Can Sir Keir Starmer revive the Labour Party?

[86]

urquattroGus said:

Alexei Sayle on Keir Starmer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx_l9o0i37c

Seems about right. Did I tell you about when I was Director of Public Prosecutions - Yawn yawn.

[turbobloke]

andy43 said:

xstian said:

86 said:

Still I’m sure Andy Burnham will resign as Mayor after his reckless speeding conviction. Only right that Starmer asks him to step aside after he asked Sunak to resign over his fixed penalty notice. Starmer a man of principle and would of course want to be even handed !

What idiot Burnham is. He forgot to film himself breaking the law and then release it as a promotional video.

Still, it's 2-0 to Sunak.

78 in a 40. We do things differently in Manchester

Surely a fully committed tovarisch like Burnham should be fully committed to the slower mode of egalitarian collective transport

[86]

Is Burnham sure the Party Zil can go that fast ?

https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/news/a32060/...

[AstonZagato]

turbobloke said:

andy43 said:

xstian said:

86 said:

Still I’m sure Andy Burnham will resign as Mayor after his reckless speeding conviction. Only right that Starmer asks him to step aside after he asked Sunak to resign over his fixed penalty notice. Starmer a man of principle and would of course want to be even handed !

What idiot Burnham is. He forgot to film himself breaking the law and then release it as a promotional video.

Still, it's 2-0 to Sunak.

78 in a 40. We do things differently in Manchester

Surely a fully committed tovarisch like Burnham should be fully committed to the slower mode of egalitarian collective transport

The Party Secretariat will have dedicated lanes to speed them past the proles.

[pquinn]

AstonZagato said:

The Party Secretariat will have dedicated lanes to speed them past the proles.

In their armoured Range Rover with police escort.

Surprised Andy hasn't already followed the existing trend on that front.

[86]

pquinn said:

AstonZagato said:

The Party Secretariat will have dedicated lanes to speed them past the proles.

In their armoured Range Rover with police escort.

Surprised Andy hasn't already followed the existing trend on that front.

Comrade Khan always has a motorcade of gas guzzlers to walk the dog!! Bring on the ULEZ for the peasants

https://www.energylivenews.com/2021/08/23/sadiq-kh...

[turbobloke]

86 said:

pquinn said:

AstonZagato said:

The Party Secretariat will have dedicated lanes to speed them past the proles.

In their armoured Range Rover with police escort.

Surprised Andy hasn't already followed the existing trend on that front.

Comrade Khan always has a motorcade of gas guzzlers to walk the dog!! Bring on the ULEZ for the peasants

https://www.energylivenews.com/2021/08/23/sadiq-kh...

FFS.

Actually it's just right, bearing in mind the expected level of hypocrisy, coupled to semi-plausible excuses.

[bitchstewie]

You're angry because the Mayor of London was in a vehicle belonging to the Met Police?

[turbobloke]

bhstewie said:

You're angry because the Mayor of London was in a vehicle belonging to the Met Police?

You think people are angry? Or just me?

Annoyed and disappointed (as usual with a politician) but not surprised.

[86]

bhstewie said:

You're angry because the Mayor of London was in a vehicle belonging to the Met Police?

Funded by the tax payer to walk his dog !!

[Riff Raff]

86 said:

bhstewie said:

You're angry because the Mayor of London was in a vehicle belonging to the Met Police?

Funded by the tax payer to walk his dog !!

Is he not entitled to protection from loons?

Is Rishi not benefiting from the same protection? Or other members of the government?

[loafer123]

Riff Raff said:

Is he not entitled to protection from loons?

Is Rishi not benefiting from the same protection? Or other members of the government?

Real question;

Does Burnham have the same protection?

[bitchstewie]

No idea but I'd assume it's based on what GMP consider appropriate and proportionate.

The idea that Khan said "I want to take the dog for a walk send three cars" seems a stretch.

[86]

Riff Raff said:

86 said:

bhstewie said:

You're angry because the Mayor of London was in a vehicle belonging to the Met Police?

Funded by the tax payer to walk his dog !!

Is he not entitled to protection from loons?

Is Rishi not benefiting from the same protection? Or other members of the government?

Khan is anti motorist except when he needs to use one himself. Typical hypocrite

[Riff Raff]

loafer123 said:

Riff Raff said:

Is he not entitled to protection from loons?

Is Rishi not benefiting from the same protection? Or other members of the government?

Real question;

Does Burnham have the same protection?

I have no idea. Maybe they can’t keep up with Burnham. What I would expect is that the Met have carried out a proper threat assessment and are providing the cover necessary. If I were in Khan’s shoes, I’d be doing exactly what I was advised to do. As I said, there are a lot of loons out there.

[turbobloke]

Riff Raff said:

loafer123 said:

Riff Raff said:

Is he not entitled to protection from loons?

Is Rishi not benefiting from the same protection? Or other members of the government?

Real question;

Does Burnham have the same protection?

I have no idea. Maybe they can’t keep up with Burnham. What I would expect is that the Met have carried out a proper threat assessment and are providing the cover necessary. If I were in Khan’s shoes, I’d be doing exactly what I was advised to do. As I said, there are a lot of loons out there.

And when reviewing the transport, diesel do. Emitting one of the most potent carcinogens known, if not the most potent, when under load (3-NBA) in a ULEZ implementation programme. Perfect. Naturally this isn't on the list.

[Riff Raff]

turbobloke said:

Riff Raff said:

loafer123 said:

Riff Raff said:

Is he not entitled to protection from loons?

Is Rishi not benefiting from the same protection? Or other members of the government?

Real question;

Does Burnham have the same protection?

I have no idea. Maybe they can’t keep up with Burnham. What I would expect is that the Met have carried out a proper threat assessment and are providing the cover necessary. If I were in Khan’s shoes, I’d be doing exactly what I was advised to do. As I said, there are a lot of loons out there.

And when reviewing the transport, diesel do. Emitting one of the most potent carcinogens known, if not the most potent, when under load (3-NBA) in a ULEZ implementation programme. Perfect. Naturally this isn't on the list.

You’ll need to show me the bit where Khan gets to choose what vehicles the Met use for their personal protection duties. Can’t do that? Just more turboblowingsmokeupallourasses.

[turbobloke]

Riff Raff said:

turbobloke said:

Riff Raff said:

loafer123 said:

Riff Raff said:

Is he not entitled to protection from loons?

Is Rishi not benefiting from the same protection? Or other members of the government?

Real question;

Does Burnham have the same protection?

I have no idea. Maybe they can’t keep up with Burnham. What I would expect is that the Met have carried out a proper threat assessment and are providing the cover necessary. If I were in Khan’s shoes, I’d be doing exactly what I was advised to do. As I said, there are a lot of loons out there.

And when reviewing the transport, diesel do. Emitting one of the most potent carcinogens known, if not the most potent, when under load (3-NBA) in a ULEZ implementation programme. Perfect. Naturally this isn't on the list.

You’ll need to show me the bit where Khan gets to choose what vehicles the Met use for their personal protection duties. Can’t do that? Just more turboblowingsmokeupallourasses.

MOPAC, tail wagging the dog?

[valiant]

86 said:

Khan is anti motorist except when he needs to use one himself. Typical hypocrite

When the Met decides that he needs protection due to threats from loons and then supply the car via the JLR Sentinel program of which Khan has little choice over, it’s a bit rich to call him a hypocrite.

[turbobloke]

valiant said:

86 said:

Khan is anti motorist except when he needs to use one himself. Typical hypocrite

When the Met decides that he needs protection due to threats from loons and then supply the car via the JLR Sentinel program of which Khan has little choice over, it’s a bit rich to call him a hypocrite.

Through MOPAC the Mayor is responsible for setting policing and crime priorities for London, holding the Met Police Commissioner to account. ULEZ is apparently a priority for London, for the city, except when Khan apologism matters more.

3-NBA is particularly (pun intended) good at causing lung and liver tumours, you have to wonder, now many of these are 'worth it' especially in a ULEZ.