Can Sir Keir Starmer revive the Labour Party?
Discussion
techguyone said:
Things like this maybe:
How would you rate your curry?
Was the beer to your satisfaction?
In a score from 1 -10 how would you rank your videographer?
Questions like that perhaps?
In your estimation, how many people were in attendance at the event?How would you rate your curry?
Was the beer to your satisfaction?
In a score from 1 -10 how would you rank your videographer?
Questions like that perhaps?
5
10
12
15
20
30
(Tick all that apply)
Camoradi said:
techguyone said:
Things like this maybe:
How would you rate your curry?
Was the beer to your satisfaction?
In a score from 1 -10 how would you rank your videographer?
Questions like that perhaps?
In your estimation, how many people were in attendance at the event?How would you rate your curry?
Was the beer to your satisfaction?
In a score from 1 -10 how would you rank your videographer?
Questions like that perhaps?
5
10
12
15
20
30
(
Camoradi said:
techguyone said:
Things like this maybe:
How would you rate your curry?
Was the beer to your satisfaction?
In a score from 1 -10 how would you rank your videographer?
Questions like that perhaps?
In your estimation, how many people were in attendance at the event?How would you rate your curry?
Was the beer to your satisfaction?
In a score from 1 -10 how would you rank your videographer?
Questions like that perhaps?
5
10
12
15
20
30
(Tick all that apply)
A. Yes
B. No
C. Like Schrödinger's cat it's a paradox of quantum superposition. She can be thought of as simultaneously both there and not there until someone finds out she really was there.
98elise said:
Q2. Was Angela Rayner in attendance?
A. Yes
B. No
C. Like Schrödinger's cat it's a paradox of quantum superposition. She can be thought of as simultaneously both there and not there until someone finds out she really was there.
Q3. Was the PCC elect present?A. Yes
B. No
C. Like Schrödinger's cat it's a paradox of quantum superposition. She can be thought of as simultaneously both there and not there until someone finds out she really was there.
Q4. If yes, might this have been the cause of the delayed forms and reticence to answer.
I hope he doesn't get an GPN and we then have pages of people on here who were accusing the Met of being bent, levelling the same accusations at the Durham mob.
Highly amusing.
What an opportunity he has been given this week by the Conservative in-house fighting. He has been accused of being dull but could that not be an advantage? At least he is a high!y articulate debater who also knows how to dress and present himself. The electorate is weary of gimmics. If he can sideline some of the more extreme element in his party, he deserves to do better. The spin around Boris this week is risible.
Murph7355 said:
98elise said:
Q2. Was Angela Rayner in attendance?
A. Yes
B. No
C. Like Schrödinger's cat it's a paradox of quantum superposition. She can be thought of as simultaneously both there and not there until someone finds out she really was there.
Q3. Was the PCC elect present?A. Yes
B. No
C. Like Schrödinger's cat it's a paradox of quantum superposition. She can be thought of as simultaneously both there and not there until someone finds out she really was there.
Q4. If yes, might this have been the cause of the delayed forms and reticence to answer.
I hope he doesn't get an GPN and we then have pages of people on here who were accusing the Met of being bent, levelling the same accusations at the Durham mob.
Highly amusing.
Lester H said:
At least he is a highly articulate debater
Is this a joke? The bloke is useless. Even if he is intelligent (since top lawyer and all that b
ks; something I doubt to be honest) it counts for nothing cos he has no charisma and doesn’t present interesting arguments or ideas to Boris / the Tory party. He just makes mealy mouthed statements thinking he’s coming out on top cos Boris ate cake.
Absolutely useless.
CoolHands said:
Lester H said:
At least he is a highly articulate debater
Is this a joke? The bloke is useless. Even if he is intelligent (since top lawyer and all that bks; something I doubt to be honest) it counts for nothing cos he has no charisma and doesn’t present interesting arguments or ideas to Boris / the Tory party. He just makes mealy mouthed statements thinking he’s coming out on top cos Boris ate cake.
Absolutely useless.
CoolHands said:
Lester H said:
At least he is a highly articulate debater
Is this a joke? The bloke is useless. Even if he is intelligent (since top lawyer and all that bks; something I doubt to be honest) it counts for nothing cos he has no charisma and doesn’t present interesting arguments or ideas to Boris / the Tory party. He just makes mealy mouthed statements thinking he’s coming out on top cos Boris ate cake.
Absolutely useless.
https://archive.ph/aOxxD
loafer123 said:
Vasco said:
Agreed, I too was somewhat surprised at the 'highly articulate' comment. He reminds me a bit of that other grey man with no personality - John Major (though I believe he was more intelligent than he appeared).
Major was supposed to have charisma in person, though…AstonZagato said:
Quentin Letts was damning today in the Times
https://archive.ph/aOxxD
Haha I enjoyed thathttps://archive.ph/aOxxD
Quentin said:
He (Boris) was saved by his rival. In one of the more baffling parliamentary performances of recent years, Starmer chose this moment of Johnson’s mortal danger to start talking about Covid and hospitals.
It is indeed baffling. How can starmer be so bad at his job.
CoolHands said:
AstonZagato said:
Quentin Letts was damning today in the Times
https://archive.ph/aOxxD
Haha I enjoyed thathttps://archive.ph/aOxxD
Quentin said:
He (Boris) was saved by his rival. In one of the more baffling parliamentary performances of recent years, Starmer chose this moment of Johnson’s mortal danger to start talking about Covid and hospitals.
It is indeed baffling. How can starmer be so bad at his job.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff