only been a few seconds slower to where ever hes going.
As i said not his fault but best to read the road a bit!
I'll remember that advice when I drive home tonight, whenever another vehicle passes me on the motorway I'll ensure I slow down in case they want to cut me up.As i said not his fault but best to read the road a bit!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff