The “anti-Greta”

Author
Discussion

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

108 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
Jinx said:
That's not the redistribution of waelth the UN is aiming for though is it?
Go on, enlighten me, what are the UN aiming for? hehe

Jinx

11,391 posts

260 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
Go on, enlighten me, what are the UN aiming for? hehe
Have you read the Paris accords?

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

108 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
Jinx said:
Gadgetmac said:
Go on, enlighten me, what are the UN aiming for? hehe
Have you read the Paris accords?
How about not answering a question with a question but rather with an answer.

Jinx

11,391 posts

260 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
How about not answering a question with a question but rather with an answer.
Read all about it.......

The mechanism:
https://www.greenclimate.fund/about
Some criticism:
https://us.boell.org/en/2019/08/26/green-climate-f...

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/climate/au...

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/why-w...

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

108 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
So a fund (GCF) that's like a foreign aid fund. That's it?

Like I said earlier, sending aid to poorer countries doesn't constitute A move towards socialism nor does funding various initiatives worldwide to help in the fight against AGW.

And a couple of opinion pieces on why it's not a great idea. Really?

None of this is evidence of the UN undermining capitalism. If that's the best you can come up with...

smn159

12,662 posts

217 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
Always amuses when people have strong opinions but are completely unable to articulate them other than by cutting and pasting links to other peoples opinions

hehe

jagnet

4,111 posts

202 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
It's a perfect example of socialism, replacing factors of production with direct allocation of resources.

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

108 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
jagnet said:
It's a perfect example of socialism, replacing factors of production with direct allocation of resources.
Damn the Tory party and other Western right wing governments for joining up to a scheme to usher in a new socialist world order biggrin

Jinx

11,391 posts

260 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
smn159 said:
Always amuses when people have strong opinions but are completely unable to articulate them other than by cutting and pasting links to other peoples opinions

hehe
This is an internet forum - not suitable for a treatise on the socialist paradigm inherent in the composition of the United Nations. Hence the links to further reading rather than a 10,000 word exposition with bibliography which will merely elicit a TL:DR response.

I'll leave you with this one link instead. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/docu...

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

108 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
And I'll leave you with this one link also:

https://www.splcenter.org/20140331/agenda-21-un-su...

Jinx

11,391 posts

260 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
And I'll leave you with this one link also:

https://www.splcenter.org/20140331/agenda-21-un-su...
Mine was from the UN.

John Locke

1,142 posts

52 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
A few chaps(?) easily triggered by an intelligent articulate young lady, on this thread it seems.
What are they frightened of, one wonders.

Esceptico

Original Poster:

7,482 posts

109 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
And I'll leave you with this one link also:

https://www.splcenter.org/20140331/agenda-21-un-su...
Could only read a bit of that as it was so depressing. I would ask how people can be so stupid but then there is plenty of evidence of it on these climate change related threads.

Esceptico

Original Poster:

7,482 posts

109 months

Friday 6th March 2020
quotequote all
Jinx said:
This is an internet forum - not suitable for a treatise on the socialist paradigm inherent in the composition of the United Nations. Hence the links to further reading rather than a 10,000 word exposition with bibliography which will merely elicit a TL:DR response.

I'll leave you with this one link instead. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/docu...
It would be better if you could link to a document that shows the extent to which those lofty, non binding goals from 1992 have been met or if any of them have been implemented to any great extent. Given that annual CO2 emissions have increased massively, the population has grown by another half a billion or so, big chunks of the Amazon rainforest have disappeared, etc plus the fact that most of the world’s population are ruled over by right wing or totalitarian regimes the answer is likely to be no. But please do carry on scaremongering based on no facts.

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

108 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
John Locke said:
A few chaps(?) easily triggered by an intelligent articulate young lady, on this thread it seems.
What are they frightened of, one wonders.
Said with not a hint of irony for the 178 page Greta thread. rofl

John Locke

1,142 posts

52 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
John Locke said:
A few chaps(?) easily triggered by an intelligent articulate young lady, on this thread it seems.
What are they frightened of, one wonders.
Said with not a hint of irony for the 178 page Greta thread. rofl
Surely you're not really that dense, are you?

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

108 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
John Locke said:
Gadgetmac said:
John Locke said:
A few chaps(?) easily triggered by an intelligent articulate young lady, on this thread it seems.
What are they frightened of, one wonders.
Said with not a hint of irony for the 178 page Greta thread. rofl
Surely you're not really that dense, are you?
Clearly you are if you can't see the comparison.

I agree she's articulate though. Especially when espousing her respect for white supremacists.

Dont Panic

1,389 posts

51 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
Clearly you are if you can't see the comparison.

I agree she's articulate though. Especially when espousing her respect for white supremacists.
Still playing that record I see.

What do you think of her suggestion that she wants people to think and not panic?

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

108 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
Dont Panic said:
Gadgetmac said:
Clearly you are if you can't see the comparison.

I agree she's articulate though. Especially when espousing her respect for white supremacists.
Still playing that record I see.

What do you think of her suggestion that she wants people to think and not panic?
It would have been smarter if she'd said she wanted people to think about the overwhelming amount of advice being given by scientists and experts and act accordingly.

You know, the same as people will be doing over Coronavirus.

powerstroke

10,283 posts

160 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
jagnet said:
It's a perfect example of socialism, replacing factors of production with direct allocation of resources.
Damn the Tory party and other Western right wing governments for joining up to a scheme to usher in a new socialist world order biggrin
Sadly it would appear they never learnt the fable of the emperors new clothes ...